Organoactinide Chemistry: Synthesis and Characterization

Abstract

The advent of modern organometallic chemistry has often been cited as the report of the preparation of ferrocene, (Z5–C5H5)2Fe, the first metallic complex containing a p–complexed ligand (Pauson, 1951). It was not long after the report of this compound that comparable analogs of the lanthanides and actinides were reported (Reynolds and Wilkinson, 1956). Since that time, the organometallic chemistry of the actinides has lagged in comparable developments to the chemistry of the transition metals. Recent years, however, have witnessed a resurgence of interest in the non-aqueous chemistry of the actinides, in part due to the availability of a much wider array of ancillary ligands capable of stabilizing new compounds and introducing new types of reactivity. Equally important in stimulating new interest has been the realization by numerous researchers that the organometallic chemistry of these elements provides types of chemical environments that effectively probe the metals’ ability to employ valence 6d and 5f orbitals in chemical bonding. Modern organoactinide chemistry is nowcharacterized by the existence not only of actinide analogs to many classes of d–transition metal complexes (particularly those of Groups 3 and 4), but increasingly common reports of compounds (and types of reactions) unique to the actinide series. Most developments in the non-aqueous chemistry of the actinides have involved the use of thorium and uranium, both due to their lower specific activity, and to the apparent chemical similarity these elements bear to Group 4 metals in organometallic transformations. Uranium has further demonstrated the ability to access a wide range of oxidation states (3+ to 6+) in organic solvents, providing for greater flexibility in effecting chemical transformations.