Abstract
A common, natural view about probabilities, shared by philosophers of diverse persuasions, is that probabilities are graded possibilities. On this view, which I will presuppose, there are no probabilities without underlying possibilities, and there is room for different notions of probability at least to the extent that there are different underlying notions of possibility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Belnap, N. (1992). Branching space-time. Synthese, 92:385–434.
Belnap, N. (1999). Concrete transitions. In Meggle, G., editor, Actions, Norms, Values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright, pages 227–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Belnap, N. (2002a). Double time references: Speech-act reports as modalities in an indeterminist setting. In Wolter, F., Wansing, H., de Rijke, M., and Zakharyaschev, M., editors, Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 3, pages 37–58. Singapore: World Scientific.
Belnap, N. (2002b). EPR-like “funny business” in the theory of branching spacetimes. In Placek, T. and Butterfield, J., editors, Non-locality and Modality, pages 293–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Belnap, N. (2003). No-common-cause EPR-like funny business in branching space-times. Philosophical Studies, 114:199–221.
Belnap, N. (2005). A theory of causation: Causae causantes (originating causes) as inus conditions in branching space-times. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:221–253.
Belnap, N. (2007). Propensities and probabilities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(3):593–625.
Fine, K. (2005). Modality and Tense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., editors (1984). Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
McCall, S. (1990). Choice trees. In Dunn, J. and Gupta, A., editors, Truth or Consequences. Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap, pages 231–244. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Müller, T. (2005). Probability theory and causation: A branching space-times analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:487–520.
Müller, T., Belnap, N., and Kishida, K. (2008). Funny business in branching spacetimes: infinite modal correlations. Synthese, 164:141–159.
Popper, K. (1982). Quantum Theory and the Schism of Physics. London: Hutchinson.
Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomason, R. H. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In Gabbay and Guenthner (1984), pages 135–165.
van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
Weiner, M. and Belnap, N. (2006). How causal probabilities might fit into our objectively indeterministic world. Synthese, 149:1–36.
Weyl, H. (1940). The ghost of modality. In Farber, M., editor, Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, pages 278–303. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the audience and my co-symposiasts at the ESF Workshop Physical and Philosophical Perspectives on Probability, Explanation and Time, Zeist, 20 October 2009, for helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Müller, T. (2011). Probabilities in Branching Structures. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., Weber, M. (eds) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1179-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1180-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)