Skip to main content

Performance of Ocean Forecasting Systems—Intercomparison Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operational Oceanography in the 21st Century

Abstract

Ocean modelling, and more recently, ocean reanalysis or ocean forecasting system perform scientific assessment in order to evaluate errors and accuracy, but also to identify main drawbacks and possible improvements. Intercomparison has been a way to achieve such assessment among several numerical experiments. It is also a more robust approach for ocean state and forecast estimations. An historical overview of ocean model validation bringing to intercomparison activities is proposed here. Intercomparison projects performed over the last two decades by the oceanographic modelling community are presented and discussed here, in terms of objectives, and methodologies. Specific aspects for model, reanalysis, or ocean forecast experiment intercomparison are then detailed. Finally a particular focus is made on intercomparison studies performed in the framework of GODAE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hindcast refers in the assimilation oceanographic community to ocean estimates obtained with an assimilated run where all observations are available, usually in delayed mode and numerical simulations performed over a past period.

  2. 2.

    Nowcast refers in the assimilation oceanographic community to ocean estimates obtained with an assimilated run in real time or near-real time where all possible observations are not yet available. This is the nominal “past estimates” that are provided by operational system over the previous days before the forecast.

  3. 3.

    Performance has the same meaning than the title of this chapter, and is considered here in terms of usefulness and efficiency for users of ocean products provided by the OFS. In the framework of operational oceanography validation, a more specific definition is given later in this lecture notes.

  4. 4.

    Robustness (the quality of being able to withstand stresses, pressures, or changes in procedure or circumstance) is considered here in terms of OFS capacity to provide a consistent behavior and results under similar circumstances.

  5. 5.

    Accuracy is considered here as the degree of closeness of ocean estimates provided by the OFS to its actual true value. In the framework of operational oceanography validation, a more specific definition is given later in this lecture notes.

  6. 6.

    Reliability is considered here as the ability of the OFS to perform its required functions and provide ocean estimates under stated conditions while it is routinely operated.

  7. 7.

    GCM: Global Circulation Model.

  8. 8.

    European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.

  9. 9.

    United States National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

  10. 10.

    Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set.

  11. 11.

    RMS: root mean square.

  12. 12.

    This OceanObs’09 community white paper is available at http://www.oceanobs09.net/cwp/index.php.

  13. 13.

    Global Synthesis and Observations Panel, (http://www.clivar.org/organization/gsop/synthesis/synthesis.php).

  14. 14.

    The RAPID array uses standard observational techniques—moored instruments that measure conductivity, temperature and pressure, as well as bottom pressure recorders—to measure density and pressure gradients across the North Atlantic, from which one can readily calculate the basin overturning circulation and heat transport.

  15. 15.

    In the framework of assimilation the background is the state of the ocean model prior any correction by the assimilation method.

  16. 16.

    Here in the assimilation framework, the analysis is the production of an accurate image of the true state of the ocean at a given time, represented in a model as a collection of numbers. An analysis can be useful in itself as a comprehensive and self-consistent diagnostic of the ocean. It can also be used as input data to another operation, notably as the initial state for a numerical ocean forecast, or as a data retrieval to be used as a pseudo-observation.

  17. 17.

    The innovation is the discrepancies between observations and ocean model state, that is the vector of departures at the observation points.

  18. 18.

    Short-term ocean prediction: between 5 days and 2 weeks.

  19. 19.

    See footnote 16.

  20. 20.

    See footnote 15.

  21. 21.

    See footnote 16.

  22. 22.

    See Ocean & Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility at http://www.osi-saf.org/.

  23. 23.

    See http://www.aviso.oceanobs.com/.

  24. 24.

    Acoustic Dopler Current Profiler.

  25. 25.

    See footnote 23.

  26. 26.

    See footnote 22.

References

  • Antonov JI, Locarnini RA, Boyer TP, Mishonov AV, Garcia HE (2006) World ocean atlas 2005. In: Levitus S (ed) Salinity, vol 2. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmaseda MA, Alves O, Arribas A, Awaji T, Behringer DW, Ferry N, Fujii Y, Lee T, Rienecker M, Rosati A, Stammer D (2009) Ocean initialization for seasonal forecasts. Oceanogr Mag 22:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnier B, Reynaud T, Beckmann A, Böning CW, Molines J-M, Barnard S, Jia Y (2001) On the seasonal variability and eddies in the North Brazil current: insights from model intercomparison experiments. Progr Oceanogr 48:195–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell MJ, Lefebvre M, Le Traon P-Y, Smith N, Wilmer-Becker K (2009) GODAE, the global ocean data experiment. Oceanogr Mag 22:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom SC, Takacs LL, da Silva AM, Ledvina D (1996) Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates. Mon Weather Rev 124:1256–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blower JD, Blanc F, Cornillon P, Hankin SC, Loubrieu T (2008) Underpinning technologies for oceanography data sharing, visualization and analysis: review and future outlook. Final GODAE Symposium 2008: the revolution in global ocean forecasting GODAE: 10 years of achievement. Nice, France, GODAE, pp 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Böning CW, Bryan FO (1996) Large-scale transport processes in high-resolution circulation models. In: Krauss W (ed) The warmwatersphere of the North Atlantic Ocean. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, pp 91–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Böning CW, Dieterich C, Barnier B, Yanli J (2001) Seasonal cycle of meridional heat transport in the subtropical North Atlantic: a model intercomparison in relation to observations near 25°N. Progr Oceanogr 48:231–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasseur P (2006) Ocean data assimilation using sequential methods based on Kalman filter. In: Chassignet EP, Verron J (eds) GODAE Summer school in ocean weather forecasting: an integrated view of oceanography. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 371–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark C, Wilson S, Benveniste J, Bonekamp H, Drinkwater MR, Fellous J-L, Gohil BS, Lindstrom E, Mingsen L, Nakagawa K, Parisot F, Roemmich D, Johnson M, Meldrum D, Ball G, Merrifield M, McPhaden MJ, Freeland HJ, Goni GJ, Weller P, Send U, Hood M (2009) An overview of observing system relevant to GODAE. Oceanogr Mag 22:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnier L, Le Provost C (2007) Inter-comparing five forecast operational systems in the North Atlantic and Mediterranean basins: the MERSEA-strand1 methodology. J Mar Syst 65:354–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosnier L, Le Provost C, MERSEA Strand1 team (2006) Internal metrics definition for operational forecast systems inter-comparison: examples in the North Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. In: Chassignet EP, Verron J (eds) GODAE summer school in ocean weather forecasting: an integrated view of oceanography. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 455–465

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SA, Kanzow T, Rayner D, Baringer MO, Johns WE, Marotzke J, Longworth HR, Grant EM, Hirschi J, Beal LM, Meinen CS, Bryden HL (2007) Temporal variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation at 26.5°N. Science 317:935–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings JA, Bertino L, Brasseur P, Fukumori I, Kamachi M, Martin MJ, Mogensen KS, Oke PR,Testut C-E, Verron J, Weaver A (2009) Description of assimilation methods used in GODAE systems. Oceanogr Mag 22:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mey P, Craig P, Davidson F, Edwards CA, Ishikawa Y, Kindle JC, Proctor R, Thompson KR, Zhu J, GODAE Coastal and Shelf Seas Working Group (2009) Application in coastal modelling and forecasting. Oceanogr Mag 22:198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky E, Bertino L, Brassington GB, Chassignet EP, Davidson F, Hurlburt HE, Kamachi M, Lee T, Martin MJ, Mei S, Tonani M (2009) GODAE systems in operation. Oceanogr Mag 22:80–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donlon CJ, Casey KS, Robinson IS, Gentemann CL, Reynolds RW, Barton I, Arino O, Stark JD, Rayner NA, Le Borgne P, Poulter D, Vazquez-Cuervo J, Beggs H, Jones LD, Minnett P (2009) The GODAE high resolution sea surface temperature pilot project (GHRSST). Oceanogr Mag 22:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganachaud A, Wunsch C (2000) Improved estimates of global ocean circulation, heat transport and mixing from hydrographic data. Nature 408:453–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates WL (1992) AMIP: the atmospheric model intercomparison project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 73:1962–1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffies SM, Adcroft A, Banks H, Böning CW, Chassignet EP, Danabasoglu G, Danilov S, Deleersnijder E, Drange H, England M, Fox-Kemper B, Gerdes R, Gnanadesikan A, Greatbatch RJ, Hallberg RW, Hanert E, Harrison MJ, Legg SA, Little CM, Madec G, Marsland S, Nikurashin M, Pirani A, Simmons HL, Schröter J, Samuels BL, Treguier A-M, Toggweiler JR, Tsujino H, Vallis GK, and White L (2009) Problems and prospects in large-scale ocean circulation models. In: Fischer AS (ed) OceanOb’s 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett B, Comerma E, Daniel P, Ichikawa H (2009) Marine oil pollution predication. Oceanogr Mag 22:168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimbach P, Forget G, Ponte RM, Wunsch C, Balmaseda MA, Awaji T, Baehr J, Behringer D, Carton JA, Ferry N, Fischer AS, Fukumori I, Giese BS, Haines K, Harrison E, Hernandez F, Kamachi M, Keppenne C, Köhl A, Lee T, Menemenlis D, Oke PR, Remy E, Rienecker M, Rosati A, Smith DE, Speer KG, Stammer D, Weaver A (2009) Observational requirements for global-scale ocean climate analysis: lessons from ocean state estimation. In: Fischer AS (ed) OceanOb’s 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez F, Bertino L, Brassington GB, Cummings JA, Crosnier L, Davidson F, Hacker P, Kamachi M, Lisæter KA, Mahdon R, Martin MJ, Ratsimandresy A (2008) Validation and intercomparison of analysis and forecast products. Final GODAE Symposium 2008: the revolution in global ocean forecasting GODAE: 10 years of achievement. Nice, France, GODAE, pp 147–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez F, Bertino L, Brassington GB, Chassignet EP, Cummings JA, Davidson F, Drévillon M, Garric G, Kamachi M, Lellouche J-M, Mahdon R, Martin MJ, Ratsimandresy A, Regnier C (2009) Validation and intercomparison studies within GODAE. Oceanogr Mag 22:128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt HE, Brassington GB, Drillet Y, Kamachi M, Benkiran M, R. Bourdallé-Badie, Chassignet EP, Jacobs GA, Le Galloudec O, Lellouche J-M, Metzger EJ, Oke PR, Pugh TF, Schiller A, Smedstad OM, Tranchant B, Tsujino H, Usuii N, Wallcraft AJ (2009) High resolution global and basin-scale ocean analysis and forecasts. Oceanogr Mag 22:110–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larnicol G, Guinehut S, Rio M-H, Drévillon M, Faugère Y, Nicolas G (2006) The global observed ocean products of the french mercator project. International Symposium on Radar Altimetry: 15 years of altimetry, ESA/CNES

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Awaji T, Balmaseda MA, Greiner E, Stammer D (2009a) Ocean state estimation for climate research. Oceanogr Mag 22:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Stammer D, Awaji T, Balmaseda MA, Behringer D, Carton JA, Ferry N, Fischer AS, Fukumori I, Giese BS, Haines K, Harrison E, Heimbach P, Kamachi M, Keppenne C, Köhl A, Masina S, Menemenlis D, Ponte RM, Remy E, Rienecker M, Rosati A, Schröter J, Smith DE, Weaver A, Wunsch C, Xue Y (2009b) Ocean state estimate from climate research. In: Fischer AS (ed) OceanOb’s 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Locarnini RA, Mishonov AV, Antonov JI, Boyer TP, Garcia HE (2006) World ocean atlas 2005. In: Levitus S (ed) Temperature, vol 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin M (2011) Ocean forecasting systems: product evaluation and skill. In: Schiller A, Brassington GB (eds) Operational oceanography in the 21st century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 611–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Meincke J, Le Provost C, Willebrand J (2001) DYNAMO. Progr Oceanogr 48:121–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New AL, Barnard S, Herrmann P, Molines J-M (2001a) On the origin and pathway of the saline inflow to the Nordic Seas: insights from models. Progr Oceanogr 48:255–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New AL, Jia Y, Coulibaly M, Dengg J (2001b) On the role of the Azores current in the ventilation of the North Atlantic Ocean. Progr Oceanogr 48:163–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roemmich D, Argo-Science-Team (2009) Argo: the challenge of continuing 10 years of progress. Oceanogr Mag 22:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stammer D, Böning CW, Dieterich C (2001) The role of variable wind forcing in generating eddy energy in the North Atlantic. Progr Oceanogr 48:289–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stammer D, Köhl A, Awaji T, Balmaseda MA, Behringer D, Carton JA, Ferry N, Fischer AS, Fukumori I, Giese BS, Haines K, Harrison E, Heimbach P, Kamachi M, Keppenne C, Lee T, Masina S, Menemenlis D, Ponte RM, Remy E, Rienecker M, Rosati A, Schröter J, Smith DE, Weaver A, Wunsch C, Xue Y (2009) Ocean information provided through ensemble ocean syntheses. In: Fischer AS (ed) Oceanob’s 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Willebrand J, Barnier B, Böning CW, Dieterich C, Killworth PD, Le Provost C, Jia Y, Molines J-M, New AL (2001) Circulation characteristics in three eddy-permitting models of the North Atlantic. Progr Oceanogr 48:123–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrice Hernandez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hernandez, F. (2011). Performance of Ocean Forecasting Systems—Intercomparison Projects. In: Schiller, A., Brassington, G. (eds) Operational Oceanography in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0332-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics