Abstract
Integrated water resources management (IWRM) has been widely adopted as an over-arching framework for managing river basins. However, tensions are inherent in IWRM between top-down and bottom-up approaches to management. In seeking to move away from fragmented toward more integrative approaches to bio-regional natural resource management at the level of the river basin, IWRM initiatives also tend to centralise. Yet a participatory ideal, or at least rhetoric, is seen in “stakeholder-based” and other more inclusive approaches to basin management. In the Mekong, these approaches are seen in the Mekong River Commission’s basin development stakeholder processes, subarea-based planning, and the establishment of river basin organisations. These are essentially top-down driven approaches to participation. On the other hand, some regional NGO initiatives, broad coalitions such as “Save the Mekong”, community-based networks such as the 3SPN network in Cambodia, and decentralised irrigation management in its various forms, apply participation from the ground up and often seek to challenge projects that result from immense pressures for development of the river and its tributaries for hydropower. We need to move our understanding of IWRM in river basin governance away from a technical, “best practice” approach, toward recognition of its inherently political nature and its embeddedness in cultural practices at various levels.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnstein S (1971) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35:216–224
Baird IG (2002) A community-based study of the downstream impacts of the Yali Falls dam along the Se San, Sre Pok and Sekong rivers in stung treng province, Northeast Cambodia, Se San Protection Network Project, Partners For Development (PFD), Non Timber Forest Products Project (NTFP), Se San District Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Office, Stung Treng District Office
Biswas A (2004) Integrated water resources management: a re-assessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256
Chou C (2010) The local governance of common pool resources: the case of irrigation water in Cambodia. Cambodian Development Resource Institute, Phnom Penh
Cohen PT, Pearson RE (1998) Communal irrigation, state and capital in the Chiang Mai valley. J Southeast Asian Stud 29(1):86–111
Cooke B, Kothari U (eds) (2001) Participation: the new tyrrany? Zed Books, London
Daravy K (2010) Challenges of participatory irrigation management in Cambodia: the case of Damnak Ampil irrigation scheme. MSc, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, p 183
Edmunds D, Wollenberg E (2001) A stretegic approach to multistakeholder negotiations. Dev Chang 32:231–253
Geertz C (1972) The wet and the dry: traditional irrigation in Bali and Morocco. Hum Ecol 1:34–39
Hirsch P (1997) Seeing forests for trees: environment and environmentalism in Thailand. Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai
Hirsch P (2008) 13 years of bad luck? a reflection on MRC and civil society in the Mekong. Watershed 12(3):38–43
Hirsch P (2010) Critique of draft basin development strategy. 3rd regional stakeholder forum. Vientiane, Lao PDR. Available at http://www.mrcmekong.org/download/3rd-stakeholder-forum/2.2-Philip-Critique-of-MRC-IWRM-Based-Basin-Dev-Strategy.pdf
Hirsch P, Lohmann L (1989) Contemporary politics of environment in Thailand. Asian Surv 29(4):439–451
Hirsch P, Wyatt A (2004) Negotiating local livelihoods: scales of conflict in the Se San River Basin. Asia Pac Viewpoint 45(1):51–68
Hirsch P, Jensen KM, Boer B, Carrard N, FitzGerald S, Lyster R (2006) National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong. Australian Mekong Resource Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Sydney in collaboration with Danida, Sydney
Lansing S (1987) Balinese ‘water temples’ and the management of irrigation. Am Anthropol 89(2):326–341
Li T (2007) The will to improve: governmentality, development and the practice of politics. Duke University Press, Durham
Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, storylines and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):131–156
Molle F, Floch P (2007) Water, poverty and the governance of megaprojects: the Thai “water grid”. Unit for Social and Environmental Research, Chiang Mai University, M-POWER, Chiang Mai
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2007) Independent, organisational, financial and institutional review of the Mekong river commission secretariat and the national Mekong committees: final report. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, p 68
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2010a) Draft minute: the 1st 7L sub-area meeting champasak grand hotel, Champasak province, 25–26 Feb 2010
MRC (Mekong River Commission) (2010b) Stakeholder analysis for the MRC basin development plan program phase 2: final report. Mekong River Commission, Vientiane, p 104
Osborne M (2009) The Mekong: river under threat, Lowy Institute Paper 27, Lowy Institute for International Policy, Sydney
Sheldon T (2005) River basin management: a negotiated approach. Both ENDS and Gomukh, Amsterdam
Thongdeelert C (1997) Cultural bioregionalism: towards a natural balance. Watershed People Forum Ecol 2(3):26–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirsch, P. (2011). IWRM as a Participatory Governance Framework for the Mekong River Basin?. In: Öjendal, J., Hansson, S., Hellberg, S. (eds) Politics and Development in a Transboundary Watershed. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0476-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0476-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0475-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0476-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)