Abstract
The Gibbs paradox has frequently been interpreted as a sign that particles of the same kind are fundamentally indistinguishable; and that quantum mechanics, with its identical fermions and bosons, is indispensable for making sense of this. In this article we shall argue, on the contrary, that analysis of the paradox supports the idea that classical particles are always distinguishable. Perhaps surprisingly, this analysis extends to quantum mechanics: even according to quantum mechanics there can be distinguishable particles of the same kind. Our most important general conclusion will accordingly be that the universally accepted notion that quantum particles of the same kind are necessarily indistinguishable rests on a confusion about how particles are represented in quantum theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu and Frank Laloe, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience 1978, Ch. XIV.
Dennis Dieks, “Quantum Statistics, Identical Particles and Correlations”, in: Synthese, 82, 1990, pp. 127-155.
Dennis Dieks and Marijn Versteegh, “Identical Particles and Weak Discernibility”, in: Foundations of Physics, 38, 2008, pp. 923-934.
Dennis Dieks, “Are ‘Identical Quantum Particles’ Weakly Discernible Objects?”, in: Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato and Miklos Redei (Eds.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, Volume 2. Heidelberg: Springer 2010.
Dennis Dieks and Andrea Lubberdink, “How Classical Particles Emerge From the Quantum World”, in: Foundations of Physics, 2011, to appear; DOI 10.1007/s10701-010-9515-2.
Steven French and Decio Krause, Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
Andrea Lubberdink, “Identical Particles in Quantum Mechanics”, at http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.4642
N.G. van Kampen, “The Gibbs Paradox”, in: W.E. Parry (Ed.), Essays in Theoretical Physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press 1984, pp. 303-312.
Wojciech H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical Revisited”, in: B. Duplantier, J.-M. Raimond and M. Rivasseau (Eds.), Quantum Decoherence, Poincaré Seminar 2005 (Progress in Mathematical Physics, vol. 48). Basel: Birkhäuser 2007, pp. 1-31.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dieks, D. (2011). The Gibbs Paradox Revisited. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., Weber, M. (eds) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1179-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1180-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)