Skip to main content

Student Composition in a Private Studio Setting: Rethinking Assumptions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Narrative Soundings: An Anthology of Narrative Inquiry in Music Education

Abstract

This author reflected on the instructional methods used in her private piano studio as they related to her understanding of constructivist learning theory. Accepting the idea that student-constructed knowledge is more meaningful and memorable than teacher-dictated knowledge, she determined that certain benefits result from encouraging her students to write original compositions. The data informing this study included interviews with past students, journal entries about interactions with current students, and samples of student compositions. The process of composing original music often encourages substantive and instructive dialogue about music between teacher and student. As a result of the research, the author learned that the act of composition might also assist her students to develop creative minds, understand music theory, and discern important musical characteristics of various stylistic, cultural, and historical settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All student and parent names in this chapter are pseudonyms.

  2. 2.

    Permission was granted by all participants in this study.

  3. 3.

    Figure 1 shows the beginning of this composition.

  4. 4.

    Figure 2 shows the first page of Scott’s rough draft designed using his personal system. Figure 3 shows the beginning of the same composition converted to traditional notation for publication in our year-end composition booklet.

  5. 5.

    See Wiggins (2007, p. 454) for a more inclusive list of research supporting this subject.

  6. 6.

    Figures 4, 5, and 6 shows these three pieces.

  7. 7.

    See Fig. 7.

  8. 8.

    See Fig. 8.

References

  • Allsup, R.E. 2002. Crossing over: Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music ­education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M.S. 1999. Modal dissonance: An analysis of children’s invented notations of known songs, original songs, and instrumental compositions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 141: 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M.S. 2001. Constructing a view of children’s meaning-making as notators: A case-study of a five-year-old’s descriptions and explanations of invented notations. Research Studies in Music Education 16: 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M.S. 2003. Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education, ed. M. Hickey, 3–27. Reston: MENC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M.S. 2004/2005. Thinking about the representation of music: A case-study of invented notation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 161/162: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissex, G.L. 1992. Foreword. In Can I play you my song? ed. R. Upitis. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, L. 1998. Whole music: A whole language approach to teaching music. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, W.D. 2006. Why narrative? Why now? Research Studies in Music Education 27: 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brändström, S., and F. Högberg. 1998. Composing and teaching composition: The LuleÃ¥ concept. In Children composing, ed. B. Sundin, G. McPherson, and G. Folkestad, 82–96. Malmö: Musikhögskolan i Malmö.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresler, L. 2006. Embodied narrative inquiry: A methodology of connection. Research Studies in Music Education 27: 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briefel, J. 1997, July/August. Learning by writing music. Clavier, 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J.G., and M.G. Brooks. 1993. In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambourne, B. 1988. The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Auckland: Ashton Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chronister, R., S. Hekmat, and M. Baker. 1998, Summer. Music reading: How do you integrate composition and reading? Keyboard Companion, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D.J., and F.M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBenedetti, G. 1960. The creative pianist (primer): Better playing through composition. Dayton: The Heritage Music Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deturk, M. 1989. Critical and creative musical thinking. In Dimensions of musical thinking, ed. E. Boardman, 21–32. Reston: Music Educators National Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domer, J., and J.E. Gromko. 1996. Qualitative changes in preschoolers’ invented notations following music instruction. Contributions to Music Education 23: 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosnot, C.T. (ed.). 2005. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. 1993. Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. 1986. What’s whole in whole language? Portsmouth: Heineman Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, V. 1998, July. A chance to move? Music Teacher, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindea, C. 1972/1997. We make our own music. London: Kahn & Averill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, J.E. 1994. Children’s invented notations as measures of musical understanding. Psychology of Music 22: 136–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyke, J., and Y. Enoch. 1977/1987. Creative piano teaching. Champaign: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.A. 1995. Integrating elementary music instruction with a whole language first grade classroom (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International 57(04): 1535A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.A. 1997. Collaboration: The bonus prize in the research package. Teacher Research: The Journal of Classroom Inquiry 5(1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.A. 2002. Structuring learning in a different kind of classroom. In Dimensions of musical learning and teaching: A different kind of classroom, ed. E. Boardman, 69–104. Reston: MENC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B.A. 2004, June. Designing compositional tasks for elementary music classrooms. Research Studies in Music Education 22: 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M., and G.G. Wehlage. 1993. Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership 50(7): 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, J. 1997. The form of finality. British Journal of Music Education 14(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest, T. 2006. Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music 34(1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloboda, J.A. 1985. The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundin, B., G. McPherson, and G. Folkestad. 1998. Children composing. Malmö: Malmö Academy of Music and Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C.A. 1999. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. 1990. This too is music. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. 1992. Can I play you my song? The compositions and invented notations of children. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. 1990. Composition in the classroom: A tool for teaching. Reston: MENC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. 1992. The nature of children’s musical learning in the context of a music classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. 2001. Teaching for musical understanding. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. 2003. A frame for understanding children’s compositional processes. In Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education, ed. M. Hickey, 141–166. Reston: MENC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. 2007. Compositional process in music. In International handbook of research in arts education, ed. L. Bresler, 451–467. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, J. 1995, July/August. Introducing students to the world of composition. Clavier, 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Ann Miller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miller, B.A. (2012). Student Composition in a Private Studio Setting: Rethinking Assumptions. In: Barrett, M., Stauffer, S. (eds) Narrative Soundings: An Anthology of Narrative Inquiry in Music Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0699-6_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics