Skip to main content

Ibn Sīnā and Conflict in Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy, Vintage Enthusiasms

Part of the book series: The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science ((WONS,volume 75))

Abstract

In autumn 1965 I became one of John Bell’s first students. He and I were both registered at Oxford University to work for MPhil—later upgraded to DPhil—under the supervision of John Crossley (though for reasons I don’t remember, I began as a supervisee of Michael Dummett). John Bell and Alan Slomson (another supervisee of John Crossley) had put together a clear and elegant first course on model theory, concentrating on ultraproducts and the construction of elementary embeddings one element at a time, in the style being pioneered at the time by Chang and Keisler. That course was my introduction to model theory. A fuller version, with some extra material from George Wilmers, became the famous Bell and Slomson: Models and Ultraproducts. It was published two years earlier than the definitive tome of Chang and Keisler, and made a lot of people happy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Ackrill, J. (1963). Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione, Translated with Notes and Glossary. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fārābī (1986). Commentary on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. Dar el-Machreq, Beirut. W. Kutsch and S. Marrow, eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammonius (1897). In Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius. Reimer, Berlin. Adolfus Busse, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (2003). Porphyry: Introduction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boole, G. (1997). The nature of logic (1848). In Grattan-Guinness, I. and Bornet, G., editors, George Boole: Selected Manuscripts on Logic and its Philosophy, pages 1–12. Birkhäuser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, W. (2000). “Philoponus” on Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.9–13 with Stephanus on Aristotle’s On Interpretation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1903/1906). Grundlagen der Geometrie. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematikervereinigung, 12/15:319–324, 368–375/ 293–309, 377–403, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutas, D. (1988). Avicenna and the Aristotelian Tradition: Introduction to Reading Avicenna’s Philosophical Works. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, W. (2009). Traditional logic, modern logic, and natural language. Journal of Philosophical Logic. Volume in honour of Johan van Benthem, edited by Hans von Ditmarsch and Larry Moss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn al-Ṭayyib (1975). Commentary on Porphyry’s Eisagoge. Dar el-Machreq, Beirut. Kwame Gyekye, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn Sīnā (1970). Al-c Ibāra. Dār al-Kātib al-c Arabī lil-Ṭabāc wal-Našr, Cairo. Ibrahim Madkour et al., eds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabre, F., editor (1999). Al-Naṣṣ al-Kāmil li-Manṭiq ’Arisṭū, volume 1. Dār al-Fikr al-Libnānī, Beirut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lameer, J. (1996). Review of “Glosses and commentaries etc., ed. Charles Burnett”. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 116:90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, P. (1996). Philosophy of Mathematics and Mathematical Practice in the Seventeenth Century. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G. (2007). Truthlikeness. Stanford Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. plato.stanford.edu/entries/truthlikeness/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proclus (1970). A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Glenn R. Morrow, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, P. (1981). The Syllogism. Philosophia Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, P. (2003). Medieval Modal Systems. Ashgate, Gateshead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, C. (1996). Aristotle’s De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaḥyā ibn c Adī (1988). Maqālāt Yaḥyā ibn c Adī al-Falsafiyya. Amman. Sahban Khalifat, ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, F. W. (1981). Al-Farabi’s Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione. British Academy and Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfrid Hodges FBA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hodges, W. (2011). Ibn Sīnā and Conflict in Logic. In: DeVidi, D., Hallett, M., Clarke, P. (eds) Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy, Vintage Enthusiasms. The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, vol 75. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0214-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics