Abstract
This study describes the development of a macroinvertebrate based multimetric index for two stream types, fast and slow running streams, in the Netherlands within the AQEM project. Existing macroinvertebrate data (949 samples) were collected from these stream types from all over the Netherlands. All sites received a ecological quality (post-)classification ranging from 1 (bad status) to 4 (good status) based on biotic and abiotic variables, using a combination of multivariate analysis and expert-judgement. A number of bioassessment metrics was tested for both stream types (fast and slow running streams) to examine their power to discriminate between streams of different ecological quality within each stream type. A metric was selected for inclusion in the final multimetric index when there was no overlap of the 25th and 75th percentile between one (or more) ecological quality class(es). Out of all metrics tested, none could distinguish between all four ecological quality classes without overlap of the 25th and 75th percentile between one or more of the classes. Instead, metrics were selected that could distinguish between one (or more) ecological quality class(es) and all others. Finally, 10 metrics were selected for the assessment of slow running streams and 11 metrics for the assessment of fast running streams. Class boundaries were established, to make the assignment of scores to the individual metrics possible. The class boundaries were set at the 25th and/or 75th percentile of the individual metric values. The individual metrics were combined into a multimetric index. Calibration showed that 67% of the samples from slow running streams and 65% of the samples from fast running streams were classified in accordance to their post-classification. In total, only 8% of the samples differed more than one quality class from the post-classification. The multimetric index was validated with data collected in the Netherlands from 82 sites for the purpose of the AQEM project. Validation showed that 54% of the streams were classified correctly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AQEM consortium, 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the Water Framework Directive. Version 1.0, February 2002.
Bailey, R. C, M. G. Kennedy, M. Z. Dervish & R. M. Taylor, 1998. Biological assessment of freshwater ecosystems using a reference condition approach: comparing predicted and actual benthic invertebrate communities in Yukon streams. Freshwat. Biol. 39: 765–774.
Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, G. E. Griffith, R. Frydenborg, E. McCarron, J. S. White & M. L. Bastian, 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 185–211.
Blocksom, K. A., J. P. Kurtenbach, D. J. Klemm, F. A. Fulk & S. M. Cormier, 2000. Development and evaluation of the lake macroinvertebrate integrity index (LMII) for New Jersey lakes and resevoirs. Envir. Monit. Assess 77: 311–333.
Brabec, K., S. Zahr¨¢dkov¨¢, D. N¨§mejcov¨¢, R Pařil, J. Kokeš & J. Jarkovský, 2004. Assessment of organic pollution effect con- sidering differences between lotic and lentic stream habitats. Hydrobiologia 516: 331-346.
Buffagni, A., S. Erba, M. Cazzola & J. L. Kemp, 2004. The AQEM multimetric system for the southern Italian Apennines: assessing the impact of water quality and habitat degradation on pool macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia 516: 313–329.
Conquest, L. L., S. C. Ralph & R. J. Naiman, 1994. Implementation of Large-Scale Stream Monitoring Efforts: Sampling Design and
Data Analysis Issues. In Loeb, S. L. & A. Spacie (eds), Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, Florida.
DeShon, J. E, 1995. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND COUNCIL establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official J. Eur. Commun. L327: 1–72.
Fore, L. S., J. R. Karr & L. L. Conquest, 1994. Statistical Properties of an Index of Biological Integrity Used to Evaluate Water Resources. Can. J. Fish, aquat. Sci. 51: 1077–1087.
Fore, L. S., J. R. Karr & R. W. Wisseman, 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 15: 212-231.
Hawkes, H. A., 1979. Invertebrates as indicators of river water quality. In James, A. & L. Evison (eds), Biological Indicators of Water Quality. John Wiley, Chichester.
Hellawell, J. M., 1986. Biological indicators of Freshwater Pollution and Environmental Management. Elsevier Applied Science, London.
Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.
Intergovernmental Task Force on Monitoring Water Quality, 1993. The Multimetric Approach for describing ecological condition. EPA, Position Paper No. 2.
Karr, J. R., 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.
Karr, J. R., 1999. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwat. Biol. 41: 221-234.
Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Karr, J. R. & E. W. Chu, 2000. Sustaining living rivers. Hydrobio-logia 422/423: 1-14.
Kolkwitz, R. & M. Marsson, 1909. Ökologie der tierischen Saprobien. Beitrage zur Lehre von der biologischen Gewässerbeurteilung. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 2: 126–152.
Liebmann, H., 1951. The biological community of Sphaerotilus floes and the physio-chemical basis of their formation. Vom Wasser 20: 24.
Maxted, J. R., M. T. Barbour, J. Gerritsen, V. Poretti, N. Primrose, A. Silvia, D. Penrose & R. Renfrow, 2000. Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 19: 128–144.
Milner, A. M. & M. W. Oswood, 2000. Urbanization gradients in streams of Anchorage, Alaska: a comparison of multivariate and multimetric approaches to classification. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 209–223.
Moller Pillot, H. K. M., 1971. Faunistische beoordeling van de verontreiniging in laaglandbeken. Proefschrift, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 286 pp.
Ofenböck, T., O. Moog, J. Gerritsen & M. Barbour, 2004. A stressor specific multimetric approach for monitoring running waters in Austria using benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 516: 251–268.
Ohio Enviromental Protection Agency, 1987. Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life: Volume I-III. Ohio EPA, Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section, Columbus, Ohio.
Preston, F. W., 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: part 1. Ecology 43: 185-215.
Resh, V. H., D. M. Rosenberg & T. B. Reynoldson, 2000. Selection of benthic macroinvertebrate metrics for monitoring water quality of the Fraser River, British Columbia: implications for both multimetric approaches and multivariate models. In Wright, J. R, W. Sutcliffe & M. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria, U.K.
Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, K. E. Day & D. M. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 833–852.
Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), 1993. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, London, 461 pp.
Roth, N. E., M. T. Southerland, J. C. Chaillou, J. H. Volstad, S. B. Weisberg, H. T. Wilson, D. G. Heimbuch & J. C. Seibel, 1997. Maryland biological stream survey: ecological status of nontidal streams in six basins sampled in 1995. Report no. CBWP-MANTA-EA-97-2. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, Maryland.
Royer, T, V., C. T. Robinson & G. W. Minshall, 2001. Development of Macroinvertebrate-Based Index for Bioassessment of Idaho Rivers. Env. Manag. 27: 627–636.
Sandin, L., J. Dahl & R. K. Johnson, 2004. Assessing acid stress in Swedish boreal and alpine streams using benthic macroinverte- brates. Hydrobiologia 516: 129–148.
Sladecek, V., 1965. The future of the saprobity system. Hydrobiolo-gia 25: 518-537.
Sladecek, V., 1973. System of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch. f. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebnisse Limnol. 7: 1–218.
Sørensen, T., 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. 5: 1-34.
Stichting Toegepast Onderzoek Waterbeheer, 1992. Ecologische beoordeling en beheer van oppervlaktewater: Beoordelingssysteem voor stromende wateren op basis van macrofauna. STOWA, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 58 pp.
Wright, J. E, D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Bri-tain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.
Ter Braak, C. J. E, 1987. CANOCO -A FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended] [ca-nonical] correspondene analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1). TNO Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 95 pp.
Ter Braak, C. J. E ter & P. Šmilauer, 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User‘s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A., 352 pp.
Thome, R. J. & W. P. Williams, 1997. The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developing countries: a multimetric system of bioassessment. Freshwat. Biol. 37: 671-686.
Tolkamp, H. H. & J. J. P. Gardeniers, 1971. Hydrobiological survey of lowland streams. PhD Thesis, Standaard Boekhandel, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 286 pp.
Tuffery, G. & J. Verneaux, 1968. Methode de d¨¦termination de la qualit¨¦ biologique des eaux courantes. Exploitation codifi¨¦e des inventaires de fauna du fond. Minist¨¨re de 1‘Agriculture, France, 23 pp.
Van Tongeren, O., 1986. FLEXCLUS, an interactive flexible cluster program. Actabot.. Neerl. 35: 137-142.
Van Tongeren, O. (s.a.). Programma ASSOCIA: Gebruiker-shandleiding en voorwaarden.
Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1990. Ecological characterisation of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). PhD. dissertation, Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 255 pp.
Verdonschot, P. F. M. & R. C. Nijboer, 2000. Typology of macro- faunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In Wright, J. R, W. Sutcliffe & M. Furse (eds), Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria, U.K.
Weigel, B. M., 2003. Development of stream macroinvertebrate models that predict watershed and local stressors in Wisconsin. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 22: 123–142.
Woodiwiss, F. S., 1964. The biological system of stream classification used by the Trent River Board. Chem. Industry 11: 443-447.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vlek, H.E., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Nijboer, R.C. (2004). Towards a Multimetric Index for the Assessment of Dutch Streams Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates. In: Hering, D., Verdonschot, P.F.M., Moog, O., Sandin, L. (eds) Integrated Assessment of Running Waters in Europe. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 175. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0993-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3761-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0993-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive