Abstract
Abstract Mathematics teacher educators have sought to play a major role in reforming mathematics education through the preparation of new teachers entering the field; however, the impact of their efforts is often quickly lost when the powerful pedagogical practices and beliefs about constructivism as a theory of learning acquired during their pre-service programs are not shared with the established cultures they enter as beginning teachers. As a mathematics teacher educator, I have struggled with this reality since I entered the field in the mid 1990s. To attempt to imbue my teachers with the habits of mind that will sustain them in the face of resistance from their colleagues, I have structured my class around reflective writing and discussion of critical incidents they experience while completing their field experiences. At the end of the semester, my students write a final paper that describes how their personal philosophy of teaching has evolved over the course of the semester, and what has influenced that evolution. In this chapter, I will report on my self-study and analysis of my students’ final papers and summarize the themes that emerge. I discuss what I have learned about the effectiveness of these activities and about the difficulties of preparing teachers to enter their own classrooms with strong beliefs about the importance of teaching for understanding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 219–225.
Goodell, J. E. (2000). Learning to teach mathematics for understanding: The role of reflection. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 48–61.
Goodell, J. E. (2002). Learning to teach for understanding through reflecting on critical incidents in an integrated mathematics methods and practicum course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. San Antonio, TX.
Goodell, J. E. (2006). Using critical incident reflections: A self-study as a mathematics teacher educator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(3), 221–248.
LaBoskey, V. (2008). The fragile strengths of self-study: Making bold claims and clear connections. In P. Aubusson & S. Schuck (Eds.), Teacher learning and development: The mirror maze (pp. 251–262). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Schuck, S. (2002). Using self-study to challenge my teaching practice in mathematics education. Reflective Practice, 3(3), 327–337.
Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing qualitative research: A comprehensive guide. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodell, J.E. (2011). Reforming Mathematics Teacher Education Through Self-Study. In: Schuck, S., Pereira, P. (eds) What Counts in Teaching Mathematics. Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0461-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0461-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0460-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0461-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)