Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New ICMI Study Series ((NISS,volume 14))

Abstract

The introduction of statistics and probability into the school curriculum has raised awareness of the expectations on teachers who have to teach it. A review of the related field of mathematics education indicates that teachers need more than content knowledge. They must also respond to their students’ statistical understandings in ways that move students’ current understanding to higher levels. Efforts to measure such statistical pedagogical content knowledge are still in their infancy. Findings from a large-scale Australian study are reported to exemplify these efforts, and the implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Carlton, VIC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, A. (1993). Establishing a research agenda for statistics education. In L. Pereira-Mendoza (Ed.), Introducing data analysis in the schools: Who should teach it and how? (pp. 212–218). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callingham, R., & Watson J. M. (2007, December). Overcoming research design issues using Rasch measurement: The StatSmart project. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education International Educational Research Conference 2007, Fremantle, Australia. Online: www.aare.edu.au/07pap/cal07042.pdf

  • Chick, H. L. (2007). Teaching and learning by example. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 3–21). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, R. E. (2007). Toward a conceptualisation of statistical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 427–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, A. (Ed.). (1990). Training teachers to teach statistics: Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute Round Table Conference. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, R., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–156). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P. (1980). Teaching statistics 11–16. Slough, UK: Schools Council and Foulsham Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration [computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, A., & Rosebery, A. S. (1990). Teachers’ misunderstandings in statistical reasoning: Evidence from a field test of innovative materials. In A. Hawkins (Ed.), Training teachers to teach statistics: Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute Round Table Conference (pp. 72–89). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Tatto, M. T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Gogan, L., et al. (2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries (MT21 report). East Lansing, MI: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Training and Development Agency for Schools. (2009). Numeracy practice materials. Online: www.tda.gov.uk/skillstests/numeracy/practicematerials.aspx

  • Watson, J. M. (2001). Profiling teachers’ competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4, 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M., Callingham, R., & Donne, J. (2008). Establishing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications

  • Watson, J. M., Callingham, R., & Nathan, E. (2009). Probing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in statistics: “How will Tom get to school tomorrow?” In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 563–570). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by an Australian Research Council, Grant No. LP0669106, with Linkage Partners the Australian Bureau of Statistics, Key Curriculum Press, and the Baker Centre for School Mathematics at Prince Alfred College, Adelaide.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosemary Callingham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Callingham, R., Watson, J. (2011). Measuring Levels of Statistical Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics