Abstract
Urban land-use pattern occurs not only at certain spatial scale but also at certain classification system. Study of spatial scale effect on urban land-use pattern analysis for the construction of spatial model of urban land-use changes entails the consideration of urban land-use classification system selected. Purpose of this research is to investigate the effect characteristics of spatial scale on the result of urban land-use pattern analysis for two different classification systems in terms of spatial autocorrelation and fuzzy mathematics by an empirical study in the CBD (Central Business District) of Tokyo so as to provide some useful information for the construction of multi-scale or hierarchical spatial model of urban dynamics. The Results show that while spatial autocorrelation of all the categories of urban land-use at different classification systems in this study is scale-dependent, characteristics of the spatial scale effect on pattern of urban land-use categories are different from classification systems. However, the general change trends of spatial autocorrelation of urban land-use for different classification systems show similar across a range of scale. Reducing number of urban land-use categories for one classification system may diminish the loss of information of land-use area across the range of scale and the effect of spatial scale on urban land-use pattern analysis in the certain extent.
This chapter is improved from “Yaolong Zhao and Yuji Murayama (2006), Effect of spatial scale on urban land-use pattern analysis in different classification systems: An empirical study in the CBD of Tokyo, Theory and Applications of GIS, 14, 29–42”, with permission from GIS Association, Japan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., & Witmer, R. E. (1976). A land-use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf
Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Barredo, J. I., Kasanko, M., McCormick, N., & Lavalle, C. (2003). Modeling dynamic spatial processes: Simulation of urban future scenarios through cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Plannning, 64, 145–160.
Batty, M. (1970). Modeling cities as dynamic systems. Nature, 231, 426–428.
Batty, M., & Xie, Y. (1994). From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B, 21, 31–48.
Benz, U. C., Hofmann, P., Willhauck, G., Lingenfelder, I., & Heynen, M. (2004). Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 58, 239–258.
Bibby, P., & Shepherd, J. (2000). GIS, land-use, and representation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 583–598.
Carlson, T. N., & Arthur, S. T. (2000). The impact of land-use - land cover changes due to urbanization on surface microclimate and hydrology: A satellite perspective. Global and Planetary Change, 25, 49–65.
Clarke, K. C., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24, 247–261.
Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial processes: Models and applications. London: Pion.
De Koning, G. H. J., Veldkamp, A., & Fresco, L. O. (1998). Land-use in Ecuador: A statistical analysis at different aggregation levels. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 70, 231–247.
Dickinson, G. C., & Shaw, M. A. (1977). What is land-use? Area, 9, 38–42.
Geographical Survey Institute (1998). Detailed digital information (10 m grid land-use) metropolitan area 1974, 1979, 1984, 1989 and 1994. Tokyo: Japan Map Center (in CD-ROM).
Goodchild, M. F. (1986). Spatial autocorrelation, Catmog 47. Norwich: GeoBook.
Gould, P. R. (1970). Is statistics inferens the geographical name for a wild goose? Economic Geography, 46, 439–448.
Hostetler, N. E., & McIntyre, M. E. (2001). Effects of urban land-use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2, 209–217.
Jantz, C. A., & Goetz, S. J. (2005). Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land-use-change model. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19, 217–241.
Klosterman, R. E. (2005). An update on planning support systems. Environment and Planning B, 32, 477–484.
Liu, Y., & Phinn, S. R. (2003). Modelling urban development with cellular automata incorporating fuzzy-set approaches. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27, 637–658.
Moody, A., & Woodcock, C. E. (1994). Scale dependent errors in the estimation of land cover proportions: Implications for global land cover data sets. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60, 585–594.
Moran, P. A. P. (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37, 17–23.
Nagendra, H., Munroe, D. K., & Southworth, J. (2004). From pattern to process: Landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land-use/land cover change. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 111–115.
Overmars, K. P., De Koning, G. H. J., & Veldkamp, A. (2003). Spatial autocorrelation in multi-scale land-use models. Ecological Modelling, 164, 257–270.
O’Sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. (2002). Geographic information analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Pauleit, S., Ennos, R., & Golding, Y. (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land-use and land cover change-a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 295–310.
Potoglou, D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2005). Carbon monoxide emissions from passenger vehicles: Predictive mapping with an application to Hamilton, Canada. Transportation Research Part D, 10, 97–109.
Qi, Y., & Wu, J. G. (1996). Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11, 39–49.
Silva, E. A., & Clarke, K. C. (2002). Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environmental and Urban Systems, 26, 525–552.
Solecki, W. D., & Oliveri, C. (2004). Downscaling climate change scenarios in an urban land-use change model. Journal of Environmental Management, 72, 105–115.
Stabler, L. B., Martin, C. A., & Brazel, A. J. (2005). Microclimates in a desert city were related to land-use and vegetation index. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 3, 137–147.
Straatman, B., White, R., & Engelen, G. (2004). Towards an automatic calibration procedure for constrained cellular automata. Computers, Environmental and Urban Systems, 28, 149–170.
Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.
Treitz, P., & Rogan, J. (2004). Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change: An introduction. Progress in Planning, 61, 349–363.
Turner, M. G. (1987). Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: A comparison of 3 transition models. Landscape Ecology, 1, 29–36.
Turner, M. G., O’Neill, R. V., Gardner, R. H., & Milne, B. T. (1989). Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 3, 153–162.
Veldkamp, A., Verburg, P. H., Kok, K., de Koning, G. H. J., Priess, J., & Bergsma, A. R. (2001). The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land-use change modeling. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 6, 111–121.
Verburg, P. H., de Koning, G. H. J., Kok, K., Veldkamp, A., & Bouma, J. (1999). A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling, 116, 45–61.
White, R., & Engelen, G. (1993). Cellular automata and fractal urban form: A cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 25, 1175–1199.
White, R., Engelen, G., & Uljee, I. (1997). The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modeling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B, 24, 323–343.
Wu, F. (1998). Simulating urban encroachment on rural land with fuzzy-logic-controlled cellular automata in a geographical information system. Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 293–308.
Yeh, A. G. O., & Xia, L. (2001). A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms by using GIS. Environment and Planning B, 28, 733–753.
Yin, Z., Walcott, S., Kaplan, B., Cao, J., Lin, W., Chen, M., et al. (2005). An analysis of the relationship between spatial pattern of water quality and urban development in Shanghai, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 197–221.
Zhang, J., & Foody, G. M. (1998). A fuzzy classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 2721–2738.
Zhang, J., & Stuart, N. (2001). Fuzzy methods for categorical mapping with image-based land cover data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, 175–195.
Zhao, Y., & Murayama, Y. (2005). Effect characteristics of spatial resolution on the analysis of urban land-use pattern: A case study of CBD in Tokyo using spatial autocorrelation index. In Y. Murayama & G. Du (Eds.), Cities in global perspective: Diversity and transition (pp. 585–594). Tokyo: IGU Urban Commission.
Acknowledgements
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40901090, 70863014; Foundation of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), No. 19.07003; Talents Introduced into Universities Foundation of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2009–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhao, Y., Murayama, Y. (2011). Effect of Spatial Scale on Urban Land-Use Pattern Analysis. In: Murayama, Y., Thapa, R. (eds) Spatial Analysis and Modeling in Geographical Transformation Process. GeoJournal Library, vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0670-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0671-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)