Advertisement

Metalogue: Engaging Students in Scientific and Socio-scientific Argumentation

  • Victor SampsonEmail author
  • Shirley Simon
  • Ruth Amos
  • Maria Evagorou
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education book series (CTISE, volume 39)

Abstract

Evagorou: In this chapter, Shirley and Ruth raise several interesting issues related to (socio-scientific issues) SSI, argumentation, and decision-making. A major question in this study was the quality of students’ arguments, and if there is a link between the nature of the evidence (e.g., scientific, environmental, financial) and the quality of the arguments. The results are not conclusive as to this point, and the authors suggest that more evidence is necessary.

Keywords

Scientific Argumentation Argumentation Skill Criterion Student Imaginary Scenario Authentic Learning Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Berland, L., & Reiser, B. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Erduran, S. (2008). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 47–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Kolstoe, S. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689–1716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. López-Facal, R., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Identities, social representations and critical thinking. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4(3), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Ideas, evidence and argument in science. In-service training pack, resource pack and video. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Sampson, V., & Gerbino, F. (2010). Two instructional models that teachers can use to promote and support scientific argumentation in the biology classroom. American Biology Teacher, 72(7), 427–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4(3), 705–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation; research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Simon, S., & Richardson, K. (2009). Argumentation in school science: Breaking the tradition of authoritative exposition through a pedagogy that promotes discussion and reasoning. Argumentation, 23, 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Venville, G., & Dawson, V. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V.  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Sampson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shirley Simon
    • 2
  • Ruth Amos
    • 2
  • Maria Evagorou
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Teacher Education and the FSU-Teach programFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of EducationUniversity of Nicosia (UNic)NicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations