Abstract
As the field of argumentation has moved from a formal to an informal or dialectical perspective, it has also, often without conscious recognition, adopted some of the interests traditionally associated with rhetoric. So long as arguments were conceived on the formal deductive model, social and contextual considerations were regarded as irrelevant. An argument was to be judged on the content and formal relationship of the propositions it contained and appeals to such contextual matters as the credibility of the arguer were regarded as fallacies. With the rise of informal logic, however, the essentialism of the formal deductive model gave way to a more practical conception of argumentation that recognized argument as a social practice and that encompassed consideration of the persons who engaged in it and the circumstances surrounding its conduct. Appeals to context that were once categorically dismissed as fallacies have been reconceived as strategies or schemes that can have legitimate uses, and informal logic (or dialectic as some have called the new approach) has addressed matters that fall squarely within the traditional domain of rhetoric, since circumstances such as time, place, occasion, persons, and the like have always been regarded as proper, if not necessary, considerations in rhetorical studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bass, SJ. (2001). Blessed Are the Peacemakers: Martin Luther King, Jr., Eight White Religious Leaders and the ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State.
Brinton, A. (1985). A rhetorical view of the ad hominem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 63, 50–63.
Brinton, A (1986). Ethotic argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly. 3, 245–258.
Branch, T. (1988). Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954-63. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Clark, E.C. (1993). An American dilemma in King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail.’ In C.C. Calloway-Thomas and J.L. Lucaites (Eds.), Martin Luther King and the Sermonic Power of Public Discourse (pp. 34–49, Ch. 2), Tuscaloosa: Alabama.
Eemeren, F.H. van and Peter Houtlosser. (1999). Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies. 1, 479–497.
Fulkerson, R.P. (1979). The public letter as a rhetorical form: structure, logic, and style in King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail.’ Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65, 121–136.
Garrow. D.J. (1986). Bearing the Cross: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Southern Leadership Conference. New York: Vintage.
Govier, T. (1999). Political speech, Oliver Sachs, and the credibility concern. In J. Hoagland (Ed.), The Philosophy of Argument (pp. 13–24, Ch. 2), Newport News: Vale.
Jost, W. and M.J. Hyde. (1997). Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time: A Reader. New Haven: Yale.
King, M.L. (1986). Letter from Birmingham Jail. In J.M. Washington (Ed.), I Have a Dream: Writings and Speeches that Changed the World (pp. 84–100, Ch. 10). San Francisco: Harper.
Klein, M. (1981). The other beauty of Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail.’ College Composition and Communication, 32, 30–37.
McWhorter, D. (2001). Carry Me Home: Birmingham, Alabama The Climactic Battle of the Civil Rights Revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rescher, N. (1998). The role of rhetoric in rational argumentation. In H.V. Hansen, C.W. Tindale, and A. Colman (Eds.), Argumentation and Rhetoric. St. Catherines: OSSA.
Tindale, C.W. (1999). Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument Albany: SUNY.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leff, M. (2003). Rhetoric and Dialectic in Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter From Birmingham Jail’. In: Van Eemeren, F.H., Blair, J.A., Willard, C.A., Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (eds) Anyone Who Has a View. Argumentation Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1456-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1078-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive