Skip to main content

Assessing the Economic Aspects of Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landscape Indicators

Abstract

There are many economic aspects associated with landscape. Firstly, landscape is an “externality”, as the economic activities involving the use and transformation of landscape have different effects and repercussions on the same; secondly, landscape, especially in modern society, is seen more and more as a limited resource, and is therefore perceived as an “economic good”. In consideration of these assumptions, the current chapter will examine the main indicators used in literature to assess the economic aspects of landscape, with an interpretation on the basis of two major approaches to analysis: the “economic value” of landscape and the “economic strength” of landscape. Finally we will propose a set of indicators based on the DPSIR model on two different scales for monitoring macro transformations (regional scale) and the following in-depth study (local scale).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Scientific Literature and Applicative Researches About One Indicator or Category of Indicators

  • Berentsen PBM et al (2007) Costs and benefits of on-farm nature conservation. Ecol Econ 62:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnieux F, Le Goffe P (1997) Valuing the benefits of landscape restoration: a case study of the Cotentin in Lower-Normandy, France. J Environ Manag 50:321–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall PC et al (2003) Backcountry recreationists valuation of forest and park management features in wildness parks of western Canadian shield. In: Hanley N et al (eds) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bujosa Bestard A, Riera Font A (2009) Environmental diversity in recreational choice modelling. Ecol Econ 68(11): 2743–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S et al (2009) Amenity values of spatial configurations of forest landscapes over space and time in the southern Appalachian Highlands. Ecol Econ 68:2646–2657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicia G, Scarpa R (2000) Willingness to pay for rural landscape preservation: a case study in Mediterranean agriculture. Mattei, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchateau K (2002) PAIS: proposal on indicators for landscapes, agricultural practices and rural development at the EU level. 8th IWG.AGRI Seminar, Chateau de la Muette, Paris, 21–22 Nov 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA European Environmental Agency (2003) Environmental indicators; typology and use in reporting. EEA internal working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA European Environmental Agency (2005) Agriculture and environment in EU-15: the IRENA indicator report. http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2005_6/en/EEA_report_6_2005.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2009

  • Eser TW (1999) Economic strength . In: Nordregio, Study Programme on European Spatial Planning. Spatial criteria and their indicators

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2006) Handbook on common monitoring and evaluation framework . Draft guidance document

    Google Scholar 

  • Finco A, Tempesta T (1997) Agricoltura e assetto paesaggistico nella pianura tra Tagliamento e Isonzo. In: Tempesta T (ed) Paesaggio rurale e agro tecnologie. Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Asami Y (2007) Effect of urban landscapes on land prices in two Japanese cities. Landsc Urban Plan 81:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Sal A, Belmontes JA, Nicolau JM (2003) Assessing landscape values: a proposal for a multidimensional conceptual model. Ecol Model 168:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N et al (1998) Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environ Resour Econ 11(3–4):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F et al (2007) Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modelling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City, China. Landsc Urban Plan 79:240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsis g.e.i.e. et al (2002) Proposal on Agri-Environmental Indicators PAIS. Project summary. http://web.ccdr.alg.pt/sids/indweb/imagens/docs_extra/Outrosdocs/PAIS.pdf. Accessed July 2008

  • Marangon F, Tempesta T (2008) Proposta di indicatori economici per la valutazione del paesaggio. Estimo Territorio 5:40–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Marone E (ed) (2007) Il paesaggio agrario tra conservazione e trasformazione: valutazioni economico-estimative, giuridiche ed urbanistiche. Atti del XXXVI incontro di studio Centro di Studi di Estimo e di Economia Territoriale CeSET, Catania, 10–11 Nov 2006. Firenze University Press, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • MCPFE Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forest in Europe (1998) Pan European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forest in Europe, 2–4 June 1998. Lisbon, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • MTT Agrifood Research Finland (2002) Agri-environmental and rural development indicators: a proposal. Jokionen, Finland. http://www.mtt.fi/met/pdf/met5.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2009

  • Nordregio (2000) Criteria for spatial differentiation. In: Study Programme on European Spatial Planning (SPESP). Final report

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001a) Multifunctionality—towards an analytical framework. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001b) Environmental indicators for agriculture 3. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Oueslati W et al (2008) Hedonic estimate of agricultural landscape values in suburban areas. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Ghent, 26–28 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Piemonte in cifre (2007) Annuario statistico regionale. http://www.2007.piemonteincifre.it/set_i.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2009

  • Regione Umbria (2007) Valutazione ex post del Piano di Sviluppo Rurale 2000–2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Reho M (2007) La costruzione di indicatori per la valutazione del paesaggio. Diversi contesti di domanda. In: Castiglioni B, De Marchi M (eds) Paesaggio, sostenibilità valutazione. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Geografia, Università degli Studi di Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos JML (1998) The economic valuation of landscape change: theory and policies for land use. Elgar, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayadi S et al (2009) Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy 26:334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stellin G, Rosato P (1998) La valutazione economica dei beni ambientali. Città Studi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagliaferro C (2005) La stima del valore economico del paesaggio rurale tramite modelli edonici spaziali. Il caso di Massalubrense. Riv Economia Agraria 3:577–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta T (1993) La valutazione del paesaggio nella pianificazione territoriale. In: Franceschetti G, Tempesta T (eds) La pianificazione rurale del Veneto negli anni ottanta. Unipress, Padova

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta T (1994) I servizi ambientali del settore primario. In: Prestamburgo M, Tempesta T (eds) Sistemi produttivi, redditi agricoli e politica ambientale. Risultati di una ricerca del parco regionale dei Colli Euganei. Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta T (2006) Percezione e qualità del paesaggio. In: Tempesta T, Thiene M (eds) Percezione e valore del paesaggio. Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempesta T, Visintin F, Rizzi L, Marangon F (2002) Il valore ricreativo dei paesaggi forestali. Riv Economia Agraria 4:637–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrvainen L (1996) The amenity value of the urban forest: an application of the hedonic price method. Landsc Urban Plan 37:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuckelom M (2004) Framework for assessing sustainability levels in Belgian agricultural systems. SAFE annual report 2003. Scientific report, Brussels. http://www.geru.ucl.ac.be/recherche/projects/Safe/index.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2009

  • Verbič M, Slabe-Erker R (2009) An econometric analysis of willingness-to-pay for sustainable development: a case study of the Volčji Potok landscape area. Ecol Econ 68(5):1316–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waarts Y (2005) Indicators for the quantification of multifunctionality impacts. Series of reports of the FP6 research project MEA-Scope 4. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wascher DM (ed) (2000) Agri-environmental indicators for sustainable agriculture in Europe. European Centre for Nature Conservation, Tilburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright IA et al (1999) A protocol for building the ELPEN livestock policy decision support system. MLURI, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

Web Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Bottero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bottero, M. (2011). Assessing the Economic Aspects of Landscape. In: Cassatella, C., Peano, A. (eds) Landscape Indicators. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0366-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics