Abstract
As the only two philosophical languages to be completed in the seventeenth century are the outcome of an initially collabrative project, it is quite understandable that they bear a number of obvious resemblances. As has been argued, an exclusive focus on similarities between the two schemes is however likely to obfuscate a clear picture of the debate on universal language carried on in the period. Now that both languages have been described in some detail, some differences and similarities may be summed up.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maat, J. (2004). Concluding Remarks. In: Philosophical Languages in the Seventeenth Century: Dalgarno, Wilkins, Leibniz. The New Synthese Historical Library, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1036-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1036-8_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3771-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-1036-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive