Abstract
In this chapter, a question is posed about the link between two traditional approaches to the notion of probability, classical (or Laplacian) and frequentist, in secondary teaching. Different conceptions of probability, objective and subjective, are considered, some didactical difficulties of the frequentist option are underlined, and the modelling view point is presented. A critical description of a modelling process of a random situation for teachers’ training in secondary teaching is proposed and it is developed for the example of a queue. Finally, the status of simulations on computers in classrooms is clarified and their didactical relevance is highlighted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, J. (2006). Interpreting probabilities and teaching the subjective viewpoint. In G. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance: 68th NCTM Yearbook (2006) (pp. 417–433). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C., & Rossman, A. (Eds.) (2008). Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and International Association for Statistical Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 20–42). New York: Springer.
Batanero, C., & Sanchez, E. (2005). What is the nature of high school students’ conceptions and misconceptions about probability? In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 241–266). New York: Springer.
Biehler, R. (1991). Computers in probability education. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 169–212). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Biembengut, M. S. (2007). Modelling and applications in primary education. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI Study (pp. 451–456). New York: Springer.
Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H. W., & Niss, M. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI Study. New York: Springer.
Borovcnik, M., Bentz, H. J., & Kapadia, R. (1991). A probabilistic perspective. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 27–73). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Burrill, G. (2002). Simulation as a tool to develop statistical understanding. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Cape Town, South Africa: International Statistical Institute and International Association for Statistics Education. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
Carranza, P., & Kuzniak, A. (2008). Duality of probability and statistics teaching in French education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
De Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. A critical introductory treatment. New York: Wiley.
De Moivre, A. (1967). The Doctrine of chances: or a method of calculating the probabilities of events in play. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company (Original work published in 1756, London: A. Millar).
Garuti, R., Orlandoni, A., & Ricci, R. (2008). Which probability do we have to meet ? A case study about statistical and classical approach to probability in students’ behaviour. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
Girard, J. C. (2001). Quelques hypothèses sur les difficultés rencontrées dans l’enseignement des probabilités (Some hypotheses on difficulties coming across probability teaching). In Autour de la modélisation en probabilités (pp. 189–200). Besançon, France: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
Girard, J. C. (2004). La liaison statistique-probabilités dans l’enseignement (The link statistics-probability in teaching). Repères-IREM, 57, 83–91.
Groupe d’Experts sur les Programmes Scolaires, Direction de l’Enseignement Scolaire (2001). Accompagnement des programmes de mathématiques, classe de Première des séries générales (Support of mathematics curricula, First class of the general series). Paris: Centre National de Documentation Pédagogique (CNDP). Online: www.sceren.fr/produits/detailsimp.asp?ID=84491
Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Henry, M. (1999). L’introduction des probabilités au lycée: Un processus de modélisation comparable à celui de la géométrie (Introduction of probability in high school: A modelling process comparable with geometry teaching). Repères-IREM, 36, 15–34.
Henry, M. (2001a). Notion d’expérience aléatoire, vocabulaire et modèle probabiliste (Notion of random experiment, vocabulary and probabilistic model). In Autour de la modélisation en probabilités (pp. 225–232). Besançon, France: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
Henry, M. (2001b). Construction d’un modèle de Poisson (Construction of a Poisson’s model). In Autour de la modélisation en probabilités (pp. 161–172). Besançon, France: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté.
Kahane, J. P. (2002) (Ed.), L’enseignement des sciences mathématiques: Rapport au Ministre de l’Éducation Nationale de la Commission de Réflexion sur l’Enseignement des Mathématiques (Mathematics science teaching: Report to the National Education Minister from the Commission of Reflection on the Teaching of Mathematics). Paris: Odile Jacob.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty, heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.
Lecoutre, M.-P., & Fischbein, E. (1998). Évolution avec l’âge de “misconceptions” dans les intuitions probabilistes en France et en Israël (Evolution with the age of probabilistic intuitively based misconceptions in France and in Israel). Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 18(3), 311–332.
Mills, J. D. (2002). Using computer simulation methods to teach statistics: A review of the literature. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(1). Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/
Parzysz, B. (2009). Des expériences au modèle, via la simulation (From experiences to a model, via simulation). Repères-IREM, 74, 91–103.
Renyi, A. (1992). Calcul des probabilités (Probability calculus). Paris: Jacques Gabay (Original work published in 1966).
Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 221–248.
Zieffler, A., & Garfield, J. B. (2007). Studying the role of simulation in developing students’ statistical reasoning. In Proceedings of the 56th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Lisboa, 22–29 August 2007. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute. Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chaput, B., Girard, JC., Henry, M. (2011). Frequentist Approach: Modelling and Simulation in Statistics and Probability Teaching. In: Batanero, C., Burrill, G., Reading, C. (eds) Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics-Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. New ICMI Study Series, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-1130-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1131-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)