Abstract
The U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report [1] on the management and disposition of weapon-grade plutonium makes a number of valid observations and recommendations. Among the observations are that: (1) weapon plutonium presents a “clear and present danger” and (2) there is little advantage to annihilating weapon plutonium in view of the large amount of plutonium contained in spent fuel resulting from operation of today’s nuclear power plants. The latter observation led to a two-part recommendation that begins with conversion of weapon plutonium into a form that is similar to that of plutonium in spent fuel. NAS refers to this step as meeting the “spentfuel standard” and considers it to be a sufficient first step in disposition of excess weapon plutonium. The second part of the recommendation is that attention must subsequently be given to the proliferation risks associated with the much greater, and growing, amount of plutonium contained in the world’s nuclear spent fuel. This risk arises from the fact that technology for separating plutonium from spent fuel is well known and radiation barriers decay with time. We direct our attention here to the second step, but it also resolves the first step.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, National Academy of Sciences, Committee on International Security and Arms Control, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1994).
Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials-Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Volume I, Department of Energy, DOE/EIS-0229-D, Washington, DC, February 1996.
Summary Report of the Screening Process, Department of Energy, DOE/MD-0002, Washington, DC, March 29, 1995.
Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity, Chapter 1, edited by T. B. Johansson, et al, Island Press, Washington, DC (1993).
Electricity for the American Economy, Edison Electric Institute (1995).
Emissions of Greenhouse Gasses in the United States: 1987-1992, Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0573, Washington, DC, November 1994.
Borg, I. Y. and Briggs, C. K., U. S. Energy Flow-1993, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCID-19227-93, Livermore, CA, October 1994.
Nuclear Wastes-Technologies for Separations and Transmutation, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1996).
International Energy Outlook 1995, Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0484(95), Washington, DC (1995).
Uranium: 1993 Resources, Production, and Demand, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (1994).
Schwertz, N., et al, Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride: Waste or Resource?, published in Proceedings of the International Conference on Evaluation of Emerging Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems, Global 1995, Versailles, France, September 11-14, 1995.
World Nuclear Capacity and Fuel Cycle Requirements 1993, Department of Energy/Energy Information Administration, DOE/EIA-0436 (93), Washington, DC, November 1994.
The Environmental and Ethical Basis of Geological Disposal, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency (1995).
World List of Nuclear Power Plants, American Nuclear Society, Nuclear News, vol. 39 no. 3 pp. 29–44, March 1996.
Walter, C. E., A Strategy for an Advanced Nuclear-Electric Sector— Proliferation-Resistant, Environmentally Sound, Economical, published in Proceedings of the International Conference on Evaluation of Emerging Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems, Global 1995, Versailles, France, September 11-14, 1995.
Technical Summary Report for Surplus Weapons-Usable Plutonium Disposition, Department of Energy, DOE/MD-0003, Washington, DC, July 17, 1995.
Magee, P. et al, Performance Analysis of the 840 MWt PRISM Reference Burner Core, published in Proceedings of the 3rd JSME/ASME Joint International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (p. 819), Kyoto, Japan, April 23-27, 1995.
Boardman, C. E. et al., “Integrating ALWR and ALMR Fuel Cycles,” presented at the 4th ASME-JSME International Conference on Nuclear Engineering (ICONE-4), New Orleans, LA, March 10-14, 1996.
International Conference on Evaluation of Emerging Nuclear Fuel Cycle Systems, Global 1995, Versailles, France, September 11-14, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walter, C.E. (1997). The Utilitarian Approach To The Disposition Of Plutonium. In: Merz, E.R., Walter, C.E. (eds) Advanced Nuclear Systems Consuming Excess Plutonium. NATO ASI Series, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0860-0_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0860-0_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3743-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0860-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive