Abstract
This chapter introduces place-based, Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) Platforms conceptually and in practice. LTER-Europe has put strong emphasis on utilising the data legacy and infrastructure of traditional LTER Sites for building LTSER Platforms. With their unique emphasis on socio-ecological research, LTSER Platforms add a new and important dimension to the four pillars of LTER-Europe’s science strategy (systems approach, process-oriented, long-term and site-based). In this chapter, we provide an overview of the regionalised or place-based LTSER concept, including experiences garnered from Platform models tested within LTER-Europe, and we discuss the current status of LTSER Platforms on the European continent. The experiences gathered in 6 years of practical work and development of regional socio-ecological profiles as conceptual frameworks in the Austrian Eisenwurzen LTSER Platform will be used to assess weaknesses and strengths of two implementation strategies (evolutionary vs. strategically managed) and to derive recommendations for the future. The chapter represents the close of the first substantive loop of LTSER research that began in 2003 from conceptualisation to implementation and, through the introspective analysis here, a reconsideration of the central concepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Web Links
ALTER-Net Website, accessed 2011: http://www.alter-net.info/
ICSU Website, accessed 2011: www.icsu.org
ILTER Web-site: ILTER’s aims and objectives, accessed 2011: http://www.ilternet.edu/about-ilter/mission
LTER-Europe Website, accessed 2011: http://www.lter-europe.net
LTER-Europe Website, key documents, accessed 2011: http://www.lter-europe.net/Organisation/key-documents
NUTS Website, accessed 2011: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction
US-LTER Website accessed 2011: http://www.lternet.edu/; LTER core areas accessed 2011: http://www.lternet.edu/coreareas/coreintro.htmlUS LTER review, accessed 2009: http://intranet.lternet.edu/archives/documents/reports/20_yr_review/
Other
Anon. (2009). Integrated research to support biodiversity policies: The ALTER-Net approach. ALTER-Net. Retrieved from http://www.alter-net.info. Accessed June 2011.
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duriappah, A., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., Perrings, C., Reid, W. V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R. J., & Whyte, A. (2009). Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1305–1312.
Cohen, S. (2006). Understanding environmental policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Collins, S. L., Swinton, S. M., Anderson, C. W., Benson, B. J., Brunt, J., Gragson, T. L., Grimm, N., Grove, J. M., Henshaw, D., Knapp, A. K., Kofinas, G., Magnuson, J. J., McDowell, W., Melack, J., Moore, J. C., Ogden, L., Porter, L., Reichman, J., Robertson, G. P., Smith, M. D., van de Castle, J., & Whitmer, A. C. (2007). Integrated science for society and the environment: A strategic research initiative. Albuquerque: LTER Network Office.
Collins, S. L., Carpenter, S. R., Swinton, S. M., Orenstein, D. E., Childers, D. L., Gragson, T. L., Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Harlan, S. L., Kaye, J. P., Knapp, A. K., Kofinas, G. P., Magnuson, J. J., McDowell, W. H., Melack, J. M., Ogden, L. A., Robertson, G. R., Smith, M. D., & Whitmer, A. C. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 351–357.
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37–46.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburge, K., Neem, S., O’Neil, R., Parelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, V. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–259.
Dick, J., Al-Assaf, A., Andrews, Ch., Díaz-Delgado, R., Groner, E., Halada, L., Izakovicova, Z., Kertész, M., Khoury, F., Krašić, D., Krauze, K., Matteucci, G., Melecis, V., Mirtl, M., Orenstein, D.E., Preda, E., Santos-Reis, M., Smith, R., Vadineanu, A., Veselić, S., & Vihervaara, P. (2012). Ecosystem services: A rapid assessment method tested at 35 sites of the LTER-Europe network (in preparation).
EEA. (1999). Environmental indicators: Typology and overview (Technical report No. 25). Copenhagen: EEA. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC25. Accessed June 2011.
EEA. (2010). Cultural landscapes and biodiversity heritage. Copenhagen: EEA.
Funtowitz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251–274). Westport: Praeger.
Furman, E., Peltola, T., & Varjopuro, R. (Eds.). (2009). Interdisciplinary research framework for identifying research need. Case: Bioenergy-biodiversity interlinkages. In The Finnish environment 17/2009, environmental protection. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute.
Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W.R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C. L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B., & Zechmeister, H. (2006). From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socio-economic dimension of long-term socio-ecological research. Ecology and Society, 11, 13. [Online], Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/-
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Iterland, E. C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57, 209–228.
Hobbie, J. E., Carpenter, S. R., Grimm, N. B., Gosz, J. R., & Seastedt, T. R. (2003). The U.S. long term ecological research program. BioScience, 53, 21–32.
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.
Jongman, R. H. G., Bunce, R. G. H., Metzger, M. J., Mücher, C. A., Howard, D. C., & Mateus, V. L. (2006). Objectives and applications of a statistical environmental stratification of Europe. Landscape Ecology, 21, 409–419.
Kämäräinen, P. (1999). The role of “accompanying research” within initiatives for VET development – Reflections on national and European developments. In J. Lasonen (Ed.), EERA – Network 2 programme: Network on vocational education and training research (VETNET) and academy of human resource development (AHRD) (pp. 185–198). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000001147.htm. Accessed June 2011.
Kinzig, A. P., Ryan, P., Etienne, M., Allison, H., Elmqvist, T., & Walker B. H. (2006). Resilience and regime shifts: Assessing cascading effects. Ecology and Society, 11, 20. [Online] http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art20/. Accessed June 2011.
Kosko, B. (1986). Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies, 24, 65–75.
Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1838–1846.
MEA. (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human well being – Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Metzger, M. J., & Mirtl, M. (2008). LTER Socio-Ecological Regions (LTER-SER) – Representativeness of European LTER facilities – Current state of affairs (AlterNet Technical Paper. p. 5). http://www.alter-net.info. Accessed June 2011.
Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Mücher, C. A., & Watkins, J. W. (2005). A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 14, 549–563.
Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., van Eupen, M., & Mirtl, M. (2010). An assessment of long term ecosystem research activities across European socio-ecological gradients. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1357–1365.
Mirtl, M. (2010). Introducing the next generation of ecosystem research in Europe: LTER-Europe’s multi-functional and multi-scale approach. In F. Müller, C. Baessler, H. Schubert, & S. Klotz (Eds.), Long-term ecological research: Between theory and application (pp. 75–93). Berlin: Springer.
Mirtl, M., & Krauze, K. (2007). Developing a new strategy for environmental research, monitoring and management: The European Long-Term Ecological Research Network’s (LTER-Europe) role and perspectives. In T. J. Chmielewski (Ed.), Nature conservation management – From idea to practical results. Lublin/Lodz/Hesinki/Aarhus: ALTERnet.
Mirtl, M., Boamrane ,M., Braat, L., Furman, E., Krauze, K., Frenzel, M., Gaube, V., Groner, E., Hester, A., Klotz, S., Los, W., Mautz, I., Peterseil, J., Richter, A., Schentz, H., Schleidt, K., Schmid, M., Sier, A., Stadler, J., Uhel, R., Wildenberg, M., & Zacharias, S. (2009). LTER-Europe design and implementation report – Enabling “next generation ecological science”: Report on the design and implementation phase of LTER-Europe under ALTER-Net & management plan 2009/2010. Vienna: Umweltbundesamt (Environment Agency Austria). First circulation on-line, 220 p. ISBN 978-3-99004-031-7. Retrieved from http://www.lter-europe.net. Accessed June 2011.
Mirtl, M., Bahn, M., Battin, T., Borsdorf, A., Englisch, M., Gaube, V., Grabherr, G., Gratzer, G., Haberl, H., Kreiner, D., Richter, A., Schindler, S., Tappeiner, U., Winiwarter, V., & Zink, R. (2010). Next generation LTER in Austria – On the status and orientation of process oriented ecosystem research, biodiversity and conservation research and socio-ecological research in Austria. LTER-Austria Series (Vol. 1). Retrieved from http://www.lter-austria.at. Accessed June 2011.
Nelson, G. C. (2011). Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: Better data, better accounting and better technology will help. BioScience, 61, 9–10.
Özesmi, U., & Özesmi, S. L. (2004). Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecological Modelling, 176, 43–64.
Pickett, S. T. A., Burch, W. R., & Grove, M. (1999). Interdisciplinary research: Maintaining the constructive impulse in a culture of criticism. Ecosystems, 2, 302–307.
Putzhuber, F., & Hasenauer, H. (2010). Deriving sustainability measures using statistical data: A case study from the Eisenwurzen, Austria. Ecological Indicators, 10, 32–38.
Redman, C. L., Grove, J. M., & Kuby, L. H. (2004). Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems, 7, 161–171.
Shibata, H., & Bourgeron, P. (2011). Challenge of international long-term ecological research network (ILTER) for socio-ecological land sciences. Global Land Project NEWS, 7, 13–14. Retrieved from, http://www.globallandproject.org/Newsletters/GLP_NEWS_07.pdf
Singh, S. J., Haberl, H., Gaube, V., Grünbühel, C. M., Lisivieveci, P., Lutz, J., Matthews, R., Mirtl, M., Vadineanu, A., & Wildenberg, M. (2010). Conceptualising Long-term Socio-ecological Research (LTSER): Integrating socio-economic dimensions into long-term ecological research. In F. Müller, C. Baessler, H. Schubert, & S. Klotz (Eds.), Long-term ecological research: Between theory and application (pp. 377–398). Berlin: Springer.
WCED. (1987). Our common future (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wildenberg, M., Bachhofer, M., Adamescu, M., De Blust, G., Diaz-Delagdo, R., Isak, K., Skov, F., & Varjopuro, R. (2010). Linking thoughts to flows – Fuzzy cognitive mapping as tool for integrated landscape modelling. Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on integrative landscape modelling – Linking environmental, social and computer sciences. Symposcience, Cemagref, Cirad, Ifremer, Inra, Montpellier.
Wrbka, T., Erb, K.-H., Schulz, N. B., Peterseil, J., Hahn, C., & Haberl, H. (2004). Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes: An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy, 21, 289–306.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the LTSER communities in about 20 European countries for their enthusiasm in jointly developing and spreading a new scientific working culture and – at the same time – do appreciate their efforts in setting up LTSER Platforms in spite of all constraints related to the fact that LTSER is not yet rewarded by traditional scientific performance evaluations. The experiences of this group form the backbone of this chapter. Our thanks go also to our international – and especially US American – colleagues for an inspiring exchange of ideas and scientific cooperation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mirtl, M., Orenstein, D.E., Wildenberg, M., Peterseil, J., Frenzel, M. (2013). Development of LTSER Platforms in LTER-Europe: Challenges and Experiences in Implementing Place-Based Long-Term Socio-ecological Research in Selected Regions. In: Singh, S., Haberl, H., Chertow, M., Mirtl, M., Schmid, M. (eds) Long Term Socio-Ecological Research. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1177-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1177-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1176-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1177-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)