Skip to main content

Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) from a Global Dataset: The PEER NGA Equations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 14))

Abstract

The PEER NGA ground-motion prediction equation s (GMPEs) were derived by five developer teams over several years, resulting in five sets of GMPEs. The teams used various subsets of a global database of ground motions and metadata from shallow earthquakes in tectonically active regions in the development of the equations. Since their publication, the predicted motions from these GMPEs have been compared with data from various parts of the world – data that largely were not used in the development of the GMPEs. The comparisons suggest that the NGA GMPEs are applicable globally for shallow earthquakes in tectonically active regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrahamson N, Atkinson G, Boore D, Bozorgnia Y, Campbell K, Chiou B, Idriss IM, Silva W, Youngs R (2008) Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations. Earthquake Spectra 24:45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2006) Relationships between median values and between aleatory variabilities for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1512–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bindi D, Luzi L, Massa M, Pacor F (2010) Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian accelerometric archive (ITACA). Bull Earthquake Eng 8: 1209–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2007). Boore-Atkinson NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, PEER Report 2007/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 234 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boore DM, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA (2006) Orientation-independent measures of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1502–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell K, Abrahamson N, Power M, Chiou B, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2009). Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project: empirical ground motion prediction equations for active tectonic regions, Sixth International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, March 3–4, 2009, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan (available from http://www.cuee.titech.ac.jp/Japanese/Publications/Doc/conference_6th.pdf)

  7. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2007). Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters, PEER Report 2007/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 238 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W (2008) NGA project strong-motion database. Earthquake Spectra 24:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang Y-N, Whittaker AS, Luco N (2008) Maximum spectral demands in the near-fault region. Earthquake Spectra 24:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthquake Spectra 24:3–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scasserra G, Stewart JP, Bazzurro P, Lanzo G, Mollaioli F (2009) A comparison of NGA ground-motion prediction equations to Italian data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2961–2978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shoja-Taheri J, Naserieh S, Ghofrani H (2010) A test of the applicability of NGA models to the strong ground-motion data in the Iranian plateau. J Earthquake Eng 14:278–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stafford PJ, Strasser FO, Bommer JJ (2008) An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region. Bull Earthquake Eng 6:149–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Watson-Lamprey JA, Boore DM (2007) Beyond SaGMRotI: conversion to Sa Arb , Sa SN , and Sa MaxRot . Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1511–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Jon Stewart for providing the data used to construct Fig. 1.12, Sinan Akkar and Erol Kalkan for reviews of the paper, and Ken Campbell and Yousef Bozorgnia for material that helped in preparing this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D.M. Boore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boore, D. (2011). Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs) from a Global Dataset: The PEER NGA Equations. In: Akkar, S., Gülkan, P., van Eck, T. (eds) Earthquake Data in Engineering Seismology. Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0152-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics