Skip to main content

Introduction to Ocean Data Assimilation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operational Oceanography in the 21st Century

Abstract

Data assimilation is the process of hindcasting, now-casting, and forecasting using information from both observations and ocean dynamics. Modern ocean forecasting systems rely on data assimilation to estimate initial and boundary data, to interpolate and smooth sparse or noisy observations, and to evaluate observing systems and dynamical models. Every data assimilation system implements an optimality criterion which defines how to best combine dynamics and observations, given an hypothesized error model for both. The realization of practical ocean data assimilation systems is challenging due to both the technical issues of implementation, and the scientific issues of determining the appropriate set of hypothesized priors. This chapter reviews methodologies and highlights themes common to all approaches.

“Conventional ocean modeling consists of solving the model equations as accurately as possible, and then comparing the results with observations. While encouraging levels of quantitative agreement have been obtained, as a rule there is significant quantitative disagreement owing to many sources of error: model formulation, model inputs, computation and the data themselves. Computational errors aside, the errors made both in formulating the model and in specifying its inputs usually exceed the errors in the data. Thus it is unsatisfactory to have a model solution which is uninfluenced by the data.”—Bennett (Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p. 112, 1992)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambadan JT, Tang Y (2009) Sigma-point Kalman Filter data assimilation for strongly nonlinear systems. J Atmos Sci 66:261–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amodei L (1995) Solution approchee pour un probleme d’assimilation avec prise en compte l’erreur de modele. C R Acad Sci 321:1087–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J, Hoar T, Raeder K, Liu H, Collins N, Torn R, Avellano A (2009) The data assimilation research testbed: a community facility. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1283–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas R (1997) Atmospheric observations and experiments to assess their usefulness in data assimilation. J Meteorol Soc Japan 75:111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Meterolology (2009) Ocean analysis. http://www.bom.gov.au/oceainography/analysis.shtml

  • Baker NL, Daley R (2000) Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 126:1431–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmaseda MA, Vidard A, Anderson DL (2007) The ECMWF System 3 Ocean Analysis System, ECMWF Technical Memorandum. Technical Report 7. European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (1992) Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 346

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF (2002) Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 234

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Budgell W (1987) Ocean data assimilation and the Kalman filter: spatial regularity. J Phys Oceanogr 17:1583–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Thorburn MA (1992) The generalized inverse of a nonlinear quasigeostrophic ocean circulation model. J Phys Oceanogr 22:213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Chua BS, Ngodock H, Harrison DE, McPhaden MJ (2006) Generalized inversion of the Gent-Cane model of the Tropical Pacific with Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean (TAO) data. J Mar Res 64:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Chua BS, Pflaum BL, Erwig M, Fu Z, Loft RD, Muccino JC (2008) The inverse ocean modeling system. I: implementation. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 25:1608–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton F, Davis R, Fandry C (1976) A technique for objective analysis and design of oceanographic experiments applied to MODE-73. Deep Sea Res 23:559–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Broquet G, Edwards CA, Moore AM, Powell BS, Veneziani M, Doyle JD (2009) Application of 4D-variational data assimilation to the California Current system. Dyn Atmos Oceans 48:69–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cane M, Kaplan A, Miller R, Tang B, Hackert E, Busalacchi A (1996) Mapping Tropical Pacific sea level: data assimilation via a reduced state space Kalman filter. J Geophys Res 101:22599–22617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao Y, Li Z, Farrara J, Hung P (2009) Blending sea surface temperatures from multiple satellites and in situ observations for coastal oceans. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 26:1415–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapnik B, Desroziers G, Rabier F, Talagrand O (2006) Diagnosis and tuning of observational error in quasi-operational data assimilation setting. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 132:543–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua B, Bennett AF (2001) An inverse ocean modeling system. Ocean Modelling 3:137–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn SE, Da Silva A, Guo J, Sienkiewicz M, Lamich D (1998) Assessing the effects of data selection with the DAO physical-space statistical analysis system. Mon Wea Rev 126:2913–2926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtier P (1997) Dual formulation of four-dimensional assimilation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 123:2449–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtier P, Derber J, Errico R, Louis J, Vukicevic T (1993) Important literature on the use of adjoint, variational methods and the Kalman Filter in meteorology. Tellus 45A:342–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtier P, Thepaut J, Hollingsworth A (1994) A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 120:1367–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings J, Bertino L, Brasseur P, Fukumori I, Kamachi M, Martin MJ, Mogensen K, Oke P, Testut CE, Verron J, Weaver A (2009) Ocean data assimilation systems for GODAE. Oceanography 22:96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daescu DN, Navon IM (2008) A dual-weighted approach to order reduction in 4DVAR data assimilation. Mon Wea Rev 136:1026–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley R (1991) Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 457

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mey P, Craig P, Kindle J, Ishikawa Y, Proctor R, Thompson K, Zhu J (2007) Towards the assessment and demonstration of the value of GODAE results for coastal and shelf seas models and forecasting systems, 2nd edn. GODAE white paper. http://www.godae.org/modules/documents/documents/GODAE-CSSWG-paper-ed2.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2010

  • Dee DP, daSilva AM (1999) Maximum-likelihood estimation of forecast and observations error covariance parameters. Part I: methodology. Mon Wea Rev 127:1822–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desroziers G, Ivanov S (2001) Diagnosis and adaptive tuning of observation-error parameters in a variational assimilation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 127:1433–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky E, Bertino L, Brassington GB, Chassignet EP, Davidson F, Hurlburt HE, Kamachi M, Lee T, Martin MJ, Mei S, Tonani M (2009) GODAE systems in operation. Oceanography 22:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert GD, Bennett AF, Foreman M (1994) TOPEX/POSEIDON tides estimated using a global inverse model. J Geophys Res 99:24821–24852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen G (1997) Advanced data assimilation for strongly nonlinear dynamics. Mon Wea Rev 125:1342–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evensen G (2006) Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman Filter. Springer, Berlin, p 280

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelaro R, Zhu Y (2009) Examination of observation impacts derived from observing system experiments (OSEs) and adjoint models. Tellus 61A:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb A (ed) (1974) Applied Optimal Estimation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghil M (1989) Meteorological data assimilation for oceanographers. Part I: description and theoretical framework. Dyn Atmos Oceans 13:171–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giering R, Kaminski T (1998) Recipes for adjoint code construction. ACM Trans Math Software 24:437–474. http://autodiff.com

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard D (1989) A fast Monte-Carlo cross-validation procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data. Numer Math 56:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub G, Van Loan C (1989) Matrix Computations, 2nd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 642

    Google Scholar 

  • He R, Wilkin JL (2006) Tides on the Southeast New England shelf: a view from a hybrid data assimilative modeling approach. J Geophys Res 111:C08002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heemink AW, Mouthaan EE, Roest MR, Vollebregt EA, Robaczewska KB, Verlaan M (2002) Inverse 3D shallow water flow modeling of the continental shelf. Cont Shelf Res 22:465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RN, Ponte RM, Kostelich EJ, Blumberg A, Szunyogh I, Vinogradov SV, Henderson JM (2008) A simulation study using a local ensemble transform Kalman Filter for data assimilation in New York Harbor. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 25:1638–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann EE, Druon JN, Fennel K, Friedrichs M, Haidvogel D, Lee C, Mannino A, McClain C, Najjar R, Siewert J, O’Reilly J, Pollard D, Previdi M, Seitzinger S, Signorini S, Wilkin J (2008) Eastern U.S. continental shelf carbon budget: Integrating models, data assimilation, and analysis. Oceanography 21:86–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth A, Lonnberg P (1986) The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: the wind field. Tellus 38:111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF (1989) A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix for Laplacian smoothing splines. Comm Statist Simulation Comput 18:1059–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ide K, Courtier P, Ghil M, Lorenc AC (1997) Unified notation for data assimilation: operational, sequential and variational. J Meteorol Soc Japan 75:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory (2009) JPL ECCO Ocean Data Assimilation. http://ecco.jpl.nasa.gov/external/index.php.

  • Kalnay E (2003) Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation, and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 341

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurapov AL, Allen JS, Egbert GD, Miller RN, Kosro PM, Levine MD, Boyd T, Barth JA (2005) Assimilation of moored velocity data in a model of coastal wind-driven circulation off Oregon: multivariate capabilities. J Geophys Res 110:C10S08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardner RW, Al-Rabeh AH, Gunay N (1993) Optimal estimation of parameters for a two-dimensional hydrodynamical model of the Arabian Gulf. J Geophys Res 98:18229–18242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lermusiaux PF, Robinson AR (1999) Data assimilation via error subspace statistical estimation. Part I: theory and schemes. Mon Wea Rev 127:1385–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Chao Y, McWilliams J, Ide K (2008) A three-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme for the regional ocean modeling system. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 25:2074–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logutov OG, Lermusiaux PF (2008) Inverse barotropic tidal estimation for regional ocean applications. Ocean Model 25:17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenc A (1986) Analysis methods for numerical weather prediction. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 112:1177–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losch M, Wunsch C (2003) Bottom topography as a control variable in an ocean model. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 20:1685–1696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh P (1987) Systematic design of observational arrays. J Phys Oceanogr 17:885–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RN, Ghil M, Gauthiez F (1994) Advanced data assimilation in strongly nonlinear dynamical systems. J Atmos Sci 51:1037–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AM, Arango HG, Di Lorenzo E, Cornuelle BD, Miller AJ, Neilson DJ (2004) A comprehensive ocean prediction and analysis system based on the tangent linear and adjoint of a regional ocean model. Ocean Model 7:227–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AM, Arango HG, DiLorenzo E, Miller AJ, Cornuelle BD (2009) An adjoint sensitivity analysis of the Southern California Current circulation and ecosystem. J Phys Oceanogr 39:702–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourre B, De Mey P, Lyard F, Le Provost C (2004) Assimilation of sea level data over continental shelves: an ensemble method for the exploration of model errors due to uncertainties in bathymetry. Dyn Atmos Oceans 38:93–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muccino JC, Bennett AF, Hubele NF (2004) Significance testing for variational assimilation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 130:1815–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muccino JC, Arango H, Bennett AB, Chua BS, Cornuelle B, DiLorenzo E, Egbert GD, Hao L, Levin J, Moore AM, Zaron ED (2008) The inverse ocean modeling system. II: applications. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 25:1623–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Environmental Prediction (2009) Global ocean data assimilation system (GODAS). http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/GODAS

  • Navon I, Legler D (1987) Conjugate-gradient methods for large-scale minimization in meteorology. Mon Wea Rev 115:1479–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngodock HE, Smith SR, Jacobs GA (2009) Cycling the representer method with nonlinear models. In: Park SK, Xu L (eds) Data assimilation for atmospheric, oceanic, and hydrologic applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 321–340

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oke PR, Sakov P (2008) Representativeness error of oceanic observations for data assimilation. J Atmos Oceanic Technol 25:1004–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke PR, Allen JS, Miller RN, Egbert GD, Kosro PM (2002) Assimilation of surface velocity data into a primitive equation coastal ocean model. J Geophys Res 107:3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paduan JD, Shulman I (2004) HF radar data assimilation in the Monterey Bay area. J Geophys Res 109. doi:10.1029/2003JC001949

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell BS, Arango HG, Moore AM, DiLorenzo E, Milliff RF, Foley D (2008) 4DVAR data assimilation in the Intra-American Sea with the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). Ocean Mod 23:130–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell BS, Moore AM, Arango HG, DiLorenzo E, Milliff RF, Leben RR (2009) Near realtime ocean circulation assimilation and prediction in the Intra-American Sea with ROMS. Dyn Atmos Oceans 48:16–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser RJ, Wu W-S, Parrish DF, Roberts NM (2003a) Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: spatially homogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon Wea Rev 131:1524–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser RJ, Wu W-S, Parrish DF, Roberts NM (2003b) Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part II: spatially inhomogeneous and anisotropic general covariances. Mon Wea Rev 131:1536–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabier F, Jarvinen H, Klinker E, Mahfouf JF, Simmons A (2000) The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. I: experimental results with simplified physics. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 126:1143–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman JG, Miller RN, Spitz YH (2005) Error estimates for assimilation of satellite sea surface temperature data in ocean climate models. Geophys Res Lett 32:L18608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (2005) A First Course in Probability, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart LM, Dance SL, Nichols NK (2008) Correlated observation errors in data assimilation. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 56:1521–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong GM (2007) Udana. Forgotten Books, New York, pp 68–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Szunyogh I, Kostelich EJ, Gyarmati G, Kalnay E, Hunt BR, Ott E, SatterïňĄeld E, Yorke JA (2008) A local ensemble transform Kalman filter data assimilation system for the NCEP global model. Tellus A 60:113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Talagrand O (1997) Assimilation of observations, an introduction. J Meteorol Soc Japan 75:191–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Talagrand O (1999) A posterior verification of analysis and assimilation algorithms. Proceedings of a Workshop on Diagnosis of Data Assimilation Systems. ECMWF, Reading, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Talagrand O, Courtier P (1987) Variational assimilation of meteorological observations with the adjoint vorticity equation I, theory. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 113:1311–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todling R, Cohn SE (1994) Suboptimal schemes for atmospheric data assimilation based on the Kalman filter. Mon Wea Rev 122:2530–2557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Maryland (2009) Simple Ocean Data Assimilation (soda). http://www.atmos.umd.edu/~ocean/

  • Utke J, Hascoet L, Heimbach P, Hill C, Hovland P, Naumann U (2009) Toward adjoinable MPI. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Scientific and Engineering, PDSEC-09. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/IPDPS.2009.5161165

  • Wahba G (1990) Spline models for observational data. SIAM publications, Philadelphia, p 169

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba G, Johnson DR, Gao F, Gong J (1995) Adaptive tuning of numerical weather prediction models: randomized GCV in three- and four-dimensional data assimilation. Mon Wea Rev 123:3358–3369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver A, Courtier P (2001) Correlation modelling on the sphere using a generalized diffusion equation. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc 127:1815–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch C (1996) The Ocean Circulation Inverse Problem. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zaron ED (2006) A comparison of data assimilation methods using a planetary geostrophic model. Mon Wea Rev 134:1316–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Harrison MJ, Rosati A, Wittenberg A (2007) System design and evaluation of coupled ensemble data assimilation for global oceanic climate studies. Mon Wea Rev 135:3541–3564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou X, Navon IM, Berger M, Phua KH, Schlick T, LeDimet FX (1993) Numerical experience with limited-memory, quasi-newton methods for large-scale unconstrained nonlinear minimization. SIAM J Optimization 3:582–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Partial support for this work was provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation, award OCE-0623540, and the Naval Research Laboratory, award N00173-08-C015. Additional support from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to attend the GODAE/BlueLink Summer School is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward D. Zaron .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Software and WWW Resources

The Inverse Ocean Model (IOM) is a software toolkit designed to produce a custom variational data assimilation system from basic modeling components provided by the user (Bennett et al. 2008). The software features a graphical user interface (GUI) which is used to select assimilation or analysis algorithms and monitor program execution. The IOM has been used successfully with parallel and serial codes, including structured and unstructured grid finite-differece models, and finite-element models (Muccino et al. 2008). The website, http://iom.asu.edu, contains pedagogical material as well as software.

Another software system, the Data Assimilation Research Testbed (DART), provides a framework for developing, testing, and distributing ensemble data assimilation methodologies (Anderson et al. 2009). The DART system uses algorithms which do not require adjoint codes, so it has been used by a relatively large number of researchers and educators.

The Tangent linear and Adjoint Model Compiler (TAMC) was developed by Giering and Kaminski (1998) as a source-to-source Fortran translator for the generation of tangent-linear and adjoint codes needed in variational data assimilation and sensitivity studies. The company, FastOpt, maintains an active presence in this field, and is a good source of information on latest developments and conferences (http://fastopt.com/).

Another source of information and software is the ACTS-Adjoint Compiler project, which has created OpenAD, a tool for automatic differentiation of C and Fortran code (http://ww.mcs. anl.gov/OpenAD/). A recent highlight of their work is the development of adjoint codes from models which use domain decomposition via the parallel MPI library (Utke et al. 2009).

A brief search for “data assimilation” on the web will uncover many course materials and tutorials on data assimilation. One notable source is the European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF), which publishes online an excellent series of lecture notes on data assimilation and the use of satellite data. See http://www.ecmwf.int/newsevents/training/rcourse\_notes/ for their Meteorological Training Course Lecture Notes.

Glossary

Analysis

The analysis is the end-point or result of a data assimilation. It is the best estimate of the true state of the ocean at a given time, or within a given time interval, and, ideally, it is accompanied by an estimate of its errors. If the analysis is retrospective, i.e., it is the best estimate of the oceanic state at some past time conditioned upon measurements both before and after the analysis time, it is called a “re-analysis.” Typically the analysis is presented as a set of uniformly gridded oceanic state variables (sea-surface height, current vectors, temperature, salinity, etc.), on the same discrete grid as the ocean model. The analysis may be the end result of a forecast system, or it may provide input for the computation of other diagnostics, such as the computation of transport across transects. Sometimes the analysis is compared with new observations to either verify the analysis or assess the quality of the new observations.

Analysis increment

The analysis increment is the difference between the analysis field and the background. Equivalently, the analysis increment is the correction to the background field which results in the optimal analysis.

Background

The background state, sometimes called the “first guess,” is the prediction of the oceanic state prior to the assimilation of data. In the absence of other information, a climatology or other dynamics-free estimate of the ocean may serve as the background.

Control variables

The control variables, sometimes simply called “the controls,” are the independent quantities to be estimated in the data assimilation. The dynamical model consists of a set of diagnostic or prognostic relations which relate the control variables to the state variables. There is not a unique partition between control variables and state variables, but the controls are generally regarded as inputs while the state is regarded as an output. For example, in the 4D-Var algorithm, the model’s initial conditions are regarded as the control variable; although, these same initial conditions and the resulting forecast may be regarded as state variables. In the Kalman Filter, the system noise is regarded as the control variable.

Data assimilation

Data assimilation is the systematic methodology of incorporating information from an observing system into a dynamical model in such a manner that an optimality criterion is satisfied. Optimality criteria typically express a maximum likelihood or minimum mean square error criterion. In practice, many data assimilation systems find analysis states which only approximately satisfy the stated optimality criterion. This is usually considered acceptable because the optimality criteria are based on error models which are themselves approximate.

Dynamical model

It is assumed that the state of the ocean is predicted or modeled by a set of dynamics, e.g., Newton’s Laws expressed in the usual formulations of continuum mechanics such as the Navier-Stokes equations or the shallow water equations. The dynamical model is assumed to be formulated as a mathematically well-posed initial-boundary-value problem.

Error model

An error model is a description of the probability distribution of some possibly multivariate or field quantity. For example, an error model for a measurement of temperature might minimally declare that the errors have zero mean (are unbiased), known variance, σ, and are Gaussian distributed. An error model for an observing system would minimally consist of error models for the individual observations. An error model for a set of dynamics would minimally consist of error sub-models for the initial conditions, boundary conditions, and other model inhomogeneities. Each of these sub-models would be characterized by its own space-time covariance structure, as appropriate.

Generalized inversion

Because the oceanic state is, in principle, uniquely determined by the ocean dynamics, the addition of observational data in data assimilation makes the oceanic state an over-determined quantity. Alternately, if we consider the measurement error and the dynamics errors to be unknown quantities, which ought to be determined by the data assimilation, the problem of identifying both the oceanic state together with the error fields is an under-determined problem. From this perspective, data assimilation may be regarded as a generalized inversion of the ocean model dynamics. The generalized inverse of the dynamical model consists of the analysis fields, as well as estimates of the error fields, the statistics of which were specified a priori by the error models. Bennett (1992, 2002) uses this language to describe data assimilation, thus highlighting a unifying theme of mathematical inverse theory, statistical estimation, control theory, and non-parametric estimation methods.

Innovation vector or residual vector

The innovation vector is the difference between the observation vector and an observation of the ocean state, written as y − Hx in the notation of this article. Sometimes the background innovations, y − Hx b, may be distinguished from the analysis innovations, y − Hx a.

Objective analysis

The technique of objective analysis—called optimal interpolation, statistical interpolation, and Gauss-Markov smoothing—was originally applied to create a set of consistently gridded fields from sparse observations (Bretherton et al. 1976). When a background field is present, the corrections applied to the background may be called analysis increments. The technique has a close relationship with multivariate smoothing splines (Wahba 1990; Bennett 1992).

Observing system

An observing system produces observations or measurements of some subset of variables characterizing the ocean. Observing systems are defined by a set of observation operators, also called measurement kernels, one per measurement, which mathematically represent the mapping from the oceanic state to a finite set of real values.

State variables

State variables are those fields or quantities which characterize the oceanic state to be estimated. More abstractly, state variables are elements in the domain of the observation operators.

State vector

A state vector is a finite-dimensional state variable. Even when the dynamics are represented by a set of partial differential equations, the computational implementation usually requires projection onto a finite-dimensional vector.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaron, E.D. (2011). Introduction to Ocean Data Assimilation. In: Schiller, A., Brassington, G. (eds) Operational Oceanography in the 21st Century. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0332-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics