Skip to main content

Abstract

The purpose of this book is to explore, in a broad perspective, how corruption affects economic growth and environmental protection. Other aspects of development, such as education and inequality in entitlements to natural resources, will also be considered within the context of the main objectives. The introductory chapter provides an overview of economic approaches to corruption, of the relationship of corruption with environmental policies, the research questions and the book’s outline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From Deuteronomy (5:14–21) we know that the King received his powers from God with the purpose of serving the Israeli Nation, and was himself subject to the law: [the King may] “not consider himself better than his brothers and turn from the law to the right or to the left” (Deuteronomy 5:20). It is apparent that a distinction between the public and the private sphere of rulers was already present in the Old Testament and that the use of power by the ruler was subject to restraints. Therefore, we can interpret this story as a case of corruption; see the discussion below on the definition of corruption.

  2. 2.

    See the definition given at http://www.transparency.org/news_room/faq/corruption_faq, 3 November 2009.

  3. 3.

    Public rent seeking also includes activities that are not corruption strictu sensu, for example lobbying (Murphy et al. 1993).

  4. 4.

    For a discussion of corruption in light of the rent-seeking literature, see Lambsdorff (2002).

  5. 5.

    Bhagwati (1982) highlighted how diversion of resources from productive activities reduces social welfare, but also that in already distorted economies such activities might have an ambiguous effect. Some of the arguments put forward to substantiate the benefits of corruption (i.e. that in economies where corruption is common additional corruption can be beneficial) can be linked to this line of reasoning.

  6. 6.

    For supporting experimental evidence on intrinsic motivations (moral costs) and corruption, see Schulze and Frank (2003).

  7. 7.

    The point was made by several authors, e.g. Alam (1989); Lambsdorff (2002).

  8. 8.

    For an example applied to forestry , see Robbins (2000, p. 435), for a general discussion, see Bardhan (1997, p. 1322).

  9. 9.

    Some authors are also putting forward an institutional economics perspective on corruption that is based on the “traditional” institutionalist approach (see, Hodgson and Jiang 2007).

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90(1), 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M. S. (1989). Anatomy of corruption: An approach to the political economy of underdevelopment. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(4), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, G. G. (2004). Fiscal decentralization: A remedy for corruption? International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A.-V. (1997). A theory of misgovernance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1289–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N. (1982). Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. The Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 988–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damania, R. (2002). Environmental controls with corrupt bureaucrats. Environment and Development Economics, 7, 407–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., & List, J. A. (2003). Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 490–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and environmental policy: Theory and evidence from the United States. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, N. (1997). A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3, 4), 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic-growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., de Mello, L., & Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 749–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M., & Jiang, S. X. (2007). The economics of corruption and the corruption of economics: An institutionalist perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1043–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O. (1974). Political economy of rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., et al. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 15(1), 222–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J.-G. (2002). Corruption and rent-seeking. Public Choice, 113(1, 2), 97–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, C., & Weidmann, J. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. IMF working paper. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.-M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.-W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?. American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. (2005). Bad medicine: The war on corruption is leaving the world worse than it found it. Foreign Policy, (147), 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, L. (2011). Forest management and poverty in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua: Reform failures? European Journal of Development Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P. (2000). The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography, 19(4), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, E. V. (1970). On the theory of corruption. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 19(1), 86–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, G.-G., & Frank, B. (2003). Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Economics of Governance, 4(2), 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. (2007). World investment report 2007: Transnational corporations, extractive industries and development. United Nations conference on trade and development. New York, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1999). New concepts for old? Third World Quarterly, 20(3), 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Pellegrini .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pellegrini, L. (2011). Introduction. In: Corruption, Development and the Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0599-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics