Abstract
Nanotechnology is widely cited to be one of most exciting and important technologies for the twenty-first century. However, our knowledge of the effects nanomaterials have on human health and the environment is incomplete. The greatest potential for exposure over the next few years will be in the workplace, industry, and academic research institutions. This chapter presents the current scientific findings and understandings of the dangers nanotechnology imposes on the environment, human health, and safety with a special emphasis on current regulatory framework within the European Union (EU). This chapter analyses the overall development of this novel field by the study of two basic indicators, publications and patent applications in regard to environment, health and safety in ten South Eastern European countries. Publication data collected in worldwide databases such as those of the ISI/WOS are used to track the dynamics of science and technology development, whereas patent applications to EPO/WIPO are used to trace industry development of this novel field in South Eastern Europe (SEE). The increasing speed of nanotechnology development and commercialization has apparently run ahead of health, environmental and safety data. It is imperative for the SEE governments to develop a flexible form of the so-called adaptive management that will allow appropriate control and regulation of nanomaterials for the interim period until definitive health and safety data are obtained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balbus JM, Maynard AD, Colvin VL, Castranova V, Daston GP, Denison RA (2007) Meeting report: hazard assessment for nanoparticles: report from an interdisciplinary workshop. Environ Health Perspect 115(11):1654–1659
Boxall ABA, Chaudhry Q, Sinclair C, Jones AD, Aitken R, Jefferson B et al (2008) Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. Report by the Central Science Laboratory for Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). DEFRA, Sand Hutton
CEC (2008a) Communication from the commission to the European parliament, The Council and the European Economic and Social Committee Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials [SEC (2008) 2036] COM (2008) 366 final. Brussels, 17.6.2008. Resource document. Commission of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/comm_2008_0366_en.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2010
CEC (2008b) Commission recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. Brussels, 07/02/2008 COM (2008) 424 final. Resource document. Commission of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2010
Chaundry Q, Blackburn J, Floyd P, George C, Nwaogu T, Boxall A et al (2006) A scoping study to identify gaps in environmental regulation for the products and applications of nanotechnologies. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London. Resource document. DEFRA. http://www.defra.gov.uk/science/Project_Data/DocumentLibrary/CB01075/CB01075_3373_FRP.doc. Accessed 13 Apr 2010
Choi OK, Deng K, Kim NJ, Ross L, Surampalli YR, Hu ZQ (2008) The inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles, silver ions, and silver chloride colloids on microbial growth. Water Res 42:3066–3074
Colvin VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21(10):1166–1170
Davies JC (2008) Nanotechnology oversight: an agenda for the new administration. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Washington, DC. Resource document Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. http://207.58.186.238/process/assets/files/6709/pen13.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2010
Dekkers S, Prud’homme De Lodder LCH, de Winter R, Sips AJAM, de Jong WH (2007) Inventory of consumer products containing nanomaterials RIVM/SIR Advisory report 11124 Version July 27. Resource document. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/digitaaldepot/inventoryconsumerproducts.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2010
Environmental Defence and DuPont (2007) Nano risk framework. Environmental Defense and DuPont. Nano Partnership, June 2007. Resource document. http://www.edf.org/documents/6496_Nano%20Risk%20Framework.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2010
EP and CEU (2006) Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 99/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 793/93 and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. (L 396). Resource document. European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=oj:l:2006:396:0001:0849:en:pdf. Accessed 27 May 2010
EPA (2007) Nanotechnology white paper. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Resource document. EPA. http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/nanotech/epa-nanotechnology-whitepaper-0207.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2010
EPA (2008) Nanomaterial research strategy. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Resource document. EPA. http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/nanotech_research_strategy_final.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2010
European Commission (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. Resource document. European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2000:0001:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 27 May 2010
European Commission (2003) Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. European Chemical Bureau, Italy. Resource document. European Commission. http://ecb.jrc.it/Documents/TECHNICAL_GUIDANCE_DOCUMENT/EDITION_2/tgdpart1_2ed.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2010
European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee: Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials. Brussels, 17.6.2008 COM(2008) 366 final. Resource document. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/comm_2008_0366_en.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2010
European Consumers’ Organization (BEUC) (2009) ANEC/BEUC inventory of products claiming to contain nanoparticles available on the EU market. Resource document. BEUC. http://www.beuc.eu/objects/2/files/ANEC_BEUC_nano_inventory.xls. Accessed 27 May 2010
FramingNano (2009) FramingNano mapping study on regulation and governance of nanotechnologies. FramingNano Project Consortium (January 2009). Resource document. FramingNano. http://www.framingnano.eu. Accessed 7 June 2010
Frater L, Stokes E, Lee R, Oriola T (2006) An overview of the framework of current regulation affecting the development and marketing of nanomaterials. A report for the Department for Trade and Industry (DTI) by Cardiff University. Resource document. DTI. http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file36167.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
Grieger KD, Baun A, Owen R (2010) Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 12:383–392
Hansen SF (2009) Regulation and risk assessment of nanomaterials: too little, too late? Doctoral thesis. Technical University of Denmark. Resource document. http://www2.er.dtu.dk/publications/fulltext/2009/ENV2009-069.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2010
Hansen SF (2010) A global view of regulations affecting nanomaterials. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. doi:10.1002/wnan.99
Hansen SF, Tickner JA (2007) The challenges of adopting voluntary health, safety and environment measures for manufactured nanomaterials: lessons learned from the past for more effective adoption in the future. Nanotechnol Law Bus 4(3):341–359
Hansen SF, Michelson E, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer-Lauridsen F, Baun A (2008) Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products. Ecotoxicology 17(5):438–447
Heinze T (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: analysis of publications and patent applications including comparisons with the United States. Nanotechnol Law Bus 1:427–445
Igami M, Okazaki T (2007) Capturing Nanotechnology’s current state of development via analysis of patents. STI Working Paper 2007/4, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. Resource document. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/9/38780655.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2007) Policy brief: nanotechnology risk governance. Recommendations for a global, coordinated approach to the governance of potential risks. CH-1219 Geneva, Switzerland. Resource document. IRGC. www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/PB_nanoFINAL2_2_pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) (2009) Policy brief – appropriate risk governance strategies for nanotechnology applications in food and cosmetics. CH-1219 Geneva, Switzerland. Resource document. IRGC. http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_PBnanofood_WEB.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
ISO (2008) ISO/TS 27687:2008. Nanotechnologies – terminology and definitions for nano- objects – nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate. Resource document. ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=44278. Accessed 20 June 2010
ISO (2010) ISO/TS 229 Nanotechnologies. Resource document. ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_tc_browse.htm?commid=381983. Accessed 20 June 2010
Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A, Zuleeg S et al (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233–239
Lam CW, James JT, McCluskey R, Hunter RL (2004) Pulmonary toxicity of single- wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation. J Toxicol Sci 77:126–134
Lee R, Stokes E (2009) Twenty-first century novel: regulating nanotechnologies. J Environ Law 21(3):469–482. doi:10.1093/jel/eqp028
Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus RC (2007) Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanoparticles Res 9:543–554
Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Monica JC, Hansen SF, Davis TA (2009a) Nano risk governance: current developments and future perspectives. Nanotechnol Law Bus 6:203–220
Linkov I, Steevens J, Adlakha-Hutcheon G, Bennett E, Chappell M, Colvin V et al (2009b) Emerging methods and tools for environmental risk assessment, decision-making, and policy for nanomaterials: summary of NATO advanced research workshop. J Nanoparticles Res 11:513–527
Luoma SN (2008) Silver nanotechnologies and the environment: old problems or new challenges? PEN 15. Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars and PEW Charitable Trusts. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars and PEW Charitable Trusts, Washington, DC
Lux Research (2007) Small stuff in search of the big bucks: nanotechnology commercialization activities by sector. Presentation to IEEE San Francisco Bay Area Nanotechnology Council on Dec. 18, 2007. Resource document. IEEE. http://ewh.ieee.org/r6/san_francisco/nntc/events/IEEE_talk_121807_Nanotech_Commercialization_Kristin_Abkemeier_Lux_Research.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2010
Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G et al (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature 444:267–269
Mueller NC, Nowack B (2008) Exposure modelling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447–4453
NIOSH (2005) Current intelligence bulletin: evaluation of health hazard and recommendations for occupational exposure to titanium dioxide. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health DRAFT. Resource document. NIOSH. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/review/public/tio2/pdfs/tio2draft.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2010
NIOSH (2007) Progress toward safe nanotechnology in the workplace: a report from NIOSH Nanotechnology Research Centre. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Resource document. NIOSH. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-123/. Accessed 26 Jan 2010
Noyons ECM, Buter RK, van Raan AFJ, Schmoch U, HeinzeT, Hinze S (2003) Mapping excellence in science and technology across europe nanoscience and nanotechnology, Part 2: Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Draft report of project EC-PPN CT-2002-0001 to the European Commission. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Centre for Science and Technology Studies/Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhöffer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research. Resource document. European Commission. http://studies.cwts.nl/projects/ec-coe/cgi-bin/izite.pl?show=publications. Accessed 27 May 2010
Oberdörster E (2004) Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environ Health Perspect 112(10):1058–1062
Oberdörster G, Stone V, Donaldson K (2007) Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical perspective. Nanotoxicology 1:2–25
OECD (2009) Safety of manufactured nanomaterials. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Resource document. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/department/0,3355,en_2649_37015404_1_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 27 May 2010
OECD (2010) OECD programme on the safety of manufactured nanomaterials 2009–2012: operational plans of the projects. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Resource document. OECD. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2010doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT000029AE/$FILE/JT03282410.PDF. Accessed 27 May 2010
Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WA, Seaton A, Stone V et al (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 3(7):423–428
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies (PEN) (2010) A nanotechnology consumer product inventory. Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. Washington, DC. Resource document. PEN. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed 20 June 2010
RCEP (2008) Novel materials in the environment: the case of nanotechnology. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, November 2008. Resource document. RCEP. http://www.officialdocuments.gov.uk/document/cm74/7468/7468.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010
REACH (2008) Follow-up to the 6th Meeting of the REACH Competent Authorities for the Implementation of Regulation (EC) 1907/2006. Resource document. REACH. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/pdf/nanomaterials.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010
RS and RAE (Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering) (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. The Royal Society, London. Resource document. The Royal Society. http://www.nanotec.org.uk/report/Nano%20report%202004%20fin.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010
SCENIHR (2006) The appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. Resource document. SCENIHR. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
SCENIHR (2007) The appropriateness of the risk assessment methodology in accordance with the technical guidance documents for new and existing substances for assessing the risks of nanomaterials. European Commission, Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, June 21–22. Resource document. SCENIHR. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_010.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
SCENIHR (2009) Risk assessment of products of nanotechnologies. European Commission: Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks, January 19. Resource document. SCENIHR. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_023.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2010
Ševkušić M, Uskoković DP (2009) Analiza aktivnosti u oblasti nanonauka i nanotehnologija u Srbiji na osnovu bibliometrijskih pokazatelja (Eng. State of the art in nanoscience and nanotechnology in serbia: a preliminary bibliometric analysis). Tehnika – Novi materijali 18(5):1–16
Stone V, Hankin S, Aitken R, Aschberger K, Baun A, Christensen F et al (2010) Engineered nanoparticles: review of health and environmental safety (ENRHES) 2010. Resource document. ENRHES. http://nmi.jrc.ec.europa.eu/project/ENRHES.htm. Accessed 20 June 2010
Widmer M, Meili C, Mantovani E, Porcari A (2010) The FramingNano Governance platform: a new integrated approach to the responsible development of nanotechnologies, February 2010. Resource document. FramingNano. http://www.innovationsgesellschaft.ch/media/archive2/publikationen/FramingNano_Executive_Summary_Final.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2010
Zhang W (2003) Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. J Nanoparticles Res 5:323–332
Acknowledgments
The author is grateful to Professor Edward W. Randall from The School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London for editorial comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dimitrijević, D. (2011). Nanotechnology: The Need for the Implementation of the Precautionary Approach beyond the EU. In: Meško, G., Dimitrijević, D., Fields, C. (eds) Understanding and Managing Threats to the Environment in South Eastern Europe. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0611-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0611-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0610-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0611-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)