Skip to main content

Neurath and the Encyclopaedic Project of Unity of Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 18))

Abstract

Underlying the arguments I will try to put forward, there is a claim and a hypothesis. My claim: Neurath’s encyclopaedism deserves to be though out as an important and specific program inside neopositivism. We know that neopositivist program for unity of science was not homogeneous, that there are three slightly yet important perspectives needing to be though out in its specific difference: Carnap corresponding to the logical development, Morris to the more pragmatic tendency, and Neurath performing the encyclopaedic trend. My hypothesis: Neurath’s encyclopaedism is of great significance for the formulation of a contemporary conception of unity of science. A statement which assumes that nowadays encyclopaedia becomes more and more the very model of science and thus that our actuality is giving reason to Neurath.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, M. (dir.) (1974a). The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th ed, 30 vols. Chicago/London/Toronto/Genève/Sydney/Tokyo/Manila/Seoul: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, M. J. (1973–1974b). The circle of learning. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th ed, Propaedia, pp. 5–7. Chicago, IL/London/Toronto, ON/Genève/Sydney/Tokyo/Manila/Seoul: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsted, J. H. (1630). Encyclopaedia Omnium Scientiarum septem tomis distincta. Stuttgart: Frieddrich Fromman Verlag (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F. (1620). Instauratio magna (Prefácio). In edSpedding, J., The Works of Francis Bacon, vol IV, 13–21. London: Ellis and Heath. (1857–1874).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayle, P. (1697). In P. Marchand (ed), Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, 4 vols. Amsterdam/Leyde: P. Brunel (1730).

    Google Scholar 

  • Capella, M. (400). In A. Dick (ed), De Nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii. Leipsig: Teubner (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1963). Intellectual autobiography. In Schilpp, p. A., The Phylosophy of Rudolf Carnap, 1–84. La Salle/Illinois, IL/Open Court/London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, M. T. (1960). De Oratore, with an English Translation by H. Rackham. London/Cambridge: Heinemann/Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, S. T. (1817–1845). Encyclopaedia Metropolitanaa or Universal Dictionary of Knowledge, on an Original Plan, Comprising the Two Fold Advantages of a Philosophical and an Alphabetical Arrangement, 28 vols. London: Fellowes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1830). Cours de Philosophie Positive. Paris: J.B. Baillière et Fils (1869).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, J. (1968). Progrès des Sciences, Cahiers por l‘Analyse 9: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1963–1973). In F. Alquié (ed), Oeuvres philosophiques de Descartes, 3 vols. Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alembert, J. L. R. (1751). Discours Préliminaire de l’ Encyclopédie. Paris: Gonthier. (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1994). Oeuvres complètes de Diderot, Paris: Robert Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. Alembert, J. L. R. (edrs) (1751–1765). Encyclopédie ou Diccionaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers, par une Société de Gens de Lettres, mis en ordre et Publiée par M. Diderot, de l’Académie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Prusse, et Quant à la partie Mathématique par M. D’Alembert, de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris, de celle de Prusse et de la Société Royale de Londres, 28 vols. Paris: Le Breton/Briasson/Durand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersch, J. S. and e Gruber, J. G. (1818–1889). Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, von genannten Schriftstellern bearbeitet, 167 vols. Leipzig: Gleditsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaubert, G. (1880). Bouvard et Pécuchet, (trad. port. de Pedro Támen, “Bouvard e Pécuchet”). Lisboa: Cotovia. (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, R. (1991). On Otto Neurath. In Uebel, T. E. (edr.), Redescovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. Australian Studies on Otto Neurath and the Vienna Circle, 25–31. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1830). Enzyklopädie der Philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. trad. franc. de Maurice de Gandillac (1959). Encyclopédie des Sciences Philosophiques en Abrégé. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larousse, P. (1866–1890). Grand Dictionnaire Universel du XIX siècle. Français, Historique, Geographique, Mythologique, Bibliographique, Littéraire, Artistique, Scientifique, etc., Paris: Librairie Classique Larousse et Boyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1903). Opuscules et Fragments Inédits de Leibniz. Extraits des Manuscripts de la Bibliothèque Royale de Hannover par Louis Couturat. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G. W. (1960). Die Philosophischen Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Hrsg. von Carl Immanuel Gerhardt, 7 vols. Hildesheim: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lull, R. (1308). Ars Brevis (trad. franc. de Armand Llinares, “L‘Art Bref“) (1991). Paris: Du Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. (1969). On the history of the international encyclopedia of unified sciences. In Neurath, O. (ed), International Encyclopedia of Unifed Science, IX–XII vols, 1–10. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1936). L’Encyclopédie Comme Modèle, Revue de Synthèse XII, 2, 187–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1937a). Towards an encyclopedia of unified science. The new encyclopedia. In B. McGuinness (eds.), Unifed Science. The Viena Circle Monograph Series Originaly Edited by Otto Neurath, Now in an English Edition, pp. 130–141. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/Lancaster/Tokyo: D. Reidel Publishing Company. (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1937b). The departmentalization of unified science, Erkenntnis VII, 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1938a). Unified science and encyclopaedic integration. In International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, vol I, 1–27. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1938b). Encyclopaedism as a pedagogical aim: A Danish approach, Philosophy of Science 5, 484–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1946). The orchestration of the sciences in the encyclpedism of logical empiricism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research vol VI, 4, 496–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neurath, O. (1947). Unity of science movement. After six years, Synthèse 5, 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novalis, F. H. (1802). Fragmente (trad. franc. de Maurice Maeterlinck). Les Disciples à Saís et les Fragments de Novalis. Bruxelles: Paul Lacomblez (1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. R. (1958). The tree of knowledge, Harper’s 217: 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1970). La Situation des Sciences de l‘Homme dans le Systhème des Sciences. In J. Piaget, É pistémologie des Sciences de l‘Homme, pp. 13–130. Paris: Gallimard (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, O. (2002). Leibniz and the Encyclopaedic Project, Actas del Congresso Internacional Ciência, Tecnologia Y Bien Comun: La Actualidad de Leibniz, 267–278. Valencia: Editorial de la Universidad Politecnica de Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, O. (2006a). Unidade da Ciência. Programas, Figuras e Metáforas, p. 324. Lisboa: Duarte Reis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pombo, O. (2006b). O Hipertexto como limite da ideia de enciclopédia. In Pombo, O., Guerreiro, A., Franco Alexandre, A., (erds), Enciclopédia e Hipertexto, 266–301. Lisboa: Editora Duarte Reis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Simon, C. H. (1809). Projet d‘Encyclopédie. In Oeuvres de Claude-Henry de Saint-Simon, vol VI, pp. 280–314. Paris: Anthropos (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Isidoro de Sevilha (1951). Etimologias, version castellana total, por vez primera, e introducciones particulares de Don Luis Cortés y Gongora, introduccion general e índices cientificos del Santiago Montero Días. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, F. (1991). Otto Neurath: Encyclopedist, adult educationalist and school reformer. In Th. E. Uebel (edr.), Redescovering the Forgotten Vienna Circle. Australian Studies on Otto Neurath and th Vienna Circle, 255–264. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, L. (1531). De Tradentis Disciplinis, a translation together with an Introduction by Foster Watson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1913).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Pombo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pombo, O. (2011). Neurath and the Encyclopaedic Project of Unity of Science. In: Symons, J., Pombo, O., Torres, J. (eds) Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics