Skip to main content

Evaluating Subgrid-Scale Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Katabatic Flow

  • Conference paper
Book cover Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II

Part of the book series: ERCOFTAC Series ((ERCO,volume 16))

Abstract

The performance of commonly used subgrid-scale (SGS) models is evaluated for large-eddy simulation (LES) of turbulent katabatic flow. The very stable stratification and strong low-level shear in this flow provide a stringent test for SGS models. Using an a posteriori testing procedure, the SGS models’ performance in reproducing turbulence statistics and spectra in katabatic flow is investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mason PJ (1994) Bound-Layer Meteor 120:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahrt L (1998) Theoret Comput Fluid Dyn 11:263–279

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beare RJ, MacVean MK, Holtslag AAM, Cuxart J, Esau I, Golaz JC, Jiménez MA, Khairoutdinov M, Kosović B, Lewellen D, Lund TS, Lundquist JK, McCabe A, Moene AF, Noh Y, Raasch S, and Sullivan P (2006) Bound-Layer Meteor 118:247–272

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Geurts B (2004) Elements of direct and large-eddy simulation. R. T. Edwards, Inc., Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vreman B, Geurts B, and Kuerten H (1997) J Fluid Mech 339:357–390

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Prandtl L (1942) Führer durch die Strömungslehre. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  7. Denby B (1999) Bound-Layer Meteor 92:67–100

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Schumann U (1990) Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 116:637–670

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Skyllingstad ED (2003) Bound-Layer Meteor 106:217–243

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro A and Fedorovich E (2004) Int J Heat and Mass Transfer 47:4911–4927

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Burkholder BA, Shapiro A, Fedorovich E (2009) Acta Geophysica (in press, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-009-0025-6)

  13. Fedorovich E and Shapiro A (2009) Acta Geophysica (in press, DOI: 10.2478/s11600-009-0027-4)

  14. Smagorinsky J (1963) Mon Wea Rev 91:99–164

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lilly DK (1967) Proc IBM Sci Computing Symp Environmental Sci 320-1951:195–210

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deardorff JW (1980) Bound-Layer Meteor 18:495–527

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Piomelli U and Chasnov JR (1996) Large-eddy simulations: theory and applications. In: Henningson D, Hallbäck, Alfreddson H, and Johansson A (eds) Transition and turbulence modelling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leslie DC and Quarini GL (1979) J Fluid Mech 91:65–91

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mason PJ and Thomson DJ (1992) J Fluid Mech 242:51–78

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown AR, Derbyshire SH, Mason PJ (1994) Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 120:1485–1512

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kosović B (1997) J Fluid Mech 336:151–182

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sullivan PP, McWilliams JC, Moeng C (1994) Bound-Layer Meteor 71:247–276

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Saiki EM, Moeng C, and Sullivan PP (2000) Bound-Layer Meteor 95:1–30

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot WH (1991) Phys Fluids A 7:1760–1771

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lilly DK (1992) Phys Fluids A 4:633–635

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stoll R and Porté-Agel F (2008) Bound-Layer Meteor 126:1–28

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange MB (2000) J Fluid Mech 415:261–284

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Porté-Agel (2004) Bound-Layer Meteor 112:81–105

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fedorovich E and Shapiro A (2009) J Fluid Mech (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaiser R and Fedorovich E (1998) J Atmo Sci 55:580–594

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan A. Burkholder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Burkholder, B.A., Fedorovich, E., Shapiro, A. (2011). Evaluating Subgrid-Scale Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Katabatic Flow. In: Salvetti, M., Geurts, B., Meyers, J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II. ERCOFTAC Series, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0231-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics