Advertisement

Trust During Transition: Strategic Leadership and Trust Development During Principal Succession

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 13)

Abstract

With an ever-increasing number of administrator turnovers and retirements the need for strategic leadership and trust development on the part of succeeding principals to develop and sustain organizational learning and school improvement initiatives is paramount. This chapter addresses how one principal faced with the consolidation of three schools successfully developed trust and utilized specific leadership goals and strategies to develop a positive and cohesive school culture aimed at increasing teacher effectiveness and student achievement. While attending to trust criteria focused on ability and interpersonal skills the principal explicitly communicated and reinforced the congruence of his actions, policies, and values (APV) to help his staff quickly progress to ‘integrative’ levels of trust along the trust continuum. Working to purposefully develop the ‘strategic architecture’ of the school including relationships, culture, learning and resources, the principal’s goals and associated practices addressed the technical, intellectual, socio-emotional and socio-political dimensions of teachers’ work as identified by Bascia and Hargreaves.

Keywords

Student Achievement Elementary Teacher Succession Event School Culture Behavioural Integrity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the administrators and teachers who kindly agreed to be part of this study. This research is supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Baier, A. C. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(3), 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bascia, N., & Hargreaves, A. (2000). The sharp edge of educational change: Teaching, leading and the realities of reform. New York: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
  3. Bennis, W. (2003). On becoming a leader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  5. Bottery, M. (2003). The management and mismanagement of trust. Educational Management & Administration, 31(3), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottery, M. (2005). Trust: Its importance for educators. Management in Education, 18(5), 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bottery, M. (2007). Reports from the front line: English headteachers’ work in an era of practice centralization. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinberg, D., & McGrath, J. (1982). A network of validity concepts within the research process. In D. Brinberg & L. Kidder (Eds.), Forms of validity in research (pp. 5–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, R. O. (1972). School superintendents: Careers and performance. Columbus: Merrill.Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, R. V. (1996). Reframing and reform: Perspectives on organization. Leadership and school change. White Plains: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Covey, S. (1992). Principle-centered leadership. New York: Fireside.Google Scholar
  13. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Crow, G. (2007). The professional organizational socialization of new English headteachers in school reform contexts. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cufaude, J. (1999). Creating organizational trust. Association Management, 51(7), 26–35.Google Scholar
  16. Davenport, T., & Prusack, L. (1998). Working knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  17. Davidson, B. M., & Taylor, D. L. (1999). Examining principal succession and teacher leadership in school restructuring. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Association, Montreal, April.Google Scholar
  18. Davies, B. (2004, February). Developing the strategically focused school. School Leadership & Management, 24(1), 11–27.Google Scholar
  19. Davies, B. J., & Davies, B. (2004, February). Strategic leadership. School Leadership & Management, 24(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, B. J., & Davies, B. (2005). Strategic leadership. In B. Davies & B. Davies (Eds.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 10–30). London: Chapman.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. New York: The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, W. M. (1968). A systems model of organizational climate. In R. Tagiuri & G. H. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational climate: Explorations of a concept (pp. 107–123). Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces—The sequel. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  24. Fullan, M. (2001a). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fullan, M. (2001b). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Gabarro, J. J. (1987). The dynamics of taking charge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative trust relations (pp. 213–238). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Gephart, R. (1978). Status degradation and organization succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  30. Gordon, G., & Rosen, N. (1981). Critical factors in leadership succession. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27, 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenfield, W. (1993). Introduction. In A. Hart (Ed.), Principal succession: Establishing leadership in schools (pp. xi–xiii). Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  32. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist.Google Scholar
  33. Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relationships: In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 64–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Harmon, R., & Toomey, M. (1999). Creating a future we wish to inhabit. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith, & I. Somerville (Eds.), Leading beyond the walls (pp. 251–259). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, A. (2002) School improvement: What’s in it for schools? London: Routledge-Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hart, A. (1993). Principal succession: Establishing leadership in school. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  37. Holmes, J. G., & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1998). Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 135–157). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical conformation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9(3), 184–208.Google Scholar
  40. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Wiltkoskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1), 40–47.Google Scholar
  41. Ingstrup, O., & Crookall, P. (1998). The three pillars of public management. Montreal: McGill--Queen.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531–546.Google Scholar
  43. Joseph, E., & Winston, B. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 26(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kanter, R. M. (2004). Confidence. New York: Corwin Business.Google Scholar
  45. Kee, H. W., & Knox, R. E. (1970). Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 14, 357–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  47. Leithwood, K., & Reihl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia: Laboratory for Student Success.Google Scholar
  48. Leithwood, K., Seashore-Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Executive summary: How leadership influences student learning. Learning from Leadership Project. New York: The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  49. Levin, B. (2004). Educational policy: Commonalities and differences. In B. Davies & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational management and leadership (pp. 165–176). London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  50. Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.Google Scholar
  52. Lincoln, Y. (1997). Self, subject, audience text: Living at the edge, writing in the margins. In W. Tierney & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text (pp. 37–56). Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  53. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Louis, K. S. (2003). Trust and improvement in schools. Paper presented at BELMAS annual conference, Milton Keynes, October.Google Scholar
  55. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. MacKinnon, D. (2001). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: A critique of the Atlantic Provinces Education Foundation Program. In J. P. Portelli & R. P. Solomon (Eds.), The erosion of democracy in education (pp. 117–144). Calgary: Detselig.Google Scholar
  57. Macmillan, R., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2004). Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(4), 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Macmillan, R., Meyer, M., & Northfield, S. (2005). Principal succession and the continuum of trust in schools. In H. Armstrong (Ed.), Examining the practice of school administration in Canada (pp. 85–102). Calgary: Detselig.Google Scholar
  59. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Maxwell, J. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  62. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mishra, A. K. (1996). Organizational responses to crisis: The centrality of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 261–287). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Miskel, C., & Cosgrove, D. (1985). Leader succession in school settings. Review of Educational Research, 55, 87–105.Google Scholar
  66. Morford, L. M. (2002, April). Learning the ropes or being hung: Organizational socialization influences on new rural high school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  67. Normore, A. (2001). Recruitment, socialization, and accountability of administrators in two districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for the study of Education at the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar
  68. Normore, A. (2004). Leadership success in schools: Planning, recruitment, and socialization (Special Issue). International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 8(10).Google Scholar
  69. Northfield, S. (2002). Teachers’ perceptions of principal succession. Unpublished master’s thesis, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.Google Scholar
  70. Northfield, S. (2008). Strategic leadership for succession. The CAP Journal, 16(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  71. Northfield, S., Macmillan, R., & Meyer, M. (2006). Trust during transition: How vice-principals develop trust with new principals during principal succession. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Education Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  72. Owens, R. G. (2001). Organizational behavior in education: Instructional leadership and school reform (7th ed.). London: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  73. Reichardt, C., & Cook, T. (1979). Qualitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 93–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  76. Schneider, B. (1983). Work climates: An interactionist perspective. In N. W. Felmer & E. S. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 106–128). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  77. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1995). The principalship. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  78. Simons, T. L. (1999). Behavioral integrity as a critical ingredient for transformational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12(2), 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sparks, J. (2000). Exploring trust: A dynamic and multidimensional model of interpersonal trust development in a task setting. Dissertation Abstracts International, UMI No. 3059879.Google Scholar
  80. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tarter, C. J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W. K. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust, and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41–49.Google Scholar
  82. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Garesis, C. (2004). Principals’ sense of efficacy and trust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April, 2004.Google Scholar
  83. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547–593.Google Scholar
  84. Weindling, N., & Earley, P. (1987). Secondary headship: The first years. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of EducationSt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations