Skip to main content

Managing Wetlands for Multifunctional Benefits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wetlands

Abstract

Humans have sought to manage and exploit wetlands from the beginning of recorded history. From the early modifications of the marshlands of Mesopotamia to the draining of the English Fens, the management of wetlands has always reflected the major societal and economic drivers of the times. Early efforts at conservation management focussed primarily on waterbirds, but over the latter part of the twentieth Century there has been a shift of emphasis towards towards ‘wise use’ and an understanding of how ecosystem processes and functions deliver important benefits to human society. The recognition that the natural environment provides societal benefits is crucial to the future conservation of wetlands. Building on the Ecosystem Approach, the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of wetlands, which extends beyond biological and hydrological regimes into social and economic science, is considered essential if improved decision-making is to be achieved in order to deliver multifuncitonal benefits from wetland management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acreman MC, Fisher J, Stratford CJ, Mould DJ, Mountford JO (2007) Hydrological science and wetland restoration: some case studies from Europe. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:158–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Algaze G (2008) Ancient Mesopotamia at the dawn of civilization: the evolution of an urban landscape. Chicago University Press, Chicago, p 246

    Google Scholar 

  • Apitz SE, Elliot M, Fountain M, Galloway TS (2006) European environmental management: moving to an ecosystem approach. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland E (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54:253–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benstead P (2000) Practical wetland restoration: some recent experiences of the Royal Society for the protection of birds. Landscape Res 25:394–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer KWL (1974) The international council for bird preservation. Het Vogeljaar 22:611

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowley A (2007) The great fen—a waterland for the future. Br Wildl 18:415–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer T, Polasky S (2004) Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24:744–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM (2011) Classification of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Carp E (1980) A directory of wetlands of international importance in the western Palearctic wetlands. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Gland, Switzerland, p 506

    Google Scholar 

  • Carty A, Scholz M, Heal K, Gouriveau F, Mustafa A (2008) The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for Farm Constructed Wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresour Technol 99:6780–6792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coast E (2002) Demography of the Marsh Arabs. In: Nicholson E, Clark P (eds) The Iraqi marshlands: a human and environmental study. Politico’s, London, pp 19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. http://www.tematea.org/?q=node/1312&PHPSESSID=d324807c78b71c5ec5c6299c28f56d0a

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Operational guidance for application of the ecosystem approach. http://www.cbd.int/ecosystem/operational.shtml. Accessed 18 May 2010

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks S, Turner RK, Pethig JS, Parry ML (2001) Managing catchment-coastal floodplains: the need for a UK water and wetlands policy. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) Working Paper PA 01-01, University of East Anglia, Norwich, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE, Alford GJ (1996) History of wetlands in the conterminous United States. United States Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2425:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Brown S, Haeuber RA, Hobbs NT, Huntly N, Naiman RJ, Riebsame WE, Turner MG, Valone TJ (2000) Ecological principles and guidelines for managing the use of land. Ecol Appl 10:639–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson NC, Evans PR (1987) Habitat restoration and creation: its role and potential in the conservation of waders. Wader Study Group Bulletin 49, Supplement/IWRB Special Publication 7:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham TP, Haberle SG, Lentfer C, Fullagar R, Field J, Therin M, Porch N, Winsborough B (2003) Origins of agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the highlands of New Guinea. Science 301:189–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson W (1978) Some effects of the acidification of Swedish lakes. Verhandlungen Internationalen Vereinigung Theoretische Angewandte Limnologie 20:851–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson RE (1979) Federal programs influencing wetlands. Seventh Annual Michigan Landuse Policy Conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, p 246

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss NH Jr, Smith LM, Wilcox DA, Browne AB (2008) Linking ecosystem processes with wetland management goals: charting a course for a sustainable future. Wetlands 28:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frayer WE, Monahan TJ, Bowden DC, Graybill FA (1983) Status and trends of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the conterminous United States, 1950s to 1970s. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RC, Davidson NC (2011) The Ramsar convention. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert G, Tyler GA, Dunn CJ, Smith KJ (2005) Nesting habitat selection by bitterns Botaurus stellaris in Britain and the implications for wetland management. Biol Conserv 124:547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS (1992) Functions of nature: evaluation of nature in environmental planning, management and decision-making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, p 345

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot RS, Stuip MAM, Finlayson CM, Davidson N (2006) Valuing wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services. Ramsar Technical Report No. 3/CBD Technical Series No. 27. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, p 46

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol 34:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2007) The ecosystem concept and identification of ecosystem goods and services in english policy context. Review Paper to Defra, London, UK. Project code NR0107, p 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L-A, Broenmark C, Nilsson PA, Aabjoernsson K (2005) Conflicting demands on wetland ecosystem services: nutrient retention, biodiversity or both? Freshw Biol 50:705–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington R, McInnes RJ (2009) Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) for livestock wastewater management. Bioresour Technol 100:5498–5505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington R, Ryder C (2002) The use of integrated constructed wetlands in the management of farmyard runoff and waste water. In: Proceeding of the National Hydrology Seminar on Water Resources Management Sustainable Supply and Demand. The Irish National Committees of the IHP (International Hydrological Programme) and ICID (International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage), Tullamore, pp 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington R, Dunne EJ, Carroll P, Keohane J, Ryder C (2005) The concept, design and performance of integrated constructed wetlands for the treatment of farmyard dirty water. In: Dunne EJ, Reddy KR, Carton OT (eds) Nutrient management in agricultural watersheds: a wetlands solution. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris LE (1953) Vermuyden and the fens. Cleaver Hume Press, London, p 168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R (2011) Acknowledging and benefitting from multiple perspectives. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsman T (1999) Temporal and spatial trends of lake acidity in northern Sweden. J Paleolimnol 22:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusler JA (1983) Our national wetland heritage—a protection guidebook. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffoley D d’A, Maltby E, Vincent MA, Mee L, Dunn E, Gilliland P, Hamer JP, Mortimer D, Pound D (2004) The ecosystem approach. Coherent actions for marine and coastal environments. A Report to the UK Government. English Nature, Peterborough, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  • LePage BA (2011) Wetlands: a multidisciplinary perspective. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E (1986) Waterlogged wealth: why waste the world’s wet places. Earthscan, London, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E (2009a) The changing wetland paradigm. In: Maltby E, Barker T (eds) The wetlands handbook. Blackwell, West Sussex, p 800

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E (2009b) Functional assessment of wetlands: towards a valuation of ecosystem services. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, p 712

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby E, Hogan DV, McInnes RJ (1996) Functional analysis of european wetland ecosystems—phase I (FAEWE): the functioning of river marginal wetland ecosystems—improving the science base for the development of procedures of functional analysis. Final Report EC DG XII CT90-0084. EUR 16132. Office of the Official Publications of European Communities, Brussels, Belgium, p 448

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes RJ (2007) Integrating ecosystem services within a 50-year vision for wetlands. Unpublished WWT Report to the England Wetland Vision Partnership, Slimbridge, p 34

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes RJ (2008) Why wetlands matter to people. Environ Sci 17:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes RJ, Maltby E, Neuber MS, Rostron CP (1998) Functional analysis: transforming expert knowledge into a practical management tool. In: McCabe AJ, Davis JA (eds) Wetlands for the future. Gleneagles Publishing, Adelaide, pp 407–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton B (2011) Multidisciplinary approaches to climate change questions. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Minich N (2011) The role of landscape architects and wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitlin D, Thompson J (1995) Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environ Urban 7:231–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris J, Gowing DJG, Mills J, Dunderdale JAL (2000) Reconciling agricultural economic and environmental objectives: the case of recreating wetlands in the Fenland area of eastern England. Agric Ecosyst Environ 79:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyman JA (2011) Ecological functions of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Wetlands—their use and regulation, OTA-O-206. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, p 208

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive co-management for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manage 34:75–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pound D (2009) The eco what approach? ECOS 30:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CJ, Hussain NA (2006) Restoring the Garden of Eden: an ecological assessment of the marshes of Iraq. BioScience 56:477–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson CJ, Reiss P, Hussain NA, Alwash AJ, Pool DJ (2005) The restoration potential of the Mesopotamian marshes of Iraq. Science 307:1307–1311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson MM (2004) The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 35:361–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salyer JC II, Gillet FG (1964) Federal refuges. In: Linduska JP (ed) Waterfowl tomorrow. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 497–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M, Harrington R, Carroll P, Mustafa A (2007) The Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands 27:337–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Pedrini P, Marchesi L (2003) Reconciling the dichotomy between single species and ecosystem conservation: black kites (Milvus migrans) and eutrophication in pre-Alpine lakes. Biol Conserv 110:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd G (2004) The ecosystem approach: five steps to implementation. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Springate-Baginski O, Allen D, Darwall WRT (2009) An integrated wetland assessment toolkit: a guide to good practice. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland, p 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Thesiger W (1964) The marsh arabs. Penguin Classics, London, p 256

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Söderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35:7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Brouwer R (2003) Introduction. In: Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Brouwer R (eds) Managing wetlands: an ecological economics approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Congress Public Law (1954) Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act. US Congress PL566, August 4, 1954, 68 Stat 666

    Google Scholar 

  • Vira B, Adams WM (2009) Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: beware the silver bullet. Conserv Lett 2:158–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Carpenter SR, Anderies J, Abel N, Cumming GS, Janssen M, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R (2002) Resilience management in social–ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology 6:14 [online]. www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood A, van Halsema GE (2008) Scoping agriculture-wetlands interactions towards a sustainable multiple-response strategy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Water Report No. 33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 155

    Google Scholar 

  • Young G (1977) Return to the marshes: life with the marsh Arabs of Iraq. Collins, London, p 224

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. McInnes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McInnes, R.J. (2011). Managing Wetlands for Multifunctional Benefits. In: LePage, B. (eds) Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0551-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics