Skip to main content

Developing the Human and Physical Infrastructure for Nanoscale Science and Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020

Part of the book series: Science Policy Reports ((SCIPOLICY,volume 1))

Abstract

In 2000, the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) Implementation Plan [1] recognized that nanoscale science and engineering education is vital to U.S. economic development, public welfare, and quality of life. But the Nanotechnology Research Directions report’s vision for education and physical infrastructure only addressed (a) the need for a multidisciplinary university community based on the unitary concepts in nanoscale science and engineering, and (b) the need to enhance access to fabrication, processing, and characterization equipment ([2], p. 153). As described in Sect. 2, considerable progress has been made toward – and beyond – that early vision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     These numbers are based on a simple keyword “nano*” search of the Thompson ISI Web of Science database; while easy to perform, this search generally undercounts the number of pertinent publications.

  2. 2.

     This count is based on a keyword “nano* AND medic* OR nano* AND bio*” search of the Thompson ISI Web of Science database.

  3. 3.

    http://www.magforce.de/english/home1.html

  4. 4.

     Flagg, B. Nanotechnology and the Public, Part 1 of Front-End Analysis in Support of Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network, 2005, http://informalscience.org/evaluations/report_149.pdf.

  5. 5.

     Nanomaterials and Human Health & Instrumentation, Metrology, and Analytical Methods (November 17–18, 2009); Nanomaterials and the Environment & Instrumentation, Metrology, and Analytical Methods (October 6–7, 2009); Nanotechnology-Enabled Sensing (May 5–7, 2009); X-Rays and Neutrons: Essential Tools for Nanoscience Research (June 16–18, 2005); Nanotechnology Instrumentation and Metrology (January 27–29, 2004). See http://www.nano.gov/html/res/pubs.html for associated publications.

  6. 6.

     NIST Workshop on Instrumentation, Metrology, and Standards for Nanomanufacturing (Oct. 17–19, 2006); NNI Workshop on Instrumentation and Metrology for Nanotechnology (Jan. 27–29, 2004); NNI Workshop, Research Directions II (Sept. 8–10, 2004); Chemical Industry R&D Roadmap for Nanomaterials by Design (30 Sept.–2 Oct. 2002).

  7. 7.

     Buildings for Advanced Technology”, pending report from the NNI workshops in 2003, 2004 and 2006.

References

  1. NSTC/NSET, The National Nanotechnology Initiative: The Initiative and its Implementation Plan. (National Science and Technology Council, Washington, DC, July 2000). Available online: http://www.nano.gov/node/243

  2. M.C. Roco, R.S. Williams, P. Alivisatos (eds.), Nanotechnology research directions: Vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade (1999). Available online: http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/IWGN.Research.Directions/

  3. Members of the 2005 “Rising Above the Gathering Storm” Committee, Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010). ISBN 10: 0-309-16097-9

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Science Board (2010), Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators: Identifying and Developing Our Nation’s Human Capital, Arlington VA, National Science Foundation (NSB 10–33).

    Google Scholar 

  5. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), Report to the President and Congress on the third assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, 2010). Available online: http://www.nano.gov/html/res/otherpubs.html

  6. M.C. Roco, Nanotechnology: A frontier for engineering education. Int. J. Eng. Ed. 18(5), 488–497 (2002), Available online: http://www.ijee.dit.ie/articles/Vol18-5/IJEE1316.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Murday. NSF workshop report: Partnership in nanotechnology education, Los Angeles, 26–28 April 2009, Available online: http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/educ09_murdyworkshop.pdf

  8. M.C. Roco, Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education. Keynote presentation at the workshop Partnership for Nanotechnology Education, Los Angeles, 26 April 2009, Available online: http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/nni_09_0426_nanoeduc_usc_35sl.pdf

  9. M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge (eds.), Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003). Available on line: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_report.pdf

  10. J.S. Murday, R.W. Siegel, J. Stein, J.F. Wright, Translational nanomedicine: Status assessment and opportunities. Nanomedicine 5, 251–273 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Project NanoRoadSME (EU Sixth Framework Programme), Roadmap report concerning the use of nanomaterials in the medical and health sector (2006). Available online: http://www.nanoroad.net/index.php?topic=indapp#hm

  12. K. Riehmann, S.W. Schneider, T.A. Luger, B. Godin, M. Ferrari, H. Fuchs, Nanomedicine—challenge and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 872–897 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. NSTC/NSET, Nanotechnology and the environment. Report of the NNI Workshop, 8–9 May 2003, Arlington. Available online: http://www.nano.gov/NNI_Nanotechnology_and_the_Environment.pdf

  14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Research advancing green manufacturing of nanotechnology products (2009), Available online: http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/quickfinder/green.htm

  15. B. Karn, T. Kuiken, M. Otto. Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: A review of the benefits and potential risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 117(12), 1823–1831 (2009), Available online: http://www.nano.gov/html/about/symposia.html

  16. Nanotechnology, Science, and Engineering Subcommittee of the Committee on Technology of the National Science and Technology Council (NSET), National Nanotechnology Initiative: Supplement to the President’s FY 2011 Budget. (NSET, Washington, DC, 2010), Available online: http://www.nano.gov/html/res/pubs.html

  17. M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge (eds.), Nanotechnology: Societal implications (Springer, New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NCLT) (2006) Nanoconcepts in higher education. Presentations and findings of the second annual NCLT faculty workshop, 6–9 August 2006, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, Available online: http://www.nclt.us/workshop/ws-faculty-aug06.shtml

  19. National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NCLT) (2008a). Best practices in nano-education. Presentations of the third annual NCLT faculty workshop, 26–29 March 2008, Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, Available online: http://www.nclt.us/workshop/ws-faculty-mar08.shtml

  20. National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Education (NCLT), (2008b) Report of the global nanoscale science and engineering education workshop, Washington, DC, 13–14 Nov 2008, Available online: http://www.nclt.us/gnseews2008/

  21. Hart Research Associates. Nanotechnology, synthetic biology, & public opinion: A report of findings based on a national survey of adults (2009), Available online: http://www.nanotechproject.org/publications/archive/8286/

  22. B. Flagg, V. Knight-Williams. Summative evaluation of NISE Network’s public forum: Nanotechnology in health care (2008), Available online: http://www.nisenet.org/catalog/evaluation/summative_evaluation_nise_networks_public_forum_nanotechnology_health_care

  23. D. Berube, C. Cummings, J. Frith, A. Binder, R. Oldendick. Contextualizing nanoparticle risk perceptions. J. Nanopart. Res. (2010 Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.W. Dugan, R.P.H. Chang, Cascade approach to learning nano science and engineering: A project of the National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering. J. Mater. Educ. 32(1–2), 21–28 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Science Foundation (NSF). GK-12: Graduate STEM Fellows in K-12 Education (2010a), http://www.nsfgk12.org/

  26. National Science Foundation (NSF), IGERT: Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (2010b). Available online: http://www.igert.org/

  27. Carnegie Corporation of New York and Institute for Advanced Study (Carnegie-IAS), The Opportunity Equation: Transforming Mathematics and Science Education for Citizenship and the Global Economy. (Carnegie Corporation of New York-Institute for Advanced Study Commission on Mathematics and Science Education, New York, 2009), Available online: http://www.OpportunityEquation.org

  28. National Governors Association (NGA), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), and Achieve, Inc., Benchmarking for success: Ensuring U.S. students receive a world-class education (2008), Available online: http://www.nga.org/Files/pdf/0812benchmarking.pdf

  29. S. Sjoberg, C. Schreiner, The next generation of citizens: Attitudes to science among youngsters, in The Culture of Science—How Does the Public Relate to Science Across the Globe? ed. by M. Bauer, R. Shukl (Routledge, New York, 2010), Available online: http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/.

  30. National Research Council (NRC) National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Science Education Standards (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. C.J. Lee, D.A. Scheufele, The influence of knowledge and deference toward scientific authority: A media effects model for public attitudes toward nanotechnology. J. Mass Commun. Q. 83(4), 819–834 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Tapscott, Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world (McGraw Hill, Columbus, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. X. Li, H. Chen, Y. Dang, Y. Lin, C.A. Larson, M.C. Roco, A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature, 1976–2004. J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 3–22 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. National Science Foundation (NSF). NSF’s Cyberinfrastructure vision for 21st century discover (2008), Available online: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf0728/index.jsp

  35. P.M. Hallacher, S.J. Fonash, D.E. Fenwick, The Pennsylvania Nanofabrication Manufacturing Technology (NMT) partnership: Resource sharing for nanotechnology workforce development. Int. J. Eng. Ed. 18(5), 526–531 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. S.J. Fonash, Nanotechnology and economic resiliency. Nanotoday 4(4), 290–291 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. G.P. Lansbergen, R. Rahman, C.J. Wellard, I. Woo, J. Caro, N. Collaert, S. Biesemans, G. Klimeck, L.C.L. Hollenberg, S. Rogge, Gate-induced quantum-confinement transition of a single dopant atom in a silicon FinFET. Nat. Phys. 4, 656–661 (2008). doi:10.1038/nphys994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Wang, S.H. Lau, A. Tkachuk, F. Druewer, H. Chang, M. Feser, W. Yun, Nano-destructive 3D imaging of nano-structures with multi-scale X-ray microscopy, in Nanotechnology 2008: Materials, Fabrication, Particles, and Characterization. Technical proceedings of the 2008 NSTI nanotechnology conference and trade show, Vol. 1 (Nano Science and Technology Institute, Cambridge, 2008), pp. 822–825, Available online: http://www.nsti.org/procs/Nanotech2008v1

  39. M.T. Postek, A.E. Vladar, Helium ion microscopy and its application to nanotechnology and nanometrology. Scanning 30(6), 457–462 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S.V. Sreenivasan, Nanoscale manufacturing enabled by imprint lithography. MRS Bull. 33(9), 854–863 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Hullmann. A European strategy for nanotechnology. Paper presented at the conference on nanotechnology in science, economy, and society, Marburg, 13–15 Jan 2005

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Morrison (ed.). Sixth nanoforum report: European nanotechnology infrastructure and networks (2005), Available online: http://www.nanoforum.org/dateien/temp/European%20Nanotechnology%20Infrastructures%20and%20Networks%20July%202005.pdf?05082005163735

  43. H. Dosch, M. Van de Voorde, Gennesys White Paper: A New European Partnership Between Nanomaterials Science and Nanotechnology and Synchrotron Radiation and Neutron Facilities. (MPI Inst. Metals Research, Stuttgart, 2009), Available online: http://mf.mpg.de/mpg/websiteMetallforschung/english/veroeffentlichungen/GENNESYS/

  44. World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC) (2010), Long-term impacts and future opportunities for nanoscale science and engineering nanotechnology. Workshop held on 9–10 March 2010, Evanston

    Google Scholar 

  45. C.-K. Lee, T.-T. Wu, P.-L. Liu, A. Hsu, Establishing a K-12 nanotechnology program for teacher professional development. IEEE Trans. Educ. 49(1), 141–146 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M.C. Roco, International perspective on government nanotechnology funding in 2005. J. Nanopart. Res. 7, 707–712 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. J. Hirabayashi, L. Lopez, M. Phillips, The development of the NISE network A summary report (Part I of the summative report of the NISE Network evaluation). Inverness Research, May 2009, Available online: http://www.nisenet.org/catalog/assets/documents/overviewnise-network-evaluation

  48. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators (2010), Arlington, VA, National Science Foundation (NSB10–01)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pew, Ideological News Sources: Who Watches and Why. Americans Spending More Time Following the News (2010). http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1725/where-people-get-news-print-online-readership-cable-news-viewers?src=prc-latest&proj=forum

  50. Pew, Audience Segments in a Changing News Environment Key News Audiences Now Blend Online and Traditional Sources. Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey, http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_report_detail.aspx?id=42644

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Murday .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murday, J., Hersam, M., Chang, R., Fonash, S., Bell, L. (2011). Developing the Human and Physical Infrastructure for Nanoscale Science and Engineering. In: Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. Science Policy Reports, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1168-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics