Skip to main content

Prevention of Obesity and Personalized Nutrition: Public and Private Health

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genomics, Obesity and the Struggle over Responsibilities
  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

As we stated in Chapter 5, two of three main areas of ethical concern connected with nutrigenomics are the relationship between public or social health and nutrition and personalized or individualized health and nutrition and the relation between food and health. Efficacy reasons (Lang and Heasman, 2005, 118) or ethical reasons (UKPHA, 2004) are called upon to support public health policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Korsmeyer, 2002; Korsmeyer doesn’t take into account the personal history of tasting in listing factors that determine food preferences, p. 82, 98.

References

  • BBC-News (2005), DNA test for diabetes and obesity, Health Retrieved, 7 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. and G. Schmid (2003), From Nutrigenomics Science to Personalized Nutrition: The Market in 2010. Palo Alto, CA: The Institute for the Future

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, D. (2003), Clinical challenges posed by new biotechnology: The case of nutrigenomics, Post-Graduate Medical Journal, 79, 65–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, D., C. Cline, A.S. Daar, P.A. Singer and C. Tsamis (2006), Science, Society and the Supermarket: The Opportunities and Challenges of Nutrigenomics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, R. (2004), Nutrigenomics, individualism and public health, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 1, 161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. (1980), Healthism and the medicalization of every day, International Journal of Health Services, 10, 3, 365–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnton-Hill, I., B. Margetts and R. Deckelbaum. (2004), Public health nutrition and genetics: Implications for nutrition policy and promotion, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 1, 173–185(13)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Penna, D. (1999), Nutritional genomics: Manipulating plant micronutrients to improve human health, Science, 285, 375–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sohemy, A. (2007), Nutrigenomics of taste – impact on food preferences and food production. In: El-Sohemy A., L.Stewart, L.Khataan, B.Fontaine-Bisson, P.Kwong, S.Ozsungur, M.Cornelis, E.S.Tai and P.J. Gillies (eds), Nutrigenomics – Opportunities in Asia. Forum Nutr. vol. 60, Basel: Karger, pp. 176–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer (2005), Risk Issues. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_238_en.pdf [Accessed June 2006]

  • Food Ethics Council (2005), Getting Personal: Shifting Responsibilities for Health. Brighton: Food Ethics Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.F. (2004), Modern science versus the stigma of obesity, Nature medicine, 10, 6, 563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German, J.B. and H.J. Watzke (2004), Personalizing foods for health and delight, Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 3, 145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillsdon, M., C. Foster, B. Naidoo and H. Crombie (2004), The effectiveness of public health interventions for increasing physical activity among adults: A review of reviews. Evidence briefing of the NHS Health Development Agency. http://www.hda.nhs.uk/evidence [Accessed June 2006] London

  • Kant I. (1949), Critique of practical reason and other writings in moral philosophy. In: Beck L.W. (trans and ed) . Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, pp. 263–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. and R.L. Rodriguez (2004), Nutritional genomics: The next frontier in the postgenomic era. Physiological, Genomics, 16, 166–177, PMID: 14726599

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, M.J. and G.A. Mensah (2005), Genomics and the Prevention and Control of Common Chronic Diseases: Emerging Priorities for Public Health Action. Prev Chronic Dis (serial online) 2005 Apr. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/apr/05_0011.htm [Accessed June 2006]

  • Koelen, M.A. and B. Lindström (2005), Making healthy choices the easy choices: The role of empowerment, EJCN, 59, 1, S10–S16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsmeyer, C. (2002), Making Sense of Taste. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M. (2004), Before Dinner: Philosophy and Ethics of Food. Dordrecht: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. and M. Heasman (2005), Foodwars. London: Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1975), On Liberty, in: idem, Three Essays. Oxford: Oford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • O‘Neill, O. (2002), Public health or clinical ethics: Thinking beyond borders, Ethics and International Affairs, 16, 35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrini, C. (2002), The Pleasures of Slow Food: Celebrating Authentic Traditions, Flavors and Recipes. Chronicle Books London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (1995), Sick Individuals and sick populations, International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 1, 32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J., X. Qiang et al. (2004), The obesity pandemic: Where have we been and where are we going?, Obesity Research, 12, Supplement, 88S–100S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, G. (2005), The diet that fits – analyzing metabolism for personalized nutrition, Scientific American, 292, 3, 22–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, T.K. and D.B. Goldstein (2004), Will tomorrow’s medicines work for everyone?, Nature Genetics, 36, 11, S34–S42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Department of Health (2004), Choosing Health UK Department of Health. London

    Google Scholar 

  • UKPHA (2004), Public Health Association: Choosing health or losing health? UK Public Health Association London

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2005), The Bangkok Charter for health Promotion in a Globalized World. WHO. August 2005, available on http://www.who.int [Accessed June 2010]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michiel Korthals .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Korthals, M. (2011). Prevention of Obesity and Personalized Nutrition: Public and Private Health. In: Korthals, M. (eds) Genomics, Obesity and the Struggle over Responsibilities. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0127-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics