Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution ((CIGE,volume 11))

Abstract

The two sibling cosmopolitan species, Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, are able to proliferate under very different climatic conditions. This has resulted in local adaptations, which are often arranged in latitudinal clines. Such clines are documented for body weight, wing and thorax length, sternopleural and abdominal bristle number, ovariole number and thoracic pigmentation. The overall magnitude of geographical differentiation is, however, much less in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster, and latitudinal clines are less pronounced.

The fact that natural populations live under different climates raises the problem of interaction between temperature and phenotype. The reaction norms of morphometrical traits have been investigated as a function of growth temperature. The shapes of the response curves vary according to the investigated trait. They are generally curvilinear and can be described by calculating characteristic values after polynomial adjustments. For a given trait, the reaction norms of the two species are similar in their shape, although some significant differences may be observed.

Within each species, significant differences are also observed between geographic populations: reaction norms are not parallel and the divergence is better marked when more distant populations (e.g., temperate and tropical) are compared. It thus appears that besides mean trait value, phenotypic plasticity is also a target of natural selection.

A specific analysis of wing shape variation according to growth temperature was also undertaken. Reaction norms with different shapes may be observed in various parts of the wing: the major effect is found between the basis and the tip of the wing, but in a similar way in the two species. By contrast, some ratios, called wing indices by taxonomists, may exhibit completely different reaction norms in the two species.

For a single developmental temperature (25°C) the phenotypic variability of morphometrical traits is generally similar in the two species, and also the genetic variability, estimated by the intraclass correlation. A difference exists, however, for the ovariole number which is less variable in D. simulans. Variance parameters may vary according to growth temperature, and a detailed analysis was made on wing dimensions. An increase of environmental variability at extreme, heat or cold temperatures, has been found in both species. Opposite trends were, however, observed for the genetic variability: a maximum heritability in D. simulans at middle temperatures, corresponding to a minimum heritability in D. melanogaster. Whether such a difference exists for other traits and in other populations deserves further investigations.

In conclusion, morphometrical analyses reveal a large amount of significant differences which may be related to speciation and to the divergence of ecological niches. Within each species, numerous geographic variations are also observed which, in most cases, reflect some kinds of climatic adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, D., 1994. Temperature and organism size-a biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 25: 1-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baba-Aïssa, F. & M. Solignac, 1984. La plupart des populations de Drosophila simulans ont probablement pour ancêtre une femelles unique dans un passé récent. CR Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. III 299: 289-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begun, DJ. & C.F. Aquadro, 1991. Molecular population genetics of the distal portion of the X chromosome in Drosophila: evidence for genetic hitchiking of the yellow-achaete region. Genetics 129: 1147-1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Y. & Y. Hochberg, 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57: 289-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubliy, O.A., V. Loeschke & A.G. Imasheva, 2000. Effect of stressful growth temperatures on variation of sternopleural bristle number in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 54: 1444-1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., J.R. David & A. Robertson, 1988. Thoracic trident pigmentation in natural populations of Drosophila simulans: a comparison with Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 61: 263-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., E. Pla & J.R. David, 1993. Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. I. Geographic variations. Genet. Select. Evol. 25:517-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capy, P., E. Pla & J.R. David, 1994. Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. II. Within-population variability. Genet. Select. Evol. 26: 15-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakir, R.M., A. Chafik, B. Moreteau, P. Gibert & J.R. David, 2002. Male sterility thermal thresholds in Drosophila: D. simulans appears more cold-adapted than its sibling D. melanogaster. Genetica 114: 195-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E.L., 1993. Life history invariants. Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, M., M.B. Coulthart & R.S. Singh, 1992. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Pattern and processes of genic divergence between D. melanogaster and its sibling, D. simulans. Genetics 13: 843-853.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J., 1970. Le nombre d’ovarioles chez Drosophilu: relation avec la fécondité et valeur adaptative. Arch. Zool. Exp. Genet. 111: 357-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R. & L. Tsacas, 1981. Cosmopolitan subcosmopolitan and widespread species: different strategies within the Drosophilid family (Diptera). CR Soc. Biogeogr. 51:11-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., P. Capy, V. Payant & S. Tsakas, 1985. Thoracic trident pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster: differentiation of geographical populations. Genet. Select. Evol. 17: 211-223.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., P. Capy & J.P. Gautier, 1990. Abdominal pigmentation and growth temperatures in Drosophila melanogaster. similarities and differences in the norms of reaction of successive segments. J. Evol. Biol. 3: 429-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R.,B. Moreteau, J.P. Gautier, G. Pétavy, J. Stockel & A.G. Imasheva, 1994. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale lines analysis. Genet. Select. Evol. 26: 229-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., P. Gibert, E. Gravot, G. Pétavy, J.P. Morin, D. Karan & B. Moreteau, 1997. Phenotypic plasticity and developmental temperature in Drosophila: analysis and significance of reaction norms of morphometrical traits. J. Therm. Biol. 22: 441-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J.R., R. Allemand, P. Capy, M. Chakir, P. Gibert, G. Pétavy & B. Moreteau, 2004. Comparative life histories and ecophysiology of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetica 120: 151-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpuech, J.M., B. Moreteau, J. Chiche, E. Pla, J. Vouidibio & J.R. David, 1995. Phenotypic plasticity and reaction norms in temperate and tropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster: ovarian size and developmental temperature. Evolution 49: 670-675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, J.A., 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C. Mackay, 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York, USA, 4th edn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Bellido, A. & J.F. de Celis, 1992. Developmental genetics of the venation pattern of Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 26: 277-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, P., B. Moreteau, J.C. Moreteau & J.R. David, 1996. Growth temperature and adult pigmentation in two Drosophila sibling species: an adaptive convergence of reaction norms in sympatric populations? Evolution 50: 2346-2353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, P., B. Moreteau, J.R. David & S.M. Scheiner, 1998. Describing the evolution of reaction norm shape: body pigmentation in Drosophila. Evolution 52: 1501-1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert, P., B. Moreteau & J.R. David, 2000. Developmental constraints on an adaptive plasticity: reaction norms of pigmentation in adult segments of Drosophila melanogaster. Evol Dev. 2: 249-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, A.R. & J.B. Falls, 1979. Thermal biology of the common gartner snake Thamnophis sirtalis (L.). II. The effects of melanism. Oecologia (Berlin) 43: 99-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulson, D., 1994. Determination of larval melanization in the moth, Mamestra brassicae, and the role of melanin in thermoregulation. Heredity 73: 471-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, L.R. & R.S. Singh, 1985. Mitochondrial DNA variation in natural populations of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics: 110: s42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imasheva, A.G.,B. Moreteau & J.R. David, 2000. Growth temperature and genetic variability of wing dimensions in Drosophila: opposite trends in two sibling species. Genet. Res. Camb. 76: 237-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan, D., J.P. Morin, P. Gibert, B. Moreteau, S. Scheiner & J.R. David, 2000. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. IX. Genetic architecture, temperature and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 54: 1035-1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver, J.G.& D.C. Wiernasz, 1991. Seasonal polyphenism in wing-melanin pattern and thermoregulatory adaptation in Pieris butterflies. Am. Nat. 137: 816-830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaise, D. & J.F. Silvain, 2004. How two Afrotropical endemics made two cosmopolitan human commensals: the Drosophila melanogaster-D. simulans palaeogeographic riddle. Genetica 120: 17-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaise, D., M.L. Cariou, J.R. David, F. Lemeunier, L. Tsacas & M. Ashburner, 1988. Historical biogeography of the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Evol. Biol. 22: 159-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemeunier, D., J.R. David, L. Tsacas & M. Ashburner, 1986. The melanogaster species group, pp. 148-239 in The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3B, edited by M. Ashburner, H.L. Carson, J.N. Thompson Jr. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, T.F.C., 1996. The genetic basis of quantitative variation: numbers of several bristles of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Trends Genet. 11: 464-470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreteau, B., J.P. Morin, P. Gibert, G. Pétavy, E. Pla & J.R. David, 1997. Evolutionary changes of non-linear reaction norms according to thermal adaptation: a comparison of two Drosophila species. CR Acad. Sci. 320: 833-841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreteau, B., A.G. Imasheva, J.P. Morin & J.R. David, 1998. Wing shape and developmental temperature in two Drosophila sibling species: different wing regions exhibit different norms of reaction. Russ. J. Genet. 34: 183-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreteau, B., P. Gibert, J.-M. Delpuech, G. Pétavy & J.R. David, 2003. Phenotypic plasticity of sternopleural bristle number in temperate and tropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. Camb. 81: 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.P, B. Moreteau, G. Pétavy, A.G. Imasheva & J.R. David, 1996. Body size and developmental temperature in Drosophila simulans: comparison of reaction norms with sympatric Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Select. Evol. 28: 415-436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, J.P., B. Moreteau, G. Pétavy & J.R. David, 1999. Divergence of reaction norms of size characters between tropical and temperate populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 329-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munjal, A.K., D. Karan, P. Gibert, B. Moreteau, R. Parkash & J.R. David, 1997. Thoracic trident pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster. latitudinal and altitudinal clines in Indian populations. Genet. Select. Evol. 29: 601-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, P.A., 1983. The Evolutionary Biology of Colonizing Species. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pétavy, G., J.P. Morin, B. Moreteau & J.R. David, 1997. Growth temperature and phenotypic plasticity in two Drosophila sibling species: probable adaptive changes in flight capacities. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 875-887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pétavy, G., B. Moreteau, P. Gibert, J.P. Morin & J.R. David, 2001. Phenotypic plasticity of body size in Drosophila: effects of a daily periodicity of growth temperature in two sibling species. Physiol. Entomol. 26: 351-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pétavy, G., B. Moreteau, P. Gibert & J.R. David, 2002. Phenotypic plasticity of body pigmentation in Drosophila: influence of a developmental thermoperiodic regime in two sibling species. Physiol. Entomol. 27: 124-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, D.A., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Theory and Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R.S., M. Choudhary & J.R. David, 1987. Contrasting patterns of geographic variation in the cosmopolitan sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Biochem. Genet. 25: 27-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S.C., 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A.H., 1919. A new species closely resembling Drosophila melanogaster. Psyche (Camb.) 26: 153-155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A.H., 1942. The classification of the genus Drosophila, with descriptions of nine new species. University of Texas Publication No. 4213 pp. 5-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, W.B., 1969. Adaptive significance of pigment polymorphisms in Colias butterflies. II. Thermorégulation and photoperiodically controlled melanin variation in Colias eurytheme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 63: 767-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, B.J., R.B. Azevedo, A.C. James, J. Van’t Land & L. Partridge, 2000. Cellular basis of wing size variation in Drosophila melanogaster: a comparison of latitudinal clines on two continents. Heredity 84: 338–347. rotoma (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae). Anim. Behav. 49: 1677-1687. énoptères. PhD Thesis, Lyon, 118 pp.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

P. Capy P. Gibert I. Boussy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibert, P. et al. (2004). Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity. In: Capy, P., Gibert, P., Boussy, I. (eds) Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans: So Similar, So Different. Contemporary Issues in Genetics and Evolution, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0965-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0965-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3755-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0965-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics