Abstract
This paper considers how state educational policy and other sociocon-textual factors influence primary schooling in two large developing countries. In the late 1940s, national statistics for primary school enrolment and other human development indicators were comparable between China and India. Both countries then experienced major political transitions and embraced similar economic development priorities. Half a century later, reports prepared for the 2000 World Education Forum indicate that China had far outperformed India in terms of school enrolment ratios and on indices of the efficiency of primary education. This article considers the reasons for these differences. It discusses the role of the state, educational policy and its implementation, linkages among educational, economic and social policies, cultural belief systems that are relevant to education, classroom teaching and learning, teacher characteristics, and the physical conditions of schools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acharya, A., Baru, R.V. and Nambissan, G.B. 2001. The State and Human Development. In: G.P. Deshpande and A. Acharya, eds., Crossing a Bridge of Dreams: Fifty Years of India and China (203-267). New Delhi: Tulika.
Bray, M. 1996. Counting the Full Cost: Parental and Community Financing of Education in East Asia. Washington DC: The World Bank in collaboration with UNICEF.
Bray, M. and Borevskaya, N. 2001. Financing Education in Transitional Societies: Lessons from Russia and China. Comparative Education 37(3): 345-365.
Carron, G. and Ta Ngoc, C. 1996. The Quality of Primary Schools in Different Developmental Contexts. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Cheng, K.M. 1996. The Quality of Primary Education: A Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Cheng, K.M. 1997. Markets - Stability or Threat: Implication for Education in China. Paper presented at the Oxford International Conference on Education and Development. UK Forum on International Education and Training, Oxford.
Cheng, K.M. 1998. Planning of Basic Education in China: Culture's Implications. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration 7(4): 387-401.
Cheng, K.M. 2000a. Education and Development: The Neglected Mission of Cross- cultural Studies. In: R. Alexander, M. Osborn and D. Phillip, eds., Learning from Comparing: New Directions in Comparative Educational Research. Vol. 2 Policy, Professionals and Development (81-92). Oxford: Symposium Books.
Cheng, K.M. 2000b. Understanding Basic Education Policies in China: An Ethnographic Approach. In: J. Liu, H.A. Ross and D.P. Kelly, eds., The Ethnographic Eye: An Interpretative Study of Education in China (29-50). New York: Falmer Press.
Chung, T. 1998. Education in China Through Indian Eyes. In: S. Bhattacharya, ed., The Contested Terrain: Perspectives on Education in India (380-409). New Delhi: Orient Longman.
Croll, E. 2000. Redressing the Balance: Recent Steps to Counter Discrimination Against Girls. China Review 16. Retrieved 22 September 2001 from the worldwide web: http://www.gbcc.org.uk/croll16.htm.
Drèze, J. and Loh, J. 1995. Literacy in India and China. Economic and Political Weekly November 11.
Drèze, J. and Sen, A. 1995. Basic Education as a Political Issue. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration 9: 1-26.
GOC, Government of the People's Republic of China. 2000. Education For All: The Year 2000 Assessment Final Country Report of China. Beijing: Government of the People's Republic of China.
GOI, Government of India. 1986a. National Policy on Education. New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 1986b. Programme of Action. New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 1992a. National Policy on Education. New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 1992b. Programme of Action. New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 1997. Ninth Five-Year Plan (1997-2002). New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 2000. Education for All: The Year 2000 Assessment Final Country Report of India. New Delhi: Government of India.
GOI, Government of India. 2001. Census of India, 2001. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General, India. Retrieved 4 December 2001 from the worldwide web: http://www.censusindia.net/results/resultsmain.html.
Govinda, R. and Varghese, N.V. 1993. Quality of Primary Schooling in India: A Case Study of Madhya Pradesh. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning.
Law, A. and Cheng, K.M. 2001. How Educational Reform Affects Teaching: Evidence from Rural China. Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of Comparative Education Societies (WCCES).
LeVine, R.A., Le Vine, S.E. and Schnell, B. 2001. “Improve the Women”: Mass Schooling, Female Literacy, and Worldwide Social Change. Harvard Educational Review 71: 1-50.
Mehta, A.C. 2001. Education for All in India with Focus on Elementary Education: Current Status, Recent Initiatives and Future Prospects. Retrieved 17 February 2002 from the worldwide web: http://www.arunmehta.freeyellow.com/pagel01.htm.
PROBE 1999. Public Report on Basic Education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Rao, N. and Cheng, K.M. 2001. Socio-contextual influences on teaching mathematics: Lessons from Indian classrooms. Paper presented at the 11th World Congress of Comparative Education Societies (WCCES).
Rao, N. and Cheng, K.M. 2002. Understanding the Social Context of Teaching, Learning and Achievement: A Comparison of Chinese and Indian Primary Schools. Working paper. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong.
Rao, N., McHale, J.P. and Pearson, E. in press. Links between Socialization Goals and Child-rearing Practices in Chinese and Indian Mothers. Infant and Child Development.
Rao, N. and Sharma, A. 2002. Early Childhood Services in India: Challenges and Prospects for their Development. In: L.K.S. Chan and E. Mellor, eds., International Developments in Early Childhood Services (97-117). New York: Peter Lang.
Tilak, J.B.G. 1990. The Political Economy of Education in India. New York: State University of New York (SUNY) - Buffalo, Comparative Education Center (Vol. 24, Comparative Education Series).
UNDP 2001. Human Development Report 2001. New York: Oxford University Press.
UNESCO 2000. World Education Report 2000. The Right to Education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNICEF 1999. Focus on China. The State of the World's Children. New York: UNICEF.
Wiener, M. 1991. The Child and the State in India: Child Labor and Education Policy in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
World Bank 1991. China: Provincial Education Planning and Finance -Sector Study. Washington DC: World Bank, East Asia and Pacific Regional Office, Country Department III.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rao, N., Cheng, KM., Narain, K. (2003). Primary Schooling in China and India: Understanding How Socio-Contextual Factors Moderate the Role of the State. In: Bray, M. (eds) Comparative Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1094-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1094-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1143-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1094-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive