Parameters of the Ionospheric F2 Layer as a Source of Information on Trends in Thermospheric Dynamics

  • Alexey D. DanilovEmail author
Part of the IAGA Special Sopron Book Series book series (IAGA, volume 2)


The problem of determination of trends in thermospheric dynamics parameters (horizontal winds) on the basis of analysis of trends in various combinations of ionospheric F2-layer parameters is formulated. The previous attempts of the author in this direction are briefly described. It is shown that all studied parameters lead to the same result: after the “boundary date” (approximately 1980) a systematic change in these parameters (a long-term trend) is observed, this fact manifesting changes in the dynamical regime of the thermosphere because of cooling and contraction of the entire middle and upper atmosphere. The results of a search for trends in the hmF2 height for the moment (Т(ss) + 2h) are described. These trends are found higher than the hmF2 trends obtained earlier by various authors analyzing the hmF2 behavior at fixed moments of local time.


Zonal Wind Boundary Date Geomagnetic Activity Meridional Wind Horizontal Wind 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 07-05-00095).


  1. Bremer J (1998) Trends in the ionospheric E and F regions over Europe. Ann Geophys 16:986–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bremer J (2006) Long-term trends in ionospheric E and F1 regions. Paper presented at the 4th workshop on long-term changes and trends in the atmosphere, Sodankyla (Finland), 2–8 September 2006Google Scholar
  3. Bremer J, Schminder R, Greisiger KM, Hoffmann P, Kurschner D, Singer W (1997) Solar cycle dependence and long-term trends in the wind field of the mesosphere/lower thermosphere. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 59:497–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Danilov AD (2002) Overview of the trends in the ionospheric E and F2 regions. Phys Chem Earth (C) 20:579–588Google Scholar
  5. Danilov AD (2006a) Progress in studies of the trends in the ionosphere F region. Phys Chem Earth (C) 31(1–3):34–40Google Scholar
  6. Danilov AD (2006b) Relation between daytime and night-time values of the critical frequency foF2. Int J Geomagn Aeron 6(3). doi: 10.1029/2005GI000129Google Scholar
  7. Danilov AD (2008a) Long-term trends in the relation between daytime and nighttime values of foF2. Ann Geophys 26(5):1199–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danilov AD (2008b) Time and spatial variations in the ratio of nighttime and daytime critical frequencies of the F2 layer. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 70(8–9):1201–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danilov AD (2009a) Critical frequencies foF2 as an indicator of trends in thermospheric dynamics. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 71(13):1430–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danilov AD (2009b) Time and spatial variations of the foF2(night)/foF2(day) values. Adv Space Res 43(11):1786–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danilov AD (2009c) Scatter of hmF2 values as an indicator of trends in thermospheric dynamics. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 71(14–15):1586–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danilov AD, Vanina-Dart LB (2007) Long-term trends in the ratio of daytime and nighttime values of foF2. Geomagn Aeron (in Russian) 47(2):236–241Google Scholar
  13. Danilov AD, Vanina-Dart LB (2009) Scatter of hmF2 values as an indicator of trends in thermospheric dynamics. Geomagn Aeron (in Russian) 49(1):58–62Google Scholar
  14. Danilov AD, Vanina-Dart LB (2010) Comparison of foF2 values in the daytime and after the sunset. Geomagn Aeron (in Russian) 50(1):61–66Google Scholar
  15. Emmert JT, Fejer BG, Fesen CD, Sheperd GG, Solheim BH (2001) Climatology of middle- and low-latitude daytime F-region disturbance in neutral wind measured by wind imaging interferometer (WINDII). J Geophys Res 106(24):701–712Google Scholar
  16. Jacobi Ch, Lange M, Kurschner D, Manson AH, Meek CE (2001) A long-term comparison of Saskatoon MF radar and Collm LFD mesosphere-lower thermosphere wind measurements. Phys Chem Earth 26:419–424Google Scholar
  17. Jacobi Ch, Portnyagin YuI, Merzlyakov EG, Solovjova TV, Makarov NA, Kurschner D (2005) A long-term comparison of mesopause region wind measurements over Eastern and Central Europe. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 67(3):229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laštovička J et al (2006) Long-term trends in foF2: a comparison of various methods. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 68(17):1854–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laštovička J et al (2008) Emerging pattern of global change in the upper atmosphere and ionosphere. Ann Geophys 26(5):1255–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marin D, Mikhailov AV, de la Morena BA, Herraiz M (2001) Long-term hmF2 trends in the Eurasian longitudinal sector on the ground-based ionospheric observations. Ann Geophys 19(7):761–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merzlyakov E, Jacobi Ch, Solovjova TV, Portnyagin YuI (2008) Structural changes in trends of MLT winds at middle and high latitudes. Paper presented at 5th IAGA/ICMA/CAWSES workshop “long-term changes and trends in the atmosphere”, St. Petersburg (Russia), 9–3 September, 2008Google Scholar
  22. Mikhailov AV (2006) Ionospheric long-term trends: if the geomagnetic control and the greenhouse hypotheses can be reconciled? Ann Geophys 24(10):2533–2541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Portnyagin YuI, Merzlyakov EG, Sokolova TV, Jacobi Ch, Kurschner D, Manson A, Meek C (2006) Long-term trends and year-to-year variability of midlatitude mesosphere/lower thermosphere winds. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 68(17):1890–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rishbeth H (1998) How the thermospheric circulation affects the ionospheric F2 layer. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys 60(14):1385–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shimazaki T (1995) World wide daily variations in the height of the maximum electron density in the ionospheric F2 layer. J Radio Res Labs (Jpn) 2(7):85–97Google Scholar
  26. Ulich T, Turunen E (1997) Evidence for long-term cooling of the upper atmosphere in ionospheric data. Geophys Res Lett 24(9):1103–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vanina LB, Danilov AD (2006) Relation between daytime and nighttime values of the F2-layer critical frequency. Geomagn Aeron (in Russian) 46(2):219–224Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Applied GeophysicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations