Skip to main content

Moving from Evidence to Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The research that forms the basis of this book employed an action research methodology. This chapter explains the main assumptions underlying action research (ontological, epistemological, methodological, and social purposes) and how our research was designed to address these. Examples of direct actions taken during the research process and based on the research findings are provided.

Based on our research process and findings, members of our research team initiated and supported a variety of activities at the departmental, institutional, national, and international levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1991). Participatory action research and action science compared. A commentary. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 85–96). Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation. Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2010). Challenging the taken-for-granted. How research might inform doctoral education policy and practice. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Doctoral Education SIG, Denver, CO (May).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Norton, J. (2006). Reframing our approach to doctoral programs: A learning perspective. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2010). Living and imagining academic identities: Perceptions of doctoral students and pre-tenure academics. In L. McAlpine & G. Akerlind (Eds.), Visions of academic practice: The public and personal faces of becoming an academic in the social sciences (pp. 125–154). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. (1993). Problem-based methodology: Research for the improvement of practice. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, M. (2003). Graduate student conundrum. University Affairs, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl Amundsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amundsen, C., McAlpine, L. (2011). Moving from Evidence to Action. In: McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C. (eds) Doctoral Education: Research-Based Strategies for Doctoral Students, Supervisors and Administrators. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics