Abstract
In a short span of two decades, the ecological footprint concept as a framework for impact assessment and sustainability planning through the focus on earthly “capital” limits in the form of land resources has grown in popularity. A unique selling point of the concept is its focus on physical limits, thereby making it an “area-based analogue” of other popular impact assessment methodologies. In this chapter, a critical re-examination of the presentation of ecological footprint information is attempted with reference to past studies. In particular, the aspect of “spatiality” and “visualization” of the ecological footprint is explored by juxtaposing popular presentation techniques with the original goals of ecological footprint analysis. The result of the discussion is an identification of several shortcomings inherent in presentation techniques in ecological footprint literature and a subsequent suggestion of a standardized, spatial presentation technique that is in-line with present trajectories in the field of study. The ultimate aim of this chapter is to allow the various manifestations of ecological consumptions to be “mapped” in a comparable and meaningful manner (and traced dynamically), with a degree of flexibility among the different approaches to ecological footprint analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bicknell, K. B., Ball, R. J., Cullen, R. & Bigsby, H. R. (1998). New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy. Ecological Economics, 27(2): 149–160.
Browne, D., O’Regan, B. & Moles, R. (2008). Use of ecological footprinting to explore alternative transport policy scenarios in an Irish city-region. Transportation Research (Part D), 13(5): 315–322.
Cai, H. S., Zhang, X. L. & Zhu, D. H. (2007). Study of ecological capacity change and quantitative analysis of ecological compensation in a nature reserve based on RS and GIS: a case study on Po-yang Lake Nature Reserve, China. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 50(5): 757–766.
Chi, G. & Stone, B. (2005). Sustainable transport planning: estimating the ecological footprint of vehicle travel in future years. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 131(3): 170–180.
Erb, K. H. (2004). Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, 21(3): 247–259.
Ferng, J. J. (2001). Using composition of land multiplier to estimate ecological footprints associated with production activity. Ecological Economics, 37(2): 159–172.
Global Footprint Network (2008). Sweden country trend. Online Article. 26 Oct 2008. http://www.footprintnetwork.org. Accessed 19 February 2009.
Haberl, H., Erb, K. H. & Krausmann, F. (2001). How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926–1995. Ecological Economics, 38(1): 25–45.
Herva, M., Franco, A., Ferreiro, S., Alvarez, A. & Roca, E. (2008). An approach for the application of the ecological footprint as environmental indicator in the textile sector. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156(2–3): 478–487.
Holden, E. & Hoyer, K. G. (2005). The ecological footprints of fuels. Transportation Research (Part D), 10(5): 395–403.
Hu, D., Huang, S., Feng, Q., Li, F., Zhao, J., Zhao, Y. & Wang, B. (2008). Relationships between rapid urban development and the appropriation of ecosystems in Jiangyin city, Eastern China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(3): 180–191.
Lammers, A., Moles, R., Walsh, C. & Huijbregts, M. (2008). Ireland’s footprint: a time series for 1983–2001. Land Use Policy, 25(1): 53–58.
Liu, P. J. & Kobayashi, E. (2006). Health assessment and environmental impacts of modal shift in transportation. Oceans 2006 – Asia Pacific conference, May 16–19 2006, Volumes 1 and 2, pp. 127–132. Singapore.
Müniz, I. & Galindo, A. (2005). Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona. Ecological Economics, 55(4): 499–514.
Rees, W. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2): 121–130.
Rees, W. (1996). Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. Population and Environment, 17(3): 195–215.
Rees, W. (2000). Eco-footprint analysis: merits and brickbats. Ecological Economics, 32(3): 371–374.
Rees, W. & Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: Measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy. In A. M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke & R. Costanza (Eds.), Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability (pp. 362–390). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Rees, W. E. & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4–6): 223–248.
Scotti, M., Bondavalli, C. & Bodini, A. (2009). Ecological footprint as a tool for local sustainability: the municipality of Piacenza (Italy) as a case study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(1): 39–50.
Van den Bergh, J. & Verbruggen, H. (1999). Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of “ecological footprint”. Ecological Economics, 29(1): 61–72.
Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Community and Regional Planning. The University of British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada.
Wackernagel, N., Lewan, L. & Hansson, C. B. (1999). Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: applications in Sweden and subregions. Ambio, 28(7): 604–612.
Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H. & Schulz, N. B. (2004). Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an “actual land area” approach. Land Use Policy, 21(3): 261–269.
Wackernagel, M. & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chin, HC., Li, R.M. (2011). Presentation of Ecological Footprint Information: A Re-examination. In: Wong, TC., Yuen, B. (eds) Eco-city Planning. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0383-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0383-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0382-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0383-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)