Abstract
Today wetland managers and practitioners are faced with considerable challenges and responsibilities. Not only do they need to consider and fully understand all of the traditional components of wetland science such as ecology, geology, and engineering, but also, the aesthetic, socio-political, and economic aspects of the discipline. Nevertheless, over the last several decades the science of wetlands in the United States has matured and significant progress has been made in the area of wetland creation, restoration, and enhancement. However, despite changing attitude towards wetlands many projects still end in failure; a result due largely to adherence to outdated process-driven models, the lack or inability to effectively communicate to project team members and society, and the continued compartmentalization of the various disciplines and practitioners involved in wetland projects. Here the contributions and opportunities that the diverse disciplines bring to the science are illustrated and the importance of effective communication within a proposed adaptive management strategy is presented and discussed. This new adaptive management strategy will allow wetland practitioners to move away from prescribed process driven approaches such as our “no net loss” policy, to one that is more flexible and adaptive to society’s needs. As the emerging greenhouse gas market develops new wetland valuation methods will emerge and wetland practitioners, society, and the regulatory agencies will need to work collaboratively to react quickly and strike a balance between creating wetlands that maximize profitability with respect to the carbon and nitrogen markets and wetlands that provide other ecosystem services.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbier EB, Acreman M, Knowler D (1997) Economic valuation of wetlands, a guide for policy makers and planners. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, p 143
Boyd JW, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626
Bradley GA (1995) Urban forest landscapes: integrating multidisciplinary perspective. University of Washington Press, Seattle, p 224
Brinson MM (1993) A hydrogeomorphic classification for wetlands. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Washington, DC, p 101. http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/wetlands/wlpubs.html
Brinson MM (2011) Classification of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Cole CA, Kentula ME (2011) Monitoring and assessment—what to measure … and why. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Connolly KD (2006) Wetlands law and policy: understanding Section 404. American Bar Association, Chicago, p 522
Council on Environmental Quality (2008) Conserving America’s wetlands 2008: four years of partnering resulted in accomplishing the president’s goal. The White House Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, p 57
Dahl TE (2006) Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1998 to 2004. United States Department of the Interior and United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, p 112
Dahl TE, Allord GJ (1996) History of wetlands in the conterminous United States. In: Fretwell JD, Williams JS, Redman PJ (eds) National water summary on wetland resources, United States Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2425. United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC, pp 19–26. http://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/history.html
de Wet A, Williams CJ, Tomlinson J, Carlson Loy E (2011) Stream and sediment dynamics in response to Holocene landscape changes in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Dunnett N, Clayden A (2007) Rain gardens: managing water sustainably in the garden and designed landscape. Timber Press, Portland, p 188
Euliss NH, Smith LM, Wilcox DA, Browne BA (2008) Linking ecosystem processes with wetland management goals: charting a course for a sustainable future. Wetlands 28:553–562
Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68:643–653
France RL (2002) Wetland design: principles and practices for landscape architects and land use planners. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, p 160
Gardner RC, Davidson NC (2011) The Ramsar convention. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Gwin SE, Kentula ME, Shaffer PW (1999) Evaluating the effects of wetland regulation through hydrogeomorphic classification and landscape profiles. Wetlands 19:477–489
Hwang L, LePage BA (2011) Floating islands: an alternative to urban wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Kadlec RH, Wallace S (2008) Treatment wetlands, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1048
Kaplan R (2011) Acknowledging and benefitting from multiple perspectives. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Kaplan R, Kaplan S (2008) Bringing out the best in people: a psychological perspective. Conserv Biol 22:826–829
Keddy PA (2000) Wetland ecology: Principles and conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p 614
Kiesecker JM, Copeland H, Pocewicz A, McKenney B (2010) Development by design: blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Front Ecol Environ 5:261–266
LePage BA (2007a) Reconstructing wetland vegetation using pollen and the plant fossil record for wetland creation and enhancement. Society of Wetland Scientists Annual International Meeting, Sacramento, 10–15 June 2007
LePage BA (2007b) Use of the pollen and the plant fossils for wetland creation, restoration and enhancement. National watershed-wide strategies to maximize wetland ecological and social services. Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc. 28–29 Aug 2007
Magee TK, Kentula ME (2005) Response of wetland plant species to hydrologic conditions. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13:163–181
Magee TK, Ernst TL, Kentula ME, Dwire KA (1999) Floristic comparison of freshwater wetlands in an urbanizing environment. Wetlands 19:517–534
McInnis RJ (2011) Managing wetlands for multifunctional benefits. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Middleton B (2011) Multidisciplinary approaches to climate change questions. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis: a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, p 68
Minich N (2011) The role of landscape architects and wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (1986) Wetlands. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p 539
Murray B, Jenkins A, Kramer R, Faulkner SP (2009) Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands in the Mississippi alluvial valley. Ecosystem Services Series NI R 09-02. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, p 43
Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Ringold P, Landers D, Weber M (2010) Potential indicators of ecosystem services in wetlands. 2010 Society of Wetland Scientists Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, 27 June–2 July 2010
Nowak DJ, Twardus D, Scott CT (2000) Proposal for urban forest health monitoring in the US. Society of American Foresters National Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC, pp 178–183
Nyman JA (2011) Ecological functions of wetlands. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Pendelton LH (2009) The economic and market value of coasts and estuaries: what’s at stake? Restore America’s Estuaries, Arlington, p 175
Ramsar (2010) http://www.ramsar.org. Accessed 4 June 2010
Robertson M, Hough P (2011) Wetlands regulation: the case of mitigation under section 404 of the clean water act. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
United States Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Valuing the protection of ecological systems and services: a report of the EPA science advisory board, EPA-SAB-09-012. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, p 121
United States Environmental Protection Agency (2010) http://www.epa.gov/ecology/publications.htm
Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L (2008) Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow I. Springer, New York, p 566
Williams CJ (2011) A paleoecological perspective on wetland restoration. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
World Bank (2007) Global economic prospects 2007: managing the next wave of globalization. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DC, p 180
Zeff ML (2011) The necessity for multi-disciplinary approaches to wetland design and adaptive management: the case of wetland channels. In: LePage BA (ed) Wetlands—integrating multidisciplinary concepts. Springer, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
LePage, B.A. (2011). Wetlands: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. In: LePage, B. (eds) Wetlands. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0551-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0551-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0550-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0551-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)