Abstract
Early approaches to science instruction in the United States consisted mainly of daily recitations from books and lectures. Use of the laboratory was unheard of prior to the mid 1800s. Physical materials and specimens, if used at all, were a means of verifying book or lecture information. But by the late 1800s, laboratory instruction became very popular because it was felt that firsthand observation and manipulation were useful in “disciplining” the mind. The idea of mental discipline stemmed from psychology and the then popular faculty theory. In general, faculty theory claimed that mental behavior was compartmentalized into several “faculties” such as logic, memorization, and observation. In theory, mental behavior could be enhanced by “exercising” these faculties and once the faculties were developed, they would function in all life situations. The theory was used to justify the use of abstract, meaningless, laborious tasks during instruction to exercise and strengthen the mind.
This material is based upon research partially supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. DUE 9453610. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989, Science For All Americans, Washington, DC.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1990, The Liberal Art of Science, Washington, DC
Atkin, J.M. and Karplus, R., 1962, Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5): 45.
Biological Sciences Curriculum Study, 1992, Science & Technology: Investigating Human Dimensions, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, p. 15.
Collea, F.P., Fuller, R.G., Karplus, R., Paldy, L.G. and Renner, J.W., 1975, Physics Teaching and the Development of Reasoning. Stony Brook: American Association of Physics Teachers.
Dewey, J., 1916, Method in science teaching. General Science Quarterly, 1: 3.
Galloway, T.W., 1910, Report of the committee on fundamentals of the Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 10: 801–813.
Hall, E.H., and Committee, 1898, Memorandum concerning report of committee of sixty. Addresses and Proceedings. Washington, DC, National Education Association, 37: 964–965.
Holton, G.H., and Roller, D.H.D., 1958, Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hurd, P.D., 1961, Biological Education in American Secondary School, 1890–1960. Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Jacobson, W., and Kondo, A., 1968, SCIS Elementary Science Sourcebook. Berkeley, CA: Science Curriculum Improvement Study.
Karplus, R., 1974, The learning cycle. In The SCIS Teachers Handbook. Berkeley, CA: Regents of the University of California.
Karplus, R., 1977, Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(2): 169–175.
Karplus, R., Lawson, A.E., Wollman, W., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J.J., and Sullivan, E., 1977, Science Teaching and the Development of Reasoning: A Workshop. Berkeley: Regents of the University of California.
Karplus, R., and Thier, H.D., 1967, A New Look at Elementary School Science. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kosslyn, S.M., and Koenig, O., 1995, Wet Mind: The New Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: The Free Press.
Kral, E.A., 1997, Scientific reasoning in a high school English course. Skeptical Inquirer, 21(3): 34–39.
Lawson, A.E., 1995, Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R., and Renner, J.W., 1989, A Theory of Instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills. NARST Monograph Number One, Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
Lawson, C.A., 1958, Language, Thought, and the Human Mind. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Lawson, CA., 1967, Brain Mechanisms and Human Learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Lawson, C.A., and Paulson, R.E. [Eds.], 1958, Laboratory and Field Studies in Biology: A Source Book for Secondary Schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
National Research Council, 1995, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation, 1996, Shaping the Future. Washington, DC.
Science Curriculum Improvement Study, 1970, Environments: Teacher’s Guide. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Science Curriculum Improvement Study, 1973, SCIS Omnibus. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science.
Trowbridge, L.W., and Bybee, R.W., 1990, Becoming a Secondary Science Teacher. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.
United States Department of Education, 1998, Policy Brief: What the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Means for Systemic School Improvement. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1958.
Karplus, R., & Peterson, Rita W. Intellectual development beyond elementary school II: Ratio, a survey. School Science and Mathematics, 1970, 70, 813–820.
Karplus, R., Karplus, E. E, Formisano, M, & Paulsen, A. C. Proportional reasoning and control of variables in seven countries. Berkeley, Calif: Lawrence Hall of Science 1975.
Karplus, R., Lawson, A. E., Wollman, W. T., Appel, M., Bernoff, R., Howe, A., Rusch, J. J., & Sullivan, F. Workshop on science teaching and the development of reasoning. Berkeley, Calif.: Lawrence Hall of Science, 1977, Modules 2, 5 and 7. (Arrangements for the distribution of the workshop materials are being made.)
Lawson, A. E., Blake, A. J. D., & Nordland, F. H. Training effects and generalization of the ability to control variables in high school biology students. Science Education, 1975, 59, 387–396.
Lawson, A. E., & Nordland, F. H. The factor structure of some Piagetian tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 461–466.
Lawson, A. E., & Wollman, W. T. Teaching proportions and intellectual development. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.
Lawson, A. E., & Wollman, W. T. Encouraging the transition from concrete to formal cognitive functioning—An experiment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 413–430.
Lunzer, E. A. Formal reasoning: A re-appraisal. Proceedings 3rd Annual Symposium of the Jean Piaget Society, Temple University, Philadelphia (in press).
Neimark, E. D. Intellectual development during adolescence. In F. D. Horowitz (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975.
Piaget, J. Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 1972, 15, 1–12.
Piaget, J. To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman, 1973.
Science curriculum improvement study. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970–1974.
SCIS teacher’s Handbook. Berkeley, Calif: Lawrence Hall of Science, 1974.
Shoemacker, H. A. The Functional context of instruction. Professional paper 35–67, Human Research Office, George Washington University, 1967.
Sticht, T. G. Comments on Kenneth Lovell’s paper: Does learning recapitulate ontogeny? In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, and G. B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lawson, A.E., Karplus, R. (2002). The Learning Cycle. In: Fuller, R.G. (eds) A Love of Discovery. Innovations in Science Education and Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0876-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0876-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-46687-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0876-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive