Skip to main content

Abstract

As the title indicates, Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension addresses the central question of the role played by prosody in language grammar and language processing. The eleven chapters of this book were developed from presentations to the Third Tone and Intonation in Europe Conference (TIE3), hosted by the Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal, in September 2008, and all of them deal with different aspects of the definition, implementation and processing of prosodic categories. They present novel contributions to the understanding of key issues in prosodic theory, such as prosodic phrasing in production and comprehension, the relationship between intonation and pragmatics in speech production, speech perception and comprehension, the development of prosodic categories that convey specific pragmatic meanings, the characterization of the prosody of sentence modality, the role of pitch in quantity-based sound systems, the phonology of consonant conditioned tone depression across languages, and the encoding of intonational contrasts both in intonational and in tonal languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behrens, H., and U. Gut. 2005. The relationship between prosodic and syntactic organization in early multiword speech. Journal of Child Language 32: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borràs-Comes, Joan, Maria del Mar Vanrell Bosch, and Pilar Prieto. 2010. The role of pitch range in establishing intonational contrasts in Catalan. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago (http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/papers/100103.pdf).

  • Carlson, Katy, Charles Clifton, Jr. and Lyn Frazier. 2001. Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Aoju. 2003. Reaction time as an indicator of discrete intonational contrast in English. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 2003, Geneva, 97–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Yiya. 2007. The phonetics and phonology of consonant-F0 interaction in Shanghai Chinese. Talk present at the workshop on Where Do Features Come From? Phonological Primitives in the Brain, the Mouth, and the Ear. Paris, October 5th, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, Charles Jr., Katy Carlson and Lyn Frazier. 2002. Informative prosodic boundaries. Language and Speech 45: 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Imperio, Mariapaola. 2000. The Role of Perception in Defining Tonal Targets and their Alignment. Ph.D. Thesis, The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Imperio, Mariapaola, and David House. 1997. Perception of questions and statements in Neapolitan Italian. In Proceedings of Eurospeech ’97, Rhodes, Greece, vol. 1, 251–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falé, Isabel, and Isabel Hub Faria. 2006. Categorical perception of intonational contrasts in European Portuguese. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006, Dresden, 2–5 May 2006 (on CD-ROM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. 2006. Focus projection and prosodic prominence in nested foci. Language 82(1): 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Janet Dean. 1998. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 27: 285–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Janet Dean. 2002. Psycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 83–88. Aix-en-Provence, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese. Phonological Phrasing and Intonation. New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frota, Sónia. 2002. The Prosody of Focus: a Case-Study with Cross-Linguistic Implications. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, Aix en Provence, 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frota, Sónia. 2010a. A focus intonational morpheme in European Portuguese: Production and Perception. In Gorka Elordieta and Pilar Prieto (eds.) Prosody and Meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frota, Sónia. 2010b. Prosodic structure in early child speech: Evidence from intonation, tempo and coda production. Talk present at the Workshop on Prosodic Development. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (http://www.fl.ul.pt/LaboratorioFonetica/texts/WPD_Frota2010.pdf).

  • Hallé, P., B. Boysson-Bardies, and M. Vihman. 1991. Beginnings of prosodic organization: intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Language and Speech 34(4): 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Martin. 1988. French. In Martin Harris and Nigel Vicent (eds.) The Romance Languages, 209–245. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hualde, José Ignacio. 2006/2007. Stress removal and stress addition in Spanish. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 5–2/6–1: 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, Michael and Justus C. Roux. 2002. Voice quality differences associated with stops and clicks in Xhosa. Journal of Phonetics 30: 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, Sun-Ah. 2003. Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32: 219–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Korean Intonational Phonology and Prosodic Transcription, Prosodic Typology. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.) Prosodic Typology. The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 201–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Patricia A. 1988. The phonology-phonetics interface. In Frederik J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. I. Linguistic Theory: Foundations, 281–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, J. and R. L. Diehl. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words. HIL Dissertations 34. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto, Pilar, Eva Estebas-Vilaplana, and Maria del Mar Vanrell Bosch. 2010. The relevance of prosodic structure in tonal articulation. Edge effects at the prosodic word level in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 38/4: 688–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rialland, Annie, and Stéphane Robert. 2001. The intonational system of Wolof. Linguistics 39(5): 893–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Katrin, Grzegorz Dogil, and Bernd Möbius. 2009. German boundary tones show categorical perception and a perceptual magnet effect when presented in different contexts. In Proceedings of Interspeech, Brighton, 2519–2522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigário, Marina. 2003. The Prosodic Word in European Portuguese. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Duane and Edward Gibson. 2005. Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension. Studia Linguistica 59: 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Max. W. 2005. The Phonology of Catalan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sónia Frota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frota, S., Elordieta, G., Prieto, P. (2011). Introduction. In: Frota, S., Elordieta, G., Prieto, P. (eds) Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0137-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics