Advertisement

Integrating Tourism into Sustainable Urban Development: Indicators from a Croatian Coastal Community

  • Branko I. CavricEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 3)

Abstract

This case study gives an example how the cities of post-socialist Croatia could use urban indicators for monitoring and measuring the progress toward sustainability. Such information would enable planners and decision makers to formulate redistributive policies and programs addressing some of the disparities that exist in a post-socialist city. It focuses on the current situation in the emerging Croatian coastal city of Zadar, which reflects the diversity of the post-socialist urban change in a very fragile Mediterranean landscape. It describes the participatory approach through which different local communities were evaluating the quality of life based on five basic pillars of sustainability. Through direct participant involvement and in-depth interviews, the research team has managed to develop a structured and multilayered GIS database suitable for decision makers at the city and local levels. The conceptual implications of the findings contribute to rebuilding of “bottom-up” participatory approach in the process of creation and management of urban spaces.

Keywords

Local Community Geographic Information System Coastal City Urban Sustainability Sustainable Urban Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Support provided by the National Foundation for Science Higher Education and Technological Development (NZZ) of the Republic of Croatia made this research possible from the start, but thanks are due in particular to Prof. Pero Lučin, Barbara Tenčić, and Sandra Milovanović for their industrious administrative support. The author wishes to thank Prof. Damir Magaš and all other colleagues from the Department of Geography, University of Zadar, for their cooperation and the conducive atmosphere provided during his study leave in Croatia. Also, special thanks are extended to immediate collaborators, PhD students, Ante Šiljeg and Silvija Toplek for their valuable efforts in executing the field survey activities and transcribing numerous GIS records into a series of maps and charts. Additional credit should also be given to Nives Kožulić, Stjepan Gverić, and Dejana Hordov all from the Department of Urbanism, Zadar for their assistance in securing numerous professional contacts and preparing the most recent planning data.

References

  1. AZO. (2006). Annual Report, National Agency for Environment Zagreb.Google Scholar
  2. Berke, P., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosch, P. (2002). The European environment agency focuses on EU-policy in its approach to sustainable development indicators. Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, 19, IOS Press, 5–18.Google Scholar
  4. Budić, Z., & Cavrić, B. (2006). Waves of planning: A framework for studying the evolution of planning systems and empirical insights from Serbia and Montenegro. Planning Perspectives, 21, 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (1989). Informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Cavrić, B. (2009). Developing the System of Indicators for Sustainable Urban Development in selected coastal cities of Croatia, National Association for Science (NZZ) of the Republic of Croatia, Program “Guest”, Rijeka, Croatia (Final Report in Croatian language)Google Scholar
  7. Cavrić, B. (2009a). Sustainability and its complements as the new paradigm in Croatian planning theory and practice. Geoadria, 14(1), 61–86.Google Scholar
  8. Cavrić, B., & Nedović-Budić, Z. (2007). Urban development, legislation, and planning in post-socialist Zagreb, 373–398. In K. Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city – Urban form and space transformations in central and Eastern Europe after socialism. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Cavrić, B., Toplek, S., & Šiljeg, A. (2008). Participatory measurements of sustainable urban development and quality of life in post-socialist Zadar (Croatia), SPATIUM, International Review, No. 17/18, pp. 53–76.Google Scholar
  10. Crevar, A. (2008) After 2.000 years, a Croatian Port town still seduces. New York Times, July 6 2008.Google Scholar
  11. Croatian National Committee for Habitat. (2003) Bulletin – Summary, No. 1, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, H. (1973). Toward a steady-state economy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, H. E., & Cobb, J. B., Jr. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. EPA – European Environmental Agency. (2002). Towards an urban atlas: Assessment of spatial data on 25 European cities and urban areas, Environmental issues report No. 30, Copenhagen, Denmark. available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2002_30
  15. ESPON – European Spatial Planning Organization Network. (2006). Data Indicators of Western Balkans. Final Report.Athens.Google Scholar
  16. Flood, J. (1997). Urban and housing indicators. Urban Studies, 34(10), 1635–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gahin, R., & Paterson, C. (2001). Community indicators: Past, present and future. National Civic Review, 90(4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh, S., Vale, R., & Vale, B. (2006). Indications from sustainability indicators. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golubic, M., & Marusic, I. (2007). Developing and integrated approach for public participation: A case of land-use planning in Slovenia. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(6), 993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gredier, W. (1998). One world ready or not: The manic logic of global of global capitalism. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, P. (1999). The future cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamilton, I., Dimitrovska-Andrews, K., & Pichler-Milanović, N. (Eds.). (2007). Transformation of cities in central and Eastern Europe – Towards globalization. Tokyo-New York-Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, M. (1999). Guide to sustainable community indicators (2nd ed.). North Andover, MA, USA: Hart Environmental data.Google Scholar
  24. Hirt, S. (2008). Landscapes of post-modernity: Changes in the built fabric of Belgrade and Sofia since the end of socialism. Urban Geography, 29(8), 785–809.Google Scholar
  25. Hirt, S., & Stanilov, K. (2009) Revisiting Urban Planning in the Transitional Countries, Regional Study prepared for Planning Sustainable Cities: Global Report on Human Settlements 2009, Available from http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2009
  26. Hoernig, H., & Seasons, M. (2004). Monitoring of indicators in local and regional planning practice: Concepts and issues, planning. Practice and Research, 19(1), 81–99.Google Scholar
  27. Holden, M. (2006). Urban indicators and the integrative ideals of cities. Cities, 23(3), 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2000). Indicators for sustainable communities: A strategy building on complexity theory and distributed intelligence. Planning Theory and Practice, 1(2), 173–186.Google Scholar
  29. Laurini, R. (2001). Information systems for urban planning – A hypermedia co-operative approach. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  30. Leburić, A., Maroević, M., & Šuljug, Z. (2005) Legal Illegality: Sociological Research of Unplanned Construction in Split, naklada Bošković, Split (Croatian edition)Google Scholar
  31. McMahon, S. K. (2002). The development of quality of life indicators – a case study from the city of Bristol, UK. Ecological Indicators, 2, 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the limits. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  33. Milovanovic, D. (2001). Civic networks: Yugoslav cities, ISOCARP (International Society of City and Regional Planners) Case Studies Platform, http://www.unesco.org/most/isocarp/proceedings2001/cases/cs01_1201/index.htm
  34. Minnesota Planning. (1998). Minnesota milestones 1998: Proposed revisions. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Planning.Google Scholar
  35. Moles, R., Foley, W., Morrissey, J., & O’Regan, B. (2008). Practical appraisal of sustainable development – Methodologies for sustainability measurement at settlement level. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28, 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niemeijer, D., & Groot, R. S. (2008). Framing environmental indicators: Moving from causal chains to causal networks. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noll, H.-H. (2002). Towards a European system of social indicators: Theoretical framework and system architecture. Social Indicators Research, 58, 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. OECD. (1997). Better understanding our cities: The role of urban indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  39. OECD. (1999). Environmental indicators: OECD core set. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Repetti, A., & Prélaz-Droux, R. (2003). An Urban Monitor as support for a participative management of developing cities. Habitat International, 27, 653–667.Google Scholar
  41. Revvi, A., & Dube, M. (1999). Indicators for urban environmental services in Lucknow – process and methods. Environment & Urbanization, 11(3), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54, 73–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saskia, S. (1991). The global city: New York – London – Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sawicki, D. (2002). Improving community indicator systems: Injecting more social science into the folk movement. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), 13–32.Google Scholar
  45. Selman, P., & Parker, J. (1997). Citizenship, civicness and social capital in local agenda 21. Local Environment, 2(2), 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smolko, R. S., Strange, C. J., & Venetoulis, J. (2006). The community indicators handbook – Measuring progress toward healthy and sustainable communities (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Redefining Progress.Google Scholar
  47. Spreng, D., & Wils, A. (1996) Indicators of Sustainability: Indicators in various Scientific Disciplines, Paper written in support of the Multidimensional approaches to Sustainability: The Framing Project proposed to the Alliance for Global Sustainability.Google Scholar
  48. Stanilov, K. (Ed.) (2007). The post-socialist city. Urban form and space transformations in central and Eastern Europe after socialism (GeoJournal Library Vol. 92). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Stephen, G. (1997). Cities in the real-time age: The paradigm challenge of telecommunications to the conception and planning of urban space. Environment and Planning A, 29, 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stuart, D. (1972). Urban indicators: Their role in planning. Planning Advisory Service – PAS, 281, 1–21.Google Scholar
  51. Tsenkova, S. (2000). Post-social cities in globalizing world. Available at: http://www.ucalgary.ca~tsenkova
  52. Tsenkova, S. (2003). Post-socialist cities in globalizing world. PLANUM. 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.planum.net/topics/east-tsenkova.html
  53. UBC – University of British Columbia. (1994). Task force on healthy and sustainable communities – Tools for sustainability: Iteration and implementation. In C. Chu & R. Simpson (Eds.), The ecological public health: From vision to practice. Australia: University of Toronto Centre for Health Promotion and Institute for Applied Research at Griffith University.Google Scholar
  54. UNCED. (1992). Earth Summit – Agenda 21, The United Nations Programme for Actions from Rio, Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED). Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992.Google Scholar
  55. UNCHS. (1994–1996) Indicators Programme: Monitoring Human Settlements. Vol. 1 Introduction, Vol. 2 Urban Indicators Worksheet, Vol. 4 Taking Gender into Account.Google Scholar
  56. UNCHS Habitat – United Nations Centre for Human Settlements – (2001) Cities in globalizing World. Global Report on Human Settlements. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  57. UNDES – United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (1998) From Theory to Practice: Indicators for Sustainable Development. (available at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdeve/indi6.htm)
  58. UNDSD – United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. (2004) (available at: http://wwwun.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isd.htm)
  59. Vujović, S., & Petrović, M. (2007). Belgrade’s post-socialist urban revolution: Reflections by the actors in the development process. In K. Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city. Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism (GeoJournal Library Vol. 92, pp. 361–384). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. WHO. (1993). Healthy city indicators. Copenhagen: WHO.Google Scholar
  61. WRI – World Resources Institute. (1995) Environmental Indicators – A Systematic Approach to measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  62. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Erath. Gabriola Island, BC Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Weclawowicz, G. (2005). The Warsaw metropolitan area on the eve of Poland’s integration into the European union. In I. Hamilton, K. Dimitrovska-Andrews, & N. Pichler-Milovanović (Eds.), Transformation of cities in central and Eastern Europe: Towards globalization. Tokyo-New York-Paris: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Westfall, M. S., & De Villa, V. A. (Eds.). (2001). Urban indicators for managing cities. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  65. Wong, C. (2002). Developing indicators to inform local economic development in England. Urban Studies, 39(10), 1833–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Bank. (2003). World development indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  67. Zegras, C., Poduje, I., Foutz, W., Ben-Joseph, E., & Figueroa, O. (2004). Indicators for sustainable urban development. In M. Keiner, et al. (Eds.), From understanding to action, 157–189. Springer, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BotswanaGaboroneBotswana

Personalised recommendations