Abstract
This author reflected on the instructional methods used in her private piano studio as they related to her understanding of constructivist learning theory. Accepting the idea that student-constructed knowledge is more meaningful and memorable than teacher-dictated knowledge, she determined that certain benefits result from encouraging her students to write original compositions. The data informing this study included interviews with past students, journal entries about interactions with current students, and samples of student compositions. The process of composing original music often encourages substantive and instructive dialogue about music between teacher and student. As a result of the research, the author learned that the act of composition might also assist her students to develop creative minds, understand music theory, and discern important musical characteristics of various stylistic, cultural, and historical settings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Allsup, R.E. 2002. Crossing over: Mutual learning and democratic action in instrumental music Âeducation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Amabile, T.M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.
Barrett, M.S. 1999. Modal dissonance: An analysis of children’s invented notations of known songs, original songs, and instrumental compositions. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 141: 14–22.
Barrett, M.S. 2001. Constructing a view of children’s meaning-making as notators: A case-study of a five-year-old’s descriptions and explanations of invented notations. Research Studies in Music Education 16: 33–45.
Barrett, M.S. 2003. Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education, ed. M. Hickey, 3–27. Reston: MENC.
Barrett, M.S. 2004/2005. Thinking about the representation of music: A case-study of invented notation. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 161/162: 19–28.
Bissex, G.L. 1992. Foreword. In Can I play you my song? ed. R. Upitis. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Blackburn, L. 1998. Whole music: A whole language approach to teaching music. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Bowman, W.D. 2006. Why narrative? Why now? Research Studies in Music Education 27: 5–20.
Brändström, S., and F. Högberg. 1998. Composing and teaching composition: The Luleå concept. In Children composing, ed. B. Sundin, G. McPherson, and G. Folkestad, 82–96. Malmö: Musikhögskolan i Malmö.
Bresler, L. 2006. Embodied narrative inquiry: A methodology of connection. Research Studies in Music Education 27: 21–43.
Briefel, J. 1997, July/August. Learning by writing music. Clavier, 7–9.
Brooks, J.G., and M.G. Brooks. 1993. In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria: ASCD.
Bruner, J. 1996. The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
Cambourne, B. 1988. The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. Auckland: Ashton Scholastic.
Chronister, R., S. Hekmat, and M. Baker. 1998, Summer. Music reading: How do you integrate composition and reading? Keyboard Companion, 14–19.
Clandinin, D.J., and F.M. Connelly. 2000. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
DeBenedetti, G. 1960. The creative pianist (primer): Better playing through composition. Dayton: The Heritage Music Press.
Deturk, M. 1989. Critical and creative musical thinking. In Dimensions of musical thinking, ed. E. Boardman, 21–32. Reston: Music Educators National Conference.
Domer, J., and J.E. Gromko. 1996. Qualitative changes in preschoolers’ invented notations following music instruction. Contributions to Music Education 23: 62–78.
Fosnot, C.T. (ed.). 2005. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gardner, H. 1993. Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
Goodman, K. 1986. What’s whole in whole language? Portsmouth: Heineman Educational Books.
Griffiths, V. 1998, July. A chance to move? Music Teacher, 18–19.
Grindea, C. 1972/1997. We make our own music. London: Kahn & Averill.
Gromko, J.E. 1994. Children’s invented notations as measures of musical understanding. Psychology of Music 22: 136–147.
Lyke, J., and Y. Enoch. 1977/1987. Creative piano teaching. Champaign: Stipes.
Miller, B.A. 1995. Integrating elementary music instruction with a whole language first grade classroom (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International 57(04): 1535A.
Miller, B.A. 1997. Collaboration: The bonus prize in the research package. Teacher Research: The Journal of Classroom Inquiry 5(1): 57–74.
Miller, B.A. 2002. Structuring learning in a different kind of classroom. In Dimensions of musical learning and teaching: A different kind of classroom, ed. E. Boardman, 69–104. Reston: MENC.
Miller, B.A. 2004, June. Designing compositional tasks for elementary music classrooms. Research Studies in Music Education 22: 59–71.
Newmann, F.M., and G.G. Wehlage. 1993. Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership 50(7): 8–12.
Paynter, J. 1997. The form of finality. British Journal of Music Education 14(1): 5–21.
Priest, T. 2006. Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music 34(1): 47–61.
Sloboda, J.A. 1985. The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music. Oxford: Clarendon.
Sundin, B., G. McPherson, and G. Folkestad. 1998. Children composing. Malmö: Malmö Academy of Music and Lund University.
Tomlinson, C.A. 1999. The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria: ASCD.
Upitis, R. 1990. This too is music. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.
Upitis, R. 1992. Can I play you my song? The compositions and invented notations of children. Portsmouth: Heinemann Educational Books.
Wiggins, J. 1990. Composition in the classroom: A tool for teaching. Reston: MENC.
Wiggins, J. 1992. The nature of children’s musical learning in the context of a music classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wiggins, J. 2001. Teaching for musical understanding. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Wiggins, J. 2003. A frame for understanding children’s compositional processes. In Why and how to teach music composition: A new horizon for music education, ed. M. Hickey, 141–166. Reston: MENC.
Wiggins, J. 2007. Compositional process in music. In International handbook of research in arts education, ed. L. Bresler, 451–467. Amsterdam: Springer.
Winters, J. 1995, July/August. Introducing students to the world of composition. Clavier, 36–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, B.A. (2012). Student Composition in a Private Studio Setting: Rethinking Assumptions. In: Barrett, M., Stauffer, S. (eds) Narrative Soundings: An Anthology of Narrative Inquiry in Music Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0699-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0699-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0698-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0699-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)