Advertisement

Corporate Criminal Liability in Scotland: The Problems with a Piecemeal Approach

  • Findlay StarkEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 9)

Abstract

This chapter analyzes Scotland’s approach to corporate criminal liability. Through a patchwork of statute and case law, Scots law has struggled to define clearly the conditions under which a corporation – and/or its employees – may be held liable for crime. The chapter first critiques this approach to attribution, before moving on to consider four other issues: the offenses for which a corporation can be held liable in Scotland; the types of corporation which are capable of having criminal liability attributed to them; the range of sentences available to a court once a corporation has been convicted; and procedural concerns, such as the special evidential rules created in order to make the trial of a corporation possible. All of these matters remain, in certain aspects, unclear in Scots law and the paper concludes by making some tentative proposals for reform.

Keywords

Sexual Offence Criminal Liability Corporate Entity Corporate Liability Vicarious Liability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to James Chalmers, Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Edinburgh School of Law, for his valuable input to an earlier draft. I am also indebted to Radha Ivory and Shona Wilson for their helpful comments upon and criticisms of previous versions.

References

  1. Anwar, A. and G. Deeprose (2010), ‘The Bribery Act 2010’, Scots Law Times (News), 125.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, A. (2009), Principles of Criminal Law, 6th edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Batey, A. and A. Page (2002), ‘Scotland’s Other Parliament: Westminster Legislation About Devolved Matters in Scotland Since Devolution’, Public Law, 501.Google Scholar
  4. Burrows, N. (2002), ‘This is Scotland’s Parliament: Let Scotland’s Parliament Legislate’, Juridical Review, 213.Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers, J. (2004), ‘Corporate Culpable Homicide: Transco plc v. HM Advocate’, Edinburgh Law Review 8, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chalmers, J. (2006), ‘Just an Expert Group that Can’t Say No: Reforming Corporate Homicide Law’, Edinburgh Law Review 10, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, B. and H. Langsford (2005), ‘A Re-birth of Corporate Killing? Lessons from America in a New Law for Scotland’, International Company and Commercial Law Review 16, 28.Google Scholar
  8. Clive, E., P.R. Ferguson, C.H.W. Gane, and R.A.A. McCall Smith (2003), A Draft Criminal Code for Scotland with Commentary, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (2008), ‘Lord Advocate Announces Creation of Specialist Health and Safety Division’, <http://www.copfs.gov.uk/News/Releases/2008/10/02113235>.
  10. Cullen, W.D. (1990), The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster, vols. 1 & 2, Cm 1310, London.Google Scholar
  11. Dennis, I. (2009), ‘RIP: The Criminal Code (1968–2008)’, Criminal Law Review, 1.Google Scholar
  12. Dickson, B. (1992), ‘Northern Ireland’s Legal System – An Evaluation’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 43, 315.Google Scholar
  13. Drew, K. for UNICORN (2005), ‘Complying with the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention: Corporate Criminal Liability and Corruption: Exploring the Legal Options’, <http://www.againstcorruption.org>.
  14. Ferguson, P.W. (2006), ‘Trusts and Criminal Liability’, Scots Law Times (News), 175.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, P.W. (2007), ‘Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007’, Scots Law Times (News), 251.Google Scholar
  16. Fisse, B. and J. Braithwaite (1993), Corporations, Crime and Accountability, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Gane, C.H.W. (1992), Sexual Offences, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  18. Gane, C.H.W., C.N. Stoddart, and J. Chalmers (2009), A Casebook on Scottish Criminal Law, 4th edn, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  19. Glazebrook, P.R. (2002), ‘A Better Way of Convicting Businesses of Avoidable Deaths and Injuries?’, Cambridge Law Journal 61, 405.Google Scholar
  20. Gobert, J.J. (1994), ‘Corporate Criminality: Four Models of Fault’, Legal Studies 14, 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gobert, J.J. and M. Punch (2003), Rethinking Corporate Crime, London.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, G.H. (1984), The Criminal Law of Scotland: First Supplement to the Second Edition, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, G.H. (1986), ‘Commentary’, Scottish Criminal Case Reports, 676.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, G.H. (1991), ‘Commentary’, Scottish Criminal Case Reports, 16.Google Scholar
  25. Gordon, G.H. (2000), The Criminal Law of Scotland, vol. I, 3rd edn, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  26. Hirst, M. (2003), Jurisdiction and the Ambit of the Criminal Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Horder, J. (2007), ‘The Criminal Liability of Organisations for Manslaughter and Other Serious Offences’, in: S. Hetherington (ed.), Halsbury’s Laws of England: Centenary Essays, London, 103.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, T.H. (2004), ‘Splendid Isolation: Scottish Criminal Law, the Privy Council and the Supreme Court’, Criminal Law Review, 96.Google Scholar
  29. Law Commission of England and Wales (1996), Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary Manslaughter, Report No. 237, London.Google Scholar
  30. Mays, R. (2000), ‘The Criminal Liability of Corporations and Scots Law: Learning the Lessons of Anglo-American Jurisprudence’, Edinburgh Law Review 4, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McDiarmid, C. (1996), ‘Scots Law: The Turning of the Tide’, Juridical Review, 156.Google Scholar
  32. Norrie, A. (2001), Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
  33. Parliament (2005), Home Affairs and Work and Pensions Committee: First Joint Report of Session 2005–2006, HC (2005–2006), 540-I, London.Google Scholar
  34. Pieth, M. and R. Ivory (2011), ‘Emergence and Convergence – Corporate Criminal Liability Principles in Overview’, in this volume.Google Scholar
  35. Ross, J. (1990), ‘Corporate Liability for Crime’, Scots Law Times (News), 265.Google Scholar
  36. Ross, J. (1999), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: One Form or Many Forms?’, Juridical Review, 49.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, M. and J. Chalmers (2009), Walker and Walker: The Law of Evidence in Scotland, 3rd edn, Gateshead.Google Scholar
  38. Scottish Executive (2005), Corporate Homicide: Expert Group Report, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  39. Scottish Government (2009), ‘Criminal Appeal Statistics, Scotland: 2008–2009’, <http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/289648/0088697.pdf>.
  40. Scottish Law Commission (2006), Discussion Paper on the Nature and Constitution of Trusts, Scot Law Com DP No. 133, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  41. Stannard, J.E. (1984), Northern Ireland Supplement to Smith and Hogan, Criminal Law, 5th edn, Belfast.Google Scholar
  42. Stessens, G. (1994), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability: A Comparative Perspective’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly 43, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stewart, S.L. (1981), ‘The Case of the Shameless Company’, Journal of the Law Society of Scotland 26, 176 and 222 (article published over two issues).Google Scholar
  44. Wells, C. (2001), Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
  45. Wells, C. (2009), ‘Bribery: Corporate Liability Under the Draft 2009 Bill’, Criminal Law Review, 479.Google Scholar
  46. Wells, C. (2011), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability in England and Wales: Past, Present, and Future’, in this volume.Google Scholar
  47. Whyte, D. (1987), ‘Corporate Criminal Liability’, Scots Law Times (News), 348.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Edinburgh School of LawEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations