Skip to main content

Does Scientific Progress Necessarily Lead to a Unified Science?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 18))

  • 743 Accesses

Abstract

Neurath was one of the most conspicuous champions of the ideal of a unified science in the twentieth century. This ideal continues to influence the work of many scientists and some philosophers. However, it is not clear what precise sense should be given to the phrase “unification of science”. Different explications of it are possible. In this paper, I examine the notion of theoretical unification, which seems to me the most significant kind of unification. After having provided a formal explication of theoretical unification in terms of the notions of embedding and fundamental theory, I go on to consider what the prospects are for attaining the goal of theoretical unification, both from a synchronic and a diachronic perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., Sneed, J. D. (1987). An Architectonic for Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., Sneed, J. D., Moulines, C. U. (2000). Structuralist knowledge representation. Paradigmatic Examples. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebergall, K. G. (2002). Structuralism, model theory and reduction, Synthese 130(1), 135–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seife, Ch. (2005). Can the laws of physics be unified? Science 309, 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, L. (1992). Philosophy of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Ulises Moulines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moulines, C.U. (2011). Does Scientific Progress Necessarily Lead to a Unified Science?. In: Symons, J., Pombo, O., Torres, J. (eds) Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0143-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics