Skip to main content

Matching Nutrigenomics, Society and Values

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genomics, Obesity and the Struggle over Responsibilities
  • 630 Accesses

Abstract

In the course of this book we stumbled upon so many ambiguities, controversies and uncertainties of the relationship between obesity, genomics and society that the time has come to try to find out their ethical meaning, in particular with respect to the improvement of the co-evolution of genomics and society. In discussing the current state of treatment of obesity, we found in Chapter 3 that there are at least three different ways of framing the problem of obesity: a Behaviour (individualizing and moralizing), an Environment (politicising and not individualizing) and a Body (individualizing but not moralizing) discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albano, M.G., Æ.C. Crozet and Æ.J.F. d’Ivernois (2008), Analysis of the 2004–2007 literature on therapeutic patient education in diabetes: Results and trends, Acta Diabetol, 45, 211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beadle, G.W. and E.L. Tatum (1941 November), Genetic control of biochemical reactions in neurospora, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 27, 11, 499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchler, J. (ed) (1955), Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York, NY: Dover

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D., AM Deffenbaugh, D. Pruss (2007), A systematic genetic assessment of 1,433 sequence variants of unknown clinical significance in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer-predisposition genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 81, 5, 873–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Est, R. v. and F. Brom (forthcoming), Technology Assessment as an Analytic and Democratic Practice, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Amsterdam: Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J., F. Felix, B. Bos and S. Spoelstra (2004), Practices for reflexive design: Lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 126–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlett, P. (2003), Technology, theory and deliberative democracy, Science, Technology and Human Values, 28, 1, 112–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katan, M. (2010) Overheersende Toevalstreffers [Dominant Fluke], www.katan.nl [Accessed June 2010]

    Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J., M. Korthals, M. Schermer and T. Swierstra (2004), Ethics in a Technological Culture: A programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29, 1, 3–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. and R. Komduur (2009), Uncertainties of genomics and their ethical impact, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, doi: 10.1007/s10806-009-9223–0, 435–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVea, J.F. (2007), Constructing good decisions in ethically charged situations: The role of dramatic rehearsal, Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 375–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsen, E.R., H.Y. Vanderpoo, C.H. Halsted, K.W. McNutt and H.H. Sandstead (1991), Ethics: Responsible scientific conduct, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 54, 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P.C., S. Sarah, S. Levy Murray and J. Craig Venter (2009), An agenda for personalized medicine, Nature, 461, 724–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, H. (2006), Genetics: What is a gene, Nature, 441, 398–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piatigorsky, J. (2007), Gene Sharing and Evolution. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., J.W. Schot and T.J. Misa (1995), Constructive technology assessment: A New paradigm for managing technology in society. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. Londen: Pinter, pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, G., J. Martinez, E. McCabe, J. Liao and K. Dipple (2005), Single-gene disorders: What role could moonlighting enzymes play?, The American Journal of Human Genetics, 76, 6, 911–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michiel Korthals .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Korthals, M. (2011). Matching Nutrigenomics, Society and Values. In: Korthals, M. (eds) Genomics, Obesity and the Struggle over Responsibilities. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0127-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics