Abstract
The purpose of this book is to explore, in a broad perspective, how corruption affects economic growth and environmental protection. Other aspects of development, such as education and inequality in entitlements to natural resources, will also be considered within the context of the main objectives. The introductory chapter provides an overview of economic approaches to corruption, of the relationship of corruption with environmental policies, the research questions and the book’s outline.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From Deuteronomy (5:14–21) we know that the King received his powers from God with the purpose of serving the Israeli Nation, and was himself subject to the law: [the King may] “not consider himself better than his brothers and turn from the law to the right or to the left” (Deuteronomy 5:20). It is apparent that a distinction between the public and the private sphere of rulers was already present in the Old Testament and that the use of power by the ruler was subject to restraints. Therefore, we can interpret this story as a case of corruption; see the discussion below on the definition of corruption.
- 2.
See the definition given at http://www.transparency.org/news_room/faq/corruption_faq, 3 November 2009.
- 3.
Public rent seeking also includes activities that are not corruption strictu sensu, for example lobbying (Murphy et al. 1993).
- 4.
For a discussion of corruption in light of the rent-seeking literature, see Lambsdorff (2002).
- 5.
Bhagwati (1982) highlighted how diversion of resources from productive activities reduces social welfare, but also that in already distorted economies such activities might have an ambiguous effect. Some of the arguments put forward to substantiate the benefits of corruption (i.e. that in economies where corruption is common additional corruption can be beneficial) can be linked to this line of reasoning.
- 6.
For supporting experimental evidence on intrinsic motivations (moral costs) and corruption, see Schulze and Frank (2003).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
Some authors are also putting forward an institutional economics perspective on corruption that is based on the “traditional” institutionalist approach (see, Hodgson and Jiang 2007).
References
Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (2000). The choice between market failures and corruption. American Economic Review, 90(1), 194–211.
Alam, M. S. (1989). Anatomy of corruption: An approach to the political economy of underdevelopment. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(4), 441–456.
Arikan, G. G. (2004). Fiscal decentralization: A remedy for corruption? International Tax and Public Finance, 11(2), 175–195.
Banerjee, A.-V. (1997). A theory of misgovernance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1289–1332.
Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.
Bhagwati, J. N. (1982). Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. The Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 988–1002.
Chowdhury, S. K. (2004). The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: An empirical test. Economics Letters, 85(1), 93–101.
Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81.
Damania, R. (2002). Environmental controls with corrupt bureaucrats. Environment and Development Economics, 7, 407–427.
Damania, R., Fredriksson, P. G., & List, J. A. (2003). Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 490–512.
Fredriksson, P. G., & Millimet, D. L. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and environmental policy: Theory and evidence from the United States. Unpublished manuscript.
Groenendijk, N. (1997). A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27(3, 4), 207–229.
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic-growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
Gupta, S., de Mello, L., & Sharan, R. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 749–777.
Hodgson, G. M., & Jiang, S. X. (2007). The economics of corruption and the corruption of economics: An institutionalist perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(4), 1043–1061.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Krueger, A. O. (1974). Political economy of rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., et al. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 15(1), 222–279.
Lambsdorff, J.-G. (2002). Corruption and rent-seeking. Public Choice, 113(1, 2), 97–125.
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2007). The institutional economics of corruption and reform: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leite, C., & Weidmann, J. (1999). Does mother nature corrupt? Natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. IMF working paper. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93(4), 760–781.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279.
Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.
Murphy, K.-M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.-W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth?. American Economic Review, 83(2), 409–414.
Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Naim, M. (2005). Bad medicine: The war on corruption is leaving the world worse than it found it. Foreign Policy, (147), 96–98.
Pellegrini, L. (2011). Forest management and poverty in Bolivia, Honduras and Nicaragua: Reform failures? European Journal of Development Research.
Robbins, P. (2000). The rotten institution: Corruption in natural resource management. Political Geography, 19(4), 423–443.
Roy, E. V. (1970). On the theory of corruption. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 19(1), 86–110.
Schulze, G.-G., & Frank, B. (2003). Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Economics of Governance, 4(2), 143–160.
Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457.
UNCTAD. (2007). World investment report 2007: Transnational corporations, extractive industries and development. United Nations conference on trade and development. New York, Geneva.
Williams, R. (1999). New concepts for old? Third World Quarterly, 20(3), 503–513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pellegrini, L. (2011). Introduction. In: Corruption, Development and the Environment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0599-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0599-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0598-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0599-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)