Principles and Practices of Neurath’s Picture Language

  • Ahti-Veikko PietarinenEmail author
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 18)


Otto Neurath (1882–1945) might never have been the pet philosopher of the logical empiricists’ influential movement. For instance, he appears never to have assumed any distinctively genial and agreeable position in the mainstreams of the movement.


Information Visualisation Logical Empiricist Normal Language Diagrammatic Logic Iconic Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Supported by the University of Helsinki Excellence in Research Grant (2006–2008) and the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation (2009).


  1. Hartmann, F., Bauer, E. K. (2006). Bildersprache: Otto Neurath, Visualisierungen. Wien: Facultas. wuv Universitäts.Google Scholar
  2. Hintikka, J. (1992). Carnap’s work in the foundations of logic and mathematics in a historical perspective, Synthese 93, 167–189. Reprinted in Hintikka (1997, 191–213).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hintikka, J. (1997). Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator: An Ultimate Presupposition of Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Kamp, H., Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Lee, C. (2008). Semantics and Cognitive Science, manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Lupton, E. (1986). Reading isotype, Design Issues 3, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nemeth, E., Stadler, F. (eds.) (1996). Encyclopedia and Utopia: The life and work of Otto Neurath (1882–1945). Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Neurath, O. (1921). Anti-Spengler. München: Georg D. W. Callwey (Abridged translation appears in Neurath 1973).Google Scholar
  9. Neurath, O. (1936). International Picture Language: The First Rules of ISOTYPE. London: Kegan Paul. Reprinted, with a German translation by Marie Neurath, by University of Reading Department of Typography & Graphic Communication, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Neurath, O. (1937). Basic by Isotype. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  11. Neurath, O. (1944). Foundations of the Social Sciences, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. II, No. 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted in Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Charles Morris (eds.). Foundations of the Unity of Science: Toward an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume II, 1–52, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Neurath, O. (1973). M., Cohen, R. S. (eds), In Neurath, Empiricism and Sociology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Neurath, M., Kinross, R. (2008). The Transformer: Principles of Making Isotype Charts. London: Hyphen Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nyíri, K. (2003). From texts to pictures: The new unity of science. In Nyíri, K. (ed), Mobile Learning: Essays on Philosophy, Psychology and Education, 45–79. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Odum, H. T. (1994). Ecological and General Systems: An Introduction to Systems Ecology. Boulder, CO: Colorado University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). C., Weiss, P., Burks, A. W. (eds), In Hartshorne, The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2006). Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games, and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2007). The semantics/pragmatics distinction from the game-theoretic point of view. In Pietarinen, A.-V. (ed.), Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, pp. 229–242. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  19. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2008a). Diagrammatic logic of existential graphs: A case study of commands. In Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5223, 404–407. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2008b). An iconic Logic of Metaphors, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Cognitive Science, Yonsei University: The Korean Society for Cognitive Science, 317–320.Google Scholar
  21. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2010a). Peirce and the logic of image, Semiotica in press.Google Scholar
  22. Pietarinen, A.-V. (2010b). Is non-visual diagrammatic logic possible? How? In Gerner, A. (ed), Diagrammatology and Diagram Praxis. London: College Publications. in press.Google Scholar
  23. Sandu, G., Hintikka, J. (2001). Aspects of compositionality, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, J. M., Szathmáry, E. (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Twyman, M. (1975). Graphic Communication Through ISOTYPE. University of Reading: Department of Typography & Graphic Communication.Google Scholar
  26. van Heijernoort, J. (1967). Logic and calculus and logic as language, Synthese 17, 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. von Engelhardt, J. (2002). The Language of Graphics: A Framework for the Analysis of Syntax and Meaning in Maps, Charts and Diagrams, ILLC Dissertations. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  28. Vossoughian, N. (2008). Otto Neurath: The Language of the Global Polis. Den Haag: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations