Skip to main content

Field-Based Fuzzy Spatial Reasoning Model for Constraint Satisfaction Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Analysis and Modeling in Geographical Transformation Process

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 100))

Abstract

Humans' representation about geographic phenomena in natural language is usually qualitative rather than quantitative. Qualitative spatial reasoning provides an approach which is considered to be closer to the representation. Commercial GIS software is being confronted with a challenge that the software should be equipped with artificial intelligent functions like qualitative spatial reasoning for users, especially for spatial decision-makers. This research proposes a framework of field-based fuzzy spatial reasoning through which qualitative description usually encountered in spatial reasoning process can be handled quantitatively. As preconditioning, field-based fuzzy representation structure for qualitative description is put forward, then the methods of constructing membership function are discussed. Standard operations of field-based fuzzy spatial reasoning model in the case of constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) are illustrated. An example explains the implication of the model in spatial decision-making process.

This chapter is improved from “Yaolong Zhao, Yumin Zhang, and Yuji Murayama (2005), Fieldbased fuzzy spatial reasoning model for geographical information systems: Case of constraint satisfaction problem, Theory and Applications of GIS, 13, 21–31”, with permission from GIS Association, Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloch, I., & Ralescu, A. (2003). Directional relative position between objects in image processing: A comparison between fuzzy approaches. Pattern Recognition, 36, 1563–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørke, J. T. (2004). Topological relations between fuzzy regions: Derivation of verbal terms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 141, 449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A. (1996). Natural objects with indeterminate boundaries. In P. A. Burough & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Geographical objects with indeterminate boundaries (pp. 3–28). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T., Molenaar, M., & Lin, H. (2001). Formulizing fuzzy objects from uncertain classification results. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claramunt, C., & Thériault, M. (2004). Fuzzy semantics for direction relations between composite regions. Information Science, 160, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clementini, E., Felice, P. D., & Hernández, D. (1997). Qualitative representation of positional information. Artificial Intelligent, 95, 357–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creignou, N., Khanna, S., & Sudan, M. (2001). Complexity classifications of Boolean constraint satisfaction problems. SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, 7, 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. U. (1991). Qualitative spatial reasoning about cardinal directions. Proceeding of the 7th Austrian conference on artificial intelligence, pp.157–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. U. (1996). Qualitative spatial reasoning: Cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 10, 269–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1992). Geographical data modeling. Computer and Geosciences, 18, 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guesgen, H. W., & Albrecht, J. (2000). Imprecise reasoning in geographic information systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 113, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, D. (1994). Qualitative representation of spatial knowledge. In Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 804). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, D., Clementini, E., & Felice, P. D. (1995). Qualitative distances. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 988, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, L., & Rousseuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladkin, P. B., & Maddux, R. (1994). On binary constraint problems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 41, 435–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurini, R., & Thompson, D. (1992). Fundamentals of spatial information systems. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2001). Geographic information systems and science. England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marriott, K., & Stuckey, P. (1998). Programming with constraints: An introduction. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyajima, K., & Ralescu, A. (1994). Spatial organization in 2D segmented images: Representation and recognition of primitive spatial relations. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 65, 225–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molennar, M., & Cheng, T. (2000). Fuzzy spatial objects and their dynamics. Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing, 55, 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullar, D. V., & Egenhofer, M. J. (1988). Towards the defection and use of topological relations among spatial objects. Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on spatial data handling, IGU, Colombus, OH, pp. 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renz, J. (2002). Qualitative spatial reasoning with topological information. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanakis, E., Vazirgiannis, M., & Sellis, T. (1999). Incorporation fuzzy set methodologies in DBMS repository for the application domain of GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13, 657–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1941). On the calculus of relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 6, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. X., & Stuart, N. (2001). Fuzzy methods for categorical mapping with image-based land cover data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15, 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. L., Zhao, J. S., & Wang, X. Z. (1999). Spatial membership function models of fuzzy geographical phenomenon and their application. Proceedings of the international symposium on spatial data quality, Hong Kong, pp. 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 40901090, 70863014; Foundation of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), No. 19.07003; Talents Introduced into Universities Foundation of Guangdong Province of China, No. 2009–26.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaolong Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Murayama, Y. (2011). Field-Based Fuzzy Spatial Reasoning Model for Constraint Satisfaction Problem. In: Murayama, Y., Thapa, R. (eds) Spatial Analysis and Modeling in Geographical Transformation Process. GeoJournal Library, vol 100. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0671-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics