Skip to main content

A Posteriori Analysis of Numerical Errors in Computing Scalar Variance

  • Conference paper
Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II

Part of the book series: ERCOFTAC Series ((ERCO,volume 16))

  • 1479 Accesses

Abstract

The results of a novel procedure for a posteriori testing show that the predictions of a dynamic model for the subfilter variance are sensitive to accumulated errors in the evolution of the filtered scalar field as well as to numerical errors incurred in evaluating the variance model at a single time step. Tests were performed on homogeneous, isotropic filtered scalar fields simulated using exact and modified wavenumbers corresponding to second, fourth, and sixth order accurate finite difference schemes. The sixth order scheme showed close agreement with the spectral method in terms of the distribution of predicted subfilter variance values, which were assessed using nonparametric techniques. The second order scheme produced, on average, substantially higher values of subfilter variance. Valid methods for comparing models were sought that account for the variability of statistical estimates made from a spatially correlated sample, and some preliminary approaches were presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balarac G, Pitsch H, Raman V (2008) Phys Fluids 20:035114

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Besag J (1974) J Roy Stat Soc BMet 36:192-236

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferro CAT, Hannachi A, Stephenson DB (2005) J Climate 18:4344–4354

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaul CM, Raman V, Balarac G, Pitsch H (2009) Phys Fluids 21:055102

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaul CM, Raman V, Balarac G, Pitsch H (2009) Numerical errors in scalar variance models for large eddy simulation, Sixth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Seoul, Korea

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kravchenko AG, Moin P (1997) J Comput Phys 131:310-322

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moin P, Squires K, Cabot W, Lee S (1991) Phys Fluids A 3:2746-2757

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierce CD, Moin P (1998) Phys Fluids 10:3041-3044

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schabenberger O, Gotway CA (2005) Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen M. Kaul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaul, C.M., Raman, V., Balarac, G., Pitsch, H. (2011). A Posteriori Analysis of Numerical Errors in Computing Scalar Variance. In: Salvetti, M., Geurts, B., Meyers, J., Sagaut, P. (eds) Quality and Reliability of Large-Eddy Simulations II. ERCOFTAC Series, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0231-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics