Skip to main content

The Learning Cycle

  • Chapter
A Love of Discovery

Part of the book series: Innovations in Science Education and Technology ((ISET))

Abstract

Early approaches to science instruction in the United States consisted mainly of daily recitations from books and lectures. Use of the laboratory was unheard of prior to the mid 1800s. Physical materials and specimens, if used at all, were a means of verifying book or lecture information. But by the late 1800s, laboratory instruction became very popular because it was felt that firsthand observation and manipulation were useful in “disciplining” the mind. The idea of mental discipline stemmed from psychology and the then popular faculty theory. In general, faculty theory claimed that mental behavior was compartmentalized into several “faculties” such as logic, memorization, and observation. In theory, mental behavior could be enhanced by “exercising” these faculties and once the faculties were developed, they would function in all life situations. The theory was used to justify the use of abstract, meaningless, laborious tasks during instruction to exercise and strengthen the mind.

This material is based upon research partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. DUE 9453610. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989, Science For All Americans, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1990, The Liberal Art of Science, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkin, J.M. and Karplus, R., 1962, Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5): 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, 1992, Science & Technology: Investigating Human Dimensions, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collea, F.P., Fuller, R.G., Karplus, R., Paldy, L.G. and Renner, J.W., 1975, Physics Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Stony Brook: American Association of Physics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., 1916, Method in science teaching. General Science Quarterly, 1: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, T.W., 1910, Report of the committee on fundamentals of the Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 10: 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E.H., and Committee, 1898, Memorandum concerning report of committee of sixty. Addresses and Proceedings. Washington, DC, National Education Association, 37: 964–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G.H., and Roller, D.H.D., 1958, Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, P.D., 1961, Biological Education in American Secondary School, 1890–1960. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, W., and Kondo, A., 1968, SCIS Elementary Science Sourcebook. Berkeley, CA: Science Curriculum Improvement Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., 1974, The learning cycle. In The SCIS Teachers Handbook. Berkeley, CA: Regents of the University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., 1977, Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(2): 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Lawson, A.E., Wollman, W., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J.J., and Sullivan, E., 1977, Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning: A Workshop. Berkeley: Regents of the University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., and Thier, H.D., 1967, A New Look at Elementary School Science. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M., and Koenig, O., 1995, Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kral, E.A., 1997, Scientific reasoning in a high school English course. Skeptical Inquirer, 21(3): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E., 1995, Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R., and Renner, J.W., 1989, A Theory of Instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills. NARST Monograph Number One, Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C.A., 1958, Language, Thought, and the Human Mind. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, CA., 1967, Brain Mechanisms and Human Learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C.A., and Paulson, R.E. [Eds.], 1958, Laboratory and Field Studies in Biology: A Source Book for Secondary Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council, 1995, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation, 1996, Shaping the Future. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Curriculum Improvement Study, 1970, Environments: Teacher’s Guide. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science Curriculum Improvement Study, 1973, SCIS Omnibus. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, L.W., and Bybee, R.W., 1990, Becoming a Secondary Science Teacher. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education, 1998, Policy Brief: What the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Means for Systemic School Improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1958.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., & Peterson, Rita W. Intellectual development beyond elementary school II: Ratio, a survey. School Science and Mathematics, 1970, 70, 813–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Karplus, E. E, Formisano, M, & Paulsen, A. C. Proportional reasoning and control of variables in seven countries. Berkeley, Calif: Lawrence Hall of Science 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karplus, R., Lawson, A. E., Wollman, W. T., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J. J., & Sullivan, F. Workshop on science teaching and the development of reasoning. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science, 1977, Modules 2, 5 and 7. (Arrangements for the distribution of the workshop materials are being made.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., Blake, A. J. D., & Nordland, F. H. Training effects and generalization of the ability to control variables in high school biology students. Science Education, 1975, 59, 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., & Nordland, F. H. The factor structure of some Piagetian tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., & Wollman, W. T. Teaching proportions and intellectual development. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E., & Wollman, W. T. Encouraging the transition from concrete to formal cognitive functioning—An experiment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunzer, E. A. Formal reasoning: A re-appraisal. Proceedings 3rd Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society, Temple University, Philadelphia (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimark, E. D. Intellectual development during adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 1972, 15, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Science curriculum improvement study. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970–1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCIS teacher’s Handbook. Berkeley, Calif: Lawrence Hall of Science, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemacker, H. A. The Functional context of instruction. Professional paper 35–67, Human Research Office, George Washington University, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticht, T. G. Comments on Kenneth Lovell’s paper: Does learning recapitulate ontogeny? In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, and G. B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawson, A.E., Karplus, R. (2002). The Learning Cycle. In: Fuller, R.G. (eds) A Love of Discovery. Innovations in Science Education and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0876-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0876-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0876-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics