Skip to main content

Quality assessment of Dynamic Finite Difference schemes on the Taylor-Green Vortex

  • Conference paper
Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II

Part of the book series: ERCOFTAC Series ((ERCO,volume 16))

Abstract

The performance of a class of explicit and implicit dynamic finite difference schemes (Fauconnier et al. J. Comput. Phys., 228(6):1830–1861 (2009), J. Comput. Phys., Accepted (2009)) is investigated for the Large-Eddy Simulation of the three-dimensional Taylor-Green Vortex flow (Brachet et al. (1983)), in which the dynamic Smagorinsky model and the small-small multiscale Smagorinsky model are used. The numerical errors and the modeling errors and their interactions are investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.E. Brachet, D.I. Meiron, S.A. Orszag, B.G. Nickel, R.H. Morf, and U. Frisch. Small-scale structure of the Taylor-Green Vortex. J. Fluid. Mech., 130:411–452, 1983.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Fauconnier, C. De Langhe, and E. Dick. Construction of Implicit Dynamic Finite Difference Schemes and Application to the Large-Eddy Simulation of the Taylor-Green Vortex. J. Comput. Phys., 2009, Accepted.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Fauconnier, C. De Langhe, and E. Dick. A family of dynamic finite difference schemes for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys., 228(6):1830–1861, 2009.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Meyers, B. Geurts, and M. Baelmans. Database analysis of errors in large-eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids, 15(9):2740–2755, 2003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Meyers, B. Geurts, and M. Baelmans. Optimality of the dynamic procedure for large-eddy simulations. Phys. Fluids, 17(4):045–108, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. K. W. Tam and J. C. Webb. Dispersion-Relation Preserving Finite Difference Schemes for Computational Acoustics. J. Comp. Phys., 107:262–281, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten. Comparison of numerical schemes in large-eddy simulations of the temporal mixing layer. Int. J. Num. Methods in Fluids, 22:297–311, 1996.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dieter Fauconnier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fauconnier, D., De Langhe, C., Dick, E. (2011). Quality assessment of Dynamic Finite Difference schemes on the Taylor-Green Vortex. In: Salvetti, M., Geurts, B., Meyers, J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II. ERCOFTAC Series, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0231-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics