Advertisement

Supreme Court Sentences Retrieval Using Thai Law Ontology

  • Tanapon Tantisripreecha
  • Nuanwan SoonthornphisajEmail author
Chapter
  • 684 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 70)

Abstract

This paper presents an improvement of our approach called SCRO_II algorithm. SCRO_I algorithm was initially developed in order to retrieve a set of Supreme Court sentences. The goal of SCRO_I is to provide different law issues among those retrieved documents. We create a new ontology using different semantics to study their performances based on diversity measurement. The contribution of this new ontology is compared to the traditional one. A new procedure is embedded in SCRO_II algorithm to identify a set of synonyms and relations. The experiments were done on Thai Succession Law and Bill of Exchange Law. The experimental results show that SCRO_II outperforms SCRO_I algorithm in both data sets.

Keywords

Ontology Retrieval Supreme Court sentences Thai succession law 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partly supported by Faculty of Science and The Graduate School of Kasetsart University.

References

  1. 1.
    Tantisripreecha, T., Soonthornphisaj, N.: Query expansion algorithm for supreme court sentences retrieval using ontology. In: Proceedings of the 48th Kasetsart Annual Conference, pp. 43–50 (2009) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jovic, A., Prcela, M., Gamberger, D.: Ontologies in medical knowledge representation. In: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 535–540 (2007) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henze, N., Dolog, P., Nejdl, W.: Reasoning and ontologies for personalized e-learning in the semantic web. Educ. Technol. Soc. 7(4), 82–97 (2004) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tantisripreecha, T., Soonthornphisaj, N.: A study of Thai succession law ontology on supreme court sentences retrieval. In: Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2010, IMECS 2010, Hong Kong, 17–19 March 2010, pp. 146–151 (2010) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valente, A., Breuker, J.: Making ends meet: conceptual models and ontologies in legal problem solving. In: Proceedings of the XI Brazilian AI Symposium, pp. 1–15 (1994) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hohfeld, W.: Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Legal Reasoning. Yale University Press, London (2008) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benjamins, V.R., Contreras, J., Casanovas, P., Ayuso, M., Becue, M., Lemus, L., Urios, C.: Ontologies of professional legal knowledge as the basic for intelligent IT support for judges. In: Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 359–378 (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kayed, A.: Building e-laws ontology: new approach. In: OTM Workshops, pp. 826–835 (2005) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guiraude, L., Sylvie, D.: Updating ontology in the legal domain. In: Proceedings of the 10th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law (2005) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saravanan, M., Ravindran, B., Raman, S.: Improving Legal Information Retrieval Using an Ontological Framework. Springer Science Business Media B.V., Berlin (2009) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soonhee, H., Youngim, J., Aesun, Y., Kwon, H.C.: Building Korean classifier ontology based on Korean WordNet, pp. 261–268 (2006) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanapon Tantisripreecha
    • 1
  • Nuanwan Soonthornphisaj
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceFaculty of Science Kasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceFaculty of Science Kasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations