Skip to main content

Centralization and Decentralization: Changing Governance in Education

  • Chapter
Centralization and Decentralization

Part of the book series: CERC Studies in Comparative Education ((CERC,volume 13))

Abstract

Globalization and the evolution of a knowledge-based economy have caused dramatic changes to the character and functions of education in most countries around the world. However, the impacts of globalization on schools and universities are not uniform, though business-like practices have been adopted to cope with competition in the global marketplace. In the face of financial constraints and weakened state capacity in social policy provision, the pressure for restructuring and reforming education is increasingly driven by the growing expectations and demands of different stakeholders in society. In recent years, common concerns over widened access, funding, accountability, quality, and managerial efficiency have been perceived as prominent global trends related to education. Notwithstanding divergent political, social, economic, cultural and historical backgrounds, national and local governments may adopt similar or different strategies in response to pressures generated by globalization. One popular public policy strategy widely adopted by many states is decentralization, even though there is no consensus on whether a policy of centralization or decentralization is more effective to improve the organization and management of the public sector ([Dill & Sporn 1995]; [Fiske 1996]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ball, S.J. (1990). Politics and Policy Making in Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (2000). Performativity and Fragmentation in “Postmodern Schooling”. In J. Carter (ed.) Postmodernity and Fragmentation of Welfare. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. & Merrien, F-X. (1999). Governance of Universities and Modernization of the State: Analytical Aspects. In D. Braun & F-X Merrien (eds.) Towards a New Model of Governance for Universities? A Comparative View. London and Philadephia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (1999). Control of Education: Issues and Tensions in Centralization and Decentralization. In R.F. Amove, & C.A. Torres (eds.) Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, D. & McLaughlin, T.H. (eds.) (1994). Education and the Market Place. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, C. & White, L. (1982). Managing Development in the Third World. West Hartford: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1972). World Society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1972). World Society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P. (1996). Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamic of Political Globalization. Government and Opposition. 32 (2): 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Secretariat, The (1985). Training for Decentralized Systems of Government Administration.London: The Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1996). The Post-Modern State and the World Order. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curne, J. & Newson, J. (1998). Universities and Globalisation: Critical Perspectives. California: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1997). The State and the Governance of Education: An Analysis of the Restructuring of the State-Education Relationship. In A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown & A.S. Wells (eds.) Education: Culture, Economy and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. (1999). Specifying Globalization Effects on National Policy: A Focus on the Mechanisms. Journal of Education Policy. 14 (1): 1 –17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalization, New Managerialism, Academic Capitalism in Universities: Is the Local Dimension still Important? Comparative Education. 37 (1): 7 –20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D. & Sporn, B. (1995). The Implications of a Postindustrial Environment for the University: An Introduction. In D.D. Dill & B. Sporn (eds.) Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulks, K. (2000). Political Sociology: A Critical Introduction. New York: New York University

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E. et al. (1996). The New Public Management in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fesler, J.W. (1965). Approaches to the Understanding of Decentralization. Journal of Politics. 27 (4): 536–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E.B. (1996). Decentralization of Education: Politics and Consensus. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flvnn, N. (1997). Public Sector Management. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World. London: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E.M. (1998). Strategies of Educational Decentralization: Key Questions and Core Issues. Journal of Educational Administration. 36 (2): 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, E.M. (1999). National Centralization and Regional Decentralization in Spain: A Study of Educational Reform. Paper presented at the Workshop on Centralization versus Decentralization: Educational Reform in East and West, 20–21 October 1999, Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J.N. (2000). Centralization, Decentralization, Recentralization: Educational Reform in China. Journal of Educational Administration. 38 (5): 442–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition ofPostmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1991). Democracy, the Nation-State and the Global System. In D. Held (ed.) Political Theory Today. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. et al. (eds.) (1999). Global Transformations: Politics. Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E.J. (1994). The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914-1991. London: Michael Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggett, P. (1991). A New Management in the Public Sector? Policy and Politics. 19 (4): 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for all Seasons. Public Administration. 69: 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (1983). No Shortcuts to Progress: African Development Management in Perspective. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. & Barlett, W. (1993). Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmahon, A.W. (1961). Delegation and Autonomy. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddick, H. (1963). Democracy, Decentralization and Development. London: Asia Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2000). The Enterprise University. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, 29 November - 2 December 2000, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. & Rhodes, G. (2002). Beyond National States, Markets, and Systems of Higher Education: A Glonacal Agency Heuristic. Higher Education. 43: 281 –309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massen, P. & van Vught, F. (1994). Alternative Models of Governmental Steering in Higher Education: An Analysis of Steering Models and Policy-instruments in Five Countries. In L. Goedegebuure & F. van Vught (eds.) Comparative Policy Studies in Higher Education. Lemma: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, J. (1996). Globalization: Critical Reflections. Columbia: Lynne Reinner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. (1997a). Retreat of the State: Marketization of Education in the Pearl River Delta. Comparative Education Review. 41 (3): 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. (1997b). Privatization or Marketization: Educational Development in Post-Mao China. International Review of Education. 43 (5–6): 547–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. (2000). Reflecting Globalization Effects on Local Policy: Higher Education Reform in Taiwan. Journal of Education Policy. 15 (6): 637–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. & Currie, J. (2002). Reflections on the Impact of Globalization on Educational Restructuring in Hong Kong. In K.H. Mok & D. Chan (eds.) Globalization and Education: The Quest for Quality Education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.H. & Lee, M. (2000). Globalization or Recolonization: Higher Education Reforms in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy. 13 (4): 361 –377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1995). The Stirring of the Prince and the Silence of the Lambs: The Changing As- sumptions beneath Higher Education Policy Reform and Society. In D.D. David & B. Sporn (eds.) Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2001). The Changing Frontiers of Autonomy and Accountability. Higher Education Policy. 14(1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. & van Vught, F. (1994). Government and Higher Education in Developing Nations: A Conceptual Framework. In G. Neave & F. van Vught (eds) Government and Higher Education Relationships Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1995). Governance in Transition. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: A Plume Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (2000). Governance and Comparative Politics. In J. Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (ed.) (2000). Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1991). The Work of Nations: A Blueprint for the Future. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, R. & Dale, R. (2000). Comparative Contractual ism: A New Social Settlement in New Zealand Education. In D. Coulby, R. Cowen & C. Jones (eds.) World Yearbook of Education 2000: Education in Times of Transition. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. (1990). Decentralizing Urban Development Programs: A Framework for Analyzing Policy. Washington, D.C.: US Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. & Nellis, J.R. (1986). Assessing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: A Case for Cautious Optimism. Development Policy Review. 4(1): 3-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. (1980). The Study of Global Interdependence. New York: Nichols.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. (1992). Citizenship in a Cnanging Globl Order. In j.n. Rosenau & E. Czempiel (eds.) Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L.M. (ed.) (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (2000). Governance, the State, and the Market: What is Going on? Governance. 13: 243-250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (1995). The New World Order, Incorporated: The Rise of Business and the Decline of the Nation-State. Daedalus. 124: 80–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (1991). Sociology of the Global System. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklair, L. (1999). Globalization. In S. Taylor (ed.) Sociology: Issues and Debates. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.D. (1995). Nations and Nationalism in the Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.C. (1985). Decentralization: The Territorial Dimension of the State. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. (1994). The Politics of Decentralisation. Teaching Public Administration. 14 (2): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M.T. (1999). Education Reform and State Power in Mexico: The Paradoxes of Decentralization. Comparative Education Review. 43 (3): 251 –282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. & Hulme, D. (1997). Governance, Administration & Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. (1995). Globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, M. (2001). Globalization(Second Edition). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettenhall, R. (1996). Notes on the Language of Decentralization. Teaching Public Admini- stration. 16(1): 20 –35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (1997). Marketization, the State, and the Re-formation of the Teaching Profession. In A.H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown & A.S. Wells (eds.) Education: Culture, Economy & Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Mok Ka-Ho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mok, K.H. (2004). Centralization and Decentralization: Changing Governance in Education. In: Ka-Ho, M. (eds) Centralization and Decentralization. CERC Studies in Comparative Education, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0956-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0956-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3753-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0956-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics