Skip to main content

Weather Station Siting

Effects on Phenological Models

  • Chapter
Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science

Part of the book series: Tasks for Vegetation Science ((TAVS,volume 39))

Abstract

Temperature is the driving factor in most phenological models, and proper measurement is critical for both development and use of the models. In addition to selecting accurate sensors, they should be mounted at an appropriate height and properly shielded from short-wave radiation (double shielding is best). Choosing small sensors that respond rapidly, protecting electronic leads, and ventilation (in areas with little wind) can improve accuracy of the temperature measurements. Data should be collected at a height that is typical of other weather stations in the area where the model will be used. Generally, agricultural weather stations collect temperature data at 1.5 to 2.0 m height and weather services tend to measure at 10.0 m height. For phenological models of natural vegetation, it is best to site the weather station in a similar environment without irrigation. However, when the models are used for irrigated crops, the stations should be sited over an irrigated grass surface to avoid temperature fluctuations due to intermittent rainfall at the measurement site. Strong temperature gradients can occur near large water bodies (e.g., the ocean or large lakes) and in hilly or mountainous regions where sunlight is blocked during part of the day. In such regions, more weather stations are needed to better characterize microclimate differences. However, even when the temperature data are accurately determined, inaccuracies in model predictions can occur because it is plant temperature rather than air temperature that truly drives the phenological development. Although little or no literature on the topic exists, perhaps using vapor pressure deficits to estimate plant from air temperature could improve models and make them more universally applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  • Allen, J. C., A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days, Environ. Ent., 5, 388–396, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville, G. L., and P. Emin, Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures, Ecology, 50, 514–517, 1969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaraccio, C., D. Spano, P. Duce, and R. L. Snyder, An improved model for degree-days from temperature data, Int. J. Biometeorol., 45, 161–169, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Gaetano, A., and W. W. Knapp, Standardization of weekly growing degree day accumulations based on differences in temperature observation and method, Agric. For. Meteorol., 66, 1–19, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, G. C., Comparison testing of selected naturally ventilated solar radiation shields, Final Report Contract #NA-82-OA-A-266, NOAA, St. Louis, 15 pp., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmeyer, S., Building blocks — What goes on in a cubic meter of air?, Weatherwise, 54(5), 20–27, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso, S. B., R. D. Jackson, P. J. Pinter, R. J. Reginato, and J. L. Hatfield, Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability, Agric. Meteorol., 24, 45–55, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. D., S. B. Idso, R. J. Reginato, and P. J. Pinter, Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator, Water Resour. Res., 13, 651–656, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. E., and E. A. Fitzpatrick, A comparison of methods of estimating a mean diurnal temperature curve during the daylight hours, Arch. Meteorol. Geophys. Bioklimatol., Series B, 25, 251–263, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, D. E., J. F. Reid, and F. E. Woeste, Computer simulation of hourly dry-bulb temperatures, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 82-5, Virginia Politechnical Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 18 pp., 1982

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, K., Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica, J. Appl. Ecol., 31, 172–181, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith, J. L., and M. H. Unsworth, Principles of Environmental Physics, 2nd ed., Edward Arnold, London, 291 pp., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, W. J., and J. A. Logan, A model for diurnal variation in soil and air temperature, Agric. For. Meteorol., 23, 205–216, 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzaro, G., D. Spano, A. Canu, and C. Cesaraccio, Calcolo dei gradi—giorno per la previsione delle fasi fenologiche nell’actinidia, Italus Hortus, 5, 24–30, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky, L. J., J. M. Winkelman, J. M. Baker, J. M., and D. G. Baker, Accuracy of hourly air temperatures calculated from daily minima and maxima, Agric. For. Meteorol., 46, 193–209, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roltsch, J.W., F.G. Zalom, A.J. Strawn, J.F. Strand, and M.J. Pitcairn, Evaluation of several degree day estimation methods in California climates, Int. J. Biometeorol., 42, 169–176, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, T. J., Temperature, Academic Press, New York, 495 pp., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., Hand calculating degree-days, Agric. For. Meteorol., 35, 353–358, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., D. Spano, C. Cesaraccio, and P. Duce, Determining degree-day threshold from field observations, Int. J. Biometeorol., 42, 177–182, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. L., D. Spano, P. Duce, and C. Cesaraccio, Temperature data for phenological models, Int. J. Biometeorol., 45, 178–183, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wann, M., D. Yen, and H. J. Gold, Evaluation and calibration of three models for daily cycle of air temperature, Agric. For. Meteorol., 34, 121–128, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. T., and W. W. Barnett, Degree-days: an aid in crop and pest management, Calif. Agric., 37, 4–7, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X., M. J. Kropff, G. McLaren, and R. M. Visperas, A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature, Agric. For. Meteorol., 77, 1–16, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalom, F. G., P. B. Goodell, W. W. Wilson, and W. J. Bentley, Degree-Days: The calculation and the use of heat units in pest management, Leaflet 21373, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Davis, 10 pp., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Snyder, R.L., Spano, D., Duce, P. (2003). Weather Station Siting. In: Schwartz, M.D. (eds) Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Tasks for Vegetation Science, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0632-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0632-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1580-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0632-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics