Advertisement

The Development of Quality-of-Life Indicators in Rural Areas in Iran: Case Study – Khaveh Shomali District, Lorestan Province

  • Mohammad Reza RezvaniEmail author
  • Hossain Mansourian
Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 3)

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a complex and multidimensional concept relevant to community conditions in a specific geographic region, and it is traditionally captured using both objective and subjective indicators. QOL indicators are typically used to monitor and evaluate community development in relation to the social, health, environmental, and economic aspects in a community. The goal of this case study is to illustrate the measurement of QOL in the rural district of Khaveh Shomali (Iran) using two different approaches: objective and subjective indicators. The data were gathered through survey of a random sample of 210 heads of the households in the Khaveh Shomali district. The results indicate that QOL is “poor” in about 34% of the households, “moderate” in more than 45%, and “good” in 21%. We conclude by recommending that effective planning and management by the government with the participation of community leaders are necessary to improve QOL.

Keywords

Life Domain Rural Household Subjective Indicator Average National Level Lorestan Province 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Clarke, M., Islam, S., & Paech, S. (2006). Measuring Australia’s well-being using hierarchical needs. Journal of Socio-Economics, 35, 933–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., et al. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, Ed. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hardi, P., & Pinter, L. (2006). City of Winnipeg quality-of-life indicators. Social Indicators Research Series, 28, 127–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kharazmi, S. (2004). Quality of life and necessaries of digital age in Iran. Economy Worlds Newspapers, No: 9–12, Tehran.Google Scholar
  7. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  8. Max-Neef, M. (1992). Development and human needs. In P. Ekins, M. Max-Neef (Eds.), Real life economics: Understanding wealth creation (pp. 97–213). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing – A social geographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pal, A. K., & Kumar, U. C. (2005). Quality of life concept for the elevation of societal development of rural community in West Bengal, India. Asia Pacific Journal of Rural Development, 2, 83–93.Google Scholar
  11. Rafeepour, F. (1985). Rural societies and theirs needs. Tehran: Enteshar Publication Co.Google Scholar
  12. Rezvani, M. R. ( 2004). An introduction to rural development planning in Iran. Tehran: Ghoomes Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Geography, University of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations