Advertisement

Two Unification Strategies: Analysis or Reduction, and Synthesis or Integration

  • Mario BungeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science book series (LEUS, volume 18)

Abstract

It is well known that, whereas two centuries ago there were only a handful of sciences, nowadays there are thousands. Just half a century ago, most physicists needed to consult only Physical Review. Today this journal has split into half a dozen publications, each of them devoted to a single subdiscipline, and read only by specialists in that branch. A similar branching out has been occurring in all the other research fields. In short, the branching out of science has been proceeded relentlessly. Something similar has been happening in technology and the humanities. On the surface, then, the collection of sciences look like a multicolored quilt.

Keywords

Structural Biology Logical Positivist Evolutionary Developmental Biology Organismic Biology External Consistency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arthur, W. (1997). The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bunge, M. (1967). Scientific Research, 2 vols. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY: Springer; Rev.: Philosophy of Science, 2 vols. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M. (1974). Treatise on Basic Philosophy, 2 vols: Interpretation and Truth. Dordrecht, Boston, MA: D. Reidel [Kluwer].Google Scholar
  4. Bunge, M. (1979). Treatise on Basic Philosophy, 4 vols: A World of Systems. Dordrecht, Boston, MA: D. Reidel [Kluwer].Google Scholar
  5. Bunge, M. (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy, 6 vols: Understanding the World. Dordrecht, Boston, MA: D. Reidel [Kluwer].Google Scholar
  6. Bunge, M. (1990). What kind of discipline is psychology: Autonomous or dependent, humanistic or scientific, biological or sociological? New Ideas in Psychology, 8, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunge, M. (1996). Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and Convergence. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. (2005). Chasing Reality. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dupré, J. (1993). The Disorder of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed). (2004). The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hilbert, D. (1901). Mathematische Probleme. Repr. In Gesammelte Abhandlungen III: 290–329. Berlin: Julius Springer, 1935.Google Scholar
  13. Looijen, R. C. (2000). Holism and Reducionism in Biology and Ecology. Dordrecht, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Medawar, P. (1984). The Limits of Science. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  15. Whewell, W. (1847).The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, rev. edn. London: John W. Parker. Repr.: London, Frank Cass, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. Wilkins, A. S. (2002). The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations