Abstract
To teach statistics effectively teachers need to have a well-developed knowledge of distribution. As a key concept in an intricate web of statistical knowledge, distribution depends on, and is depended on by many other statistical concepts. Various frameworks have been developed as researchers strive to describe the cognitive development of knowledge of distribution. Considering the professional learning continuum that a teacher needs to traverse, research studies are reported that have focused, from the perspective of teachers as learners, on the development of teacher knowledge of distribution both before teaching and while teaching. Recommendations are made for teacher learning and future research into teachers’ knowledge of distribution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Afamasaga-Fuata’i, K., & Reading, C. (2007). Using concept maps to assess pre-service teachers’ understanding of connections between statistical concepts. In B. Phillips & L. Weldon (Eds.), Assessing student learning in statistics: Proceedings of the IASE/ISI Satellite Conference on Statistical Education. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
Bakker, A. (2004). Reasoning about shape as a pattern in variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 64–83. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 327–352). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds.). (2008). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
Batanero, C., Tauber, L. M., & Sanchez, V. (2004). Students’ reasoning about the normal distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Canada, D. (2008). Conceptions of distribution held by middle school students and preservice teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
Canada, D., & Ciancetta, M. (2007). Elementary preservice teachers’ informal conceptions of distribution. In T. Lamberg & L. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 960–967). Lake Tahoe, NV: University of Nevada, Reno.
Chance, B., delMas, R., & Garfield, J. (2004). Reasoning about sampling distributions. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 295–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Ciancetta, M. (2007). Students’ reasoning when comparing distributions of data. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Portland State University, Portland.
Franklin, C. A., & Garfield, J. (2006). The GAISE Project: Developing statistical education guidelines for grades pre-K-12 and college courses. In G. F. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with chance and data: 68th NCTM Yearbook (2006) (pp. 345–375). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Friel, S. N., O’Connor, W., & Mamer, J. D. (2006). More than “meanmodemedian” and a bar graph: What’s needed to have a statistical conversation? In G. F. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with chance and data: 68th NCTM Yearbook (2006) (pp. 117–137). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Garfield, J. B., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. New York: Springer.
Hammerman, J., & Rubin, A. (2004). Strategies for managing statistical complexity with new software tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 17–41. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Kadijevich, D. (2008). Towards a suitably designed instruction on statistical reasoning: Understanding sampling distribution through technology. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
Leavy, A. (2006). Using data comparisons to support a focus on distribution: Examining preservice teachers’ understandings of distribution when engaged in statistical inquiry. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 27–45. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Madden, S. (2008). High school mathematics teachers’ evolving understanding of comparing distributions. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.
Makar, K., & Canada, D. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of variation. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 273–280). Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
Makar, K. M., & Confrey, J. (2004). Secondary teachers’ reasoning about comparing two groups. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 327–352). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
McClain, K. (2008). The evolution of teachers’ understandings of distribution. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
Mickelson, W., & Heaton, R. (2004). Primary teachers’ statistical reasoning about data. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 327–352). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Pfannkuch, M. (2006). Comparing box plot distributions: A teacher’s reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 27–45. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Pfannkuch, M., & Reading, C. (2006). Reasoning about distribution: A complex process. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 4–9. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Prodromou, T., & Pratt, D. (2006). The role of causality in the co-ordination of two perspectives on distribution within a virtual simulation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 69–88. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Reading, C., & Reid, J. (2006). An emerging hierarchy of reasoning about distribution: From a variation perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 46–68. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957–1010). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Watson, J. (2001). Profiling teachers’ competence and confidence to teach particular mathematics topics: The case of chance and data. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(2), 1–33.
Wild, C. (2006). The concept of distribution. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 10–26. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reading, C., Canada, D. (2011). Teachers’ Knowledge of Distribution. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1130-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1131-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)